Deal UE Trump : la PIRE décision Economique de l'Histoire !

A single-speaker YouTube monologue criticizing a recent EU–US agreement negotiated between the European Commission and former U.S. President Trump. The speaker alleges the EU president "sold" Europe, describes asymmetric tariff terms (U.S. exports at 0% vs. Europeans at 15%, or 30% threat from Aug 1), a commitment to buy $700 billion of U.S. energy and weapons, and argues the deal represents a loss of European economic sovereignty contributing to deindustrialization and high energy costs. The piece mixes specific numeric claims with broad political and moral critique and concludes with a personal call-to-action (consulting calendar).
Hello, friends. There was a rather astonishing situation yesterday when Laon, the president of the European Commission, literally sold Europe to the United States. She confirmed Europe's economic vassalage to the United States. So to tell you the truth, she went to negotiate with Trump. And then initially she said, what we want is zero. We want, which means zero taxes from the European Union, a zero tax on American products, and vice versa. We can sell to the United States without a trade barrier. But Trump didn't see it that way. That is to say, for him, he follows his maga. The United States comes first. And this sometimes involves crushing other countries. And that's what he did with the European Union. So the idea was this. When she arrived to talk, he told no, I'm not here for that. You didn't understand. We're not here to make equal, equal zero. No, no, it doesn't work like that for him. He's acting in a certain way. Maybe the humor is a bit too strong, but he's acting in a way that seeks revenge. Why? Because he knows one thing. He knows that for a very long time, Europeans have benefited from extremely low wan rates or situations to sell to the United States between 2% and 5%. Let's say it doesn't even reach 5%. 4.8 on average. With quite a few industries benefiting from 2%. At the same time. Europe has always imposed tariffs, both customs and non customs. This means, for example, barriers such as regulations. Sometimes there are regulations that actually create a regulatory barrier that is created with a view to protectionism. It is to prevent products from coming from outside. There is also vat. For example, an American service provider who wants to sell a service to Europeans must pay VAT, which can be as high as 25% depending on the location. So even if it is not a banner, a customs barrier, it is still one. So for Trump, he wants more than just the butter, the, the money from the sidelines and the help of the farmer. So what did he do? He said that in his vision, it is simple. Americans will have zero percent to sell their products and services in Europe. Zero percent. Europeans will pay 15%. So that means we are going to multiply. That means the United States will multiply by an average of 3 the taxes that Europeans will have to pay in the United States. And he said, if you refuse, well, it will be 30% on August 1st. So you know what I mean. It's not even negotiation. It's I impose my will on you and you fold on top of that. That's not all. That's not all the Europeans are committed to buying 700 billion worth of American energy. That means oil and everything, plus investing in weapons, plus more. We're just assessing the damage. It literally means it's an unconditional surrender that was signed by villain. When you see her, even her body language is quite frightening. She's sitting like that, it looks like she's in custody. Doesn't looks like she's in custody waiting for her fate to be decided. And by the way, an extremely delicious moment is when you lecture her on swindling. He talks to him about wind turbines. He tells him that in the United States there will be no more wind turbines because they have degraded everything. They have degraded our landscapes, they have even degraded them ecologically. They are very expensive. Ecologically speaking, we don't know what to do with them after eight years, after a few years, because you have to know that they are often guaranteed for 10, 15, 20 years, but in fact sometimes they are ruined. Well before that time he mentioned the word value of eight years. That's what I also noticed when writing my book Swindlers. That is to say, we buy them, we install them, and then we start thinking about how we are going to dismantle them. It is important to know that those who produce them. China. He mentions China. He says the majority of wind turbines come from China. Those who produce them actually put in a kind of planned obsolescence so that the customer who buys them, well, the customer who buys them, who is it? It's the European. It's, it's the idiot, right? So he buys them, he installs them, and we're already talking about the next contracts. So he also says something very interesting because there will be people even in the comments of this video who will come and say, yes, but wind turbines generate energy and all that. Yes, but the problem is that it's a very expensive energy that requires subsidies. And as Trump rightly says, energy must make you money, it must not cost you money. It makes no sense. If you have a system that generates energy at a loss and you have to finance it with people's taxes just to reach zero, it makes absolutely no sense. We can all manufacture machines, all create businesses that are inherently loss making by design, and then say, well, the taxpayer will pay the difference. And that's why, that's why in Europe we have extremely high energy costs which are very, very expensive when compared to the planet. Which means that, well, Europe is in the process of de industrializing because quite simply there is no way to produce with the energy costs on top of the regulatory costs, on top of the taxation. I would say that what Europe is doing makes absolutely no sense. But if you look at it, there is a position, observe it in the past or in the future. There is a logic of positioning of the European Union. You will find it very strongly in Macron too. It is that when we do business, when we sign commercial deals, what do we look at? We look at whether we are winning, whether we are losing. If we are losing, there is no point in signing them. We also look at our own interests, even if the other party will also see their interests. But we have to find a place where both are winners. Europe has never done that. If you look at Europe's position on the big issues of Ukraine, on climate issues, on ecology, on Taiwan, on China, on many things, Europe is more in line with the logic of acting according to our values. Europe is in line with a civilizing logic that means that this is a continent that is collapsing, that is becoming deindustrialized, that is plunging into poverty, that is regressing on all levels, on all objective levels that can be measured, even the quality of life is inflation, insecurity, endemic corruption, and who is actually doing what. And I'm not even talking about the insolvency of the states that are in debt up to their necks. Just, just the United Kingdom, which for me is part of the European Union, the United Kingdom alone, for example, is currently borrowing record amounts every month. Not to repay its debt, which I don't think it will ever repay, but to pay the interest on the debt. Imagine someone who is so deep in debt, right, that they are forced to take out a consumer loan to pay the interest on the loans they have, not even to repay the loans. That's where we are. But we like to lecture. When we look at European leaders, we get the impression that they are on a civilizing mission. They have values, they have values. No one on earth has any value for them. People are worthless. They are the only ones who sink into poverty, who sink their people into poverty by saying that they have functioned according to our values, we have followed our values. So in fact they are following what they call values that are in reality a cover up for poverty, which are in reality a sort of veil, isn't it, of modesty that he places over their corruption, that he places over the. Over the unfair decisions that they make. And the reality is that, well, today, here we are with this deal that is not a deal, that is a surrender. Well, here we are once again a major failure by the way, when there was the. When there was Brexit, one of the big. One of the big challenges, or one of the big challenges of Brexit, was that the United Kingdom had noted that when a country joins the European Union, it gives its economic sovereignty to the European Union. To give you a simple example, in 2016, when Brexit was voted on, it was noted that the United Kingdom had absolutely no economic agreement between countries in the world. There was no valid agreement between the European Union and any country on the planet. All the agreements, 100% of the agreements, were agreements that were placed under the control of the European Union. And that was a big problem. It was one of the big challenges in reality, for those of me who have many friends who are in the logic of Freida, and in fact, it is a big challenge. It means we will have to regain control of our economy and then see how it will be possible to negotiate bilateral agreements, because that no longer exists today. Bilateral agreements are always agreements between the European Union and other countries or other regions in the world. And they are agreements that are binding on everyone. That is one of the things that happens when we sign, we lose our economic sovereignty. In any case, the European Union is and has always been a wholesaler of sovereignties. That means that if there wasn't the European Union and Trump wanted this kind of agreement with the EU countries that are in power today, well, he would have had to do them one by one. If he did one every three months, well, he, his term would never have been enough to get them all under this agreement, you see, because 20, 27, there are 27 countries. You multiply that by three and you can see what that's going to give you. Without a mandate, it won't be enough. So by putting everyone under the control of an unelected administration, a bureaucratic administration that is capable, let me remind you, of even signing agreements by SMS, by text messages, from personal phones, by WhatsApp. They are capable of doing it, and it has been done. So once you're under the thumb of such a system, such a gas factory somewhere, well, then you can't defend yourself. There's no country in the European Union that can say we're defending our interests, right? Your interests don't exist. There are unelected people, for example, who will literally offer you foot and gun to, for example, Tram, in that case, tomorrow she could offer you to anyone else, and then, well, it's not in your interest. Well, well, it's not without its problems, you see. So here it is, my friends. To follow. We're going to follow this story a little bit, but it looks like it's going to be extremely, extremely badly off. Thank you for watching this video so far. For your information, I've opened my consulting calendar. If you would like to come and talk to me directly about your personal, professional or expatriation projects or anything else, feel free to book from the calendar on the pinned comment. See you soon.
More from Aldo

La FIN du Royaume-Uni ? L'Ecosse, l'Irlande du Nord et le Pays de Galles veulent partir !

Analyse Présidentielles 2027 : Marine le Pen remet ENCORE le voile sur la table !

Scandale "60 Millions de Consommateurs" : la France mange des pâtes contaminées au Cadmium !

2 dossiers : Accident d'autogyre en Italie & un pilote sauvé par le parachute du Cirrus






