Grande-Bretagne : les viols éthniques de Telford

A speaker argues that mass immigration from Pakistan to the UK enabled organized sexual exploitation of vulnerable young people, which authorities failed to stop. He links this to broader claims about Western social decline and loss of cultural cohesion.
Hello, my friends. Since ancient Greece, the West seems to have been under the influence of dialectical reason. This means that as soon as a project or an idea is justified by dialectics, that is to say, by speech, by reasoning, by saliva, to go to the material level of things, it is considered feasible. Whereas a lot of things that are dialectically justified would not be justified by their consequences. If we looked at where they lead us. And unfortunately, when you look at the west for a few decades, it is exactly locked into that. And not only the west as a civilization, but a lot of people in their personal lives also do things that are dialectically justified, but they are not prepared to face the consequences. This means that justification by consequences is not there. So one of these manifestations of this flaw is what is called mass immigration, or what is also called, in another way, multiculturalism. This is a plan of social engineering. It is a large scale societal manipulation. It is something of a historical level. Never has a people on the long march of humanity for millions of years, never has a people decided of its own accord that it would be time to try to coexist with cultures, with elements that come from other nations, and that it is necessary to import them into its country, pay them to have children, and then watch them grow and then coexist with them. It is total madness in terms of consequences, even if in terms of dialectics, you will always find people who will tell you, we must be open to others, we must be loving, other cultures are equal, people can come from elsewhere and bring us enrichment, bring us openness, and so on. In terms of dialectics, it can sometimes even make sense. In terms of consequences, it is horrible. So in England, at one point, there was a very large scale societal manipulation that involved importing a huge number of people from other cultures, particularly so called Asian cultures, and I'm talking about Pakistan in particular. Now, it's important to understand one thing. This importation was done without any compensation. This means that people who could come here were not required to integrate or assimilate or anything else, but on the contrary, were encouraged to maintain their cultural specificity. So what does this create? It creates a huge social divide where society is made up of communities that live in parallel and each one lives at a different time, so to speak. So societal manipulations are generally paid for in a deferred manner. This means that you do the manipulation today. It's not necessary for the payment to arrive within 24 or 48 hours.
Okay?
It always happens in a deferred manner. For example, in France, you'll See the cursed siblings. If a certain number of policies had not been implemented in a loving manner, these siblings would not even have been born in France.
Okay?
But they were born, and the payment came later. And the payment for what is done today will come later, when the politicians who are in power today. Retirement, right? It's always like that. Although we are seeing an acceleration of the cycles, and perhaps we will see payments over much shorter periods. One thing is still important to know. In many Muslim societies, such as Pakistan, for example, but I'm not referring to Pakistan in particular. Many societies, Algeria is not in a better position. There is sexual misery, sexual deprivation, and an organized sexual frustration. Organized why? Because society, these societies live according to them, are the result, if you like, of centuries of Islamic influence, A century of centuries of Islamic politics that have created society or shaped society as it is today. So it is not the result, it is not an accidental result of something that started three years ago. It is something that has spread over several generations to give rise to the societies that we know today. For generations, these societies were under caliphs with the aim. And what is the primary goal of a caliphate? The primary goal of a caliphate is jihad. Incite the population, the gu.
Okay.
While the Caliph and his followers live in luxury and debauchery and all that, the population as a whole must have no other vocation than to give its most valiant children, its most valiant adults, so that they go and wage jihad for the Caliph, fight his wars, to extend his area of influence, to bring him women, food and all that. The classics and history. History is full of millions of examples that amply illustrate what I am saying. So it must be understood that one of the motivations for jihad is this story of the virgins. The Famous virgins, huh? 72 on the couch, delivered to the jihad list. Although some people get 144 and even more, in fact, the. We're not going to quibble over the figures, but for people to agree to give up their jobs, agree to give up their lives, their peace of mind, and go and die for a man of power in exchange for. In response to stimuli, to sexual stimuli, they must have basically lived in misery, in total sexual frustration. Do you see the thing? It's not by chance. Moreover, you'll notice that in countries, if you look at the history of Muslim countries, you'll notice, you'll see that often people who had consenting adults, who had sexual relations and who were discovered ended up either stoned.
Huh?
Which is an extremely cruel death, and they had to be stoned by Other sexually frustrated people, meaning it was the population who had to come and stone them and see that.
And.
And generally they took out all their anger on these people who had access to sexuality when they were deprived of it. And so they hated them so much that they really wanted to attack them with stones, to stone them, to whip them. In short, people couldn't get away with it. People, they died. While at the same time, the state rapists of the caliphate that the west tries to glamorize by calling Haram. We've never heard of a caliph who was killed because he slept with women in hurrahms. No, that doesn't exist. The frustration was for the gu. For the ordinary population. And for the ordinary population, their only way of accessing a form of sexuality was beyond the grave. They said, so from the start, you die once you are in your tomb and you have died for your Lord. At that moment, you will have the same harem as him, even better than Him. But for now, you have to kill for us. And in fact, that has allowed the establishment of nations with a deprivation, a sexual misery never seen or heard of. So, of course, this sexual misery, even in the countries where it comes from, causes disasters, extraordinary social delays. I am not talking about compensatory or convenient homosexuality, which is wreaking havoc in countries like Afghanistan or Pakistan or others where people who are not homosexual by vocation become so out of frustration, like in prisons, for example. I'm not talking about the rapes or sexual violence suffered by children.
Huh.
There was a scandal recently where American soldiers had to turn a blind eye to Afghans who were having sex with little boys. I mean, pederasty, having sex with little boys. That's the norm in Afghanistan. It's the norm. Women, vaginas, they don't know what that is. Some of them haven't seen them in their lives. So abuses that are abuses that people suffer, it's always this sexual frustration that comes out in some way from people who are the most vulnerable in society, from the crazy, the homeless, the runaways, the homeless. You know, I'm not going to give more details because it can get very sordid very quickly. I don't want this video to look like a sparbic book either, but there are a lot of ways in which this sexual frustration comes out, and most often it's in the form of violence, sexual violence. And it can go as far as bombings, suicide bombings, which are just a Freudian expression of this sexual violence organized by society. So that was the first element, second Point. You need to know that I'm going to say a Palisade. You know, sir, 10 minutes before her death, she was still alive. So I'm going to say something obvious. If you take the most dangerous place in the world in terms of crime, the place where you can't last 30 minutes before someone kills you, rapes you or whatever, and you ignore the crime rate of the population, the crime rate is exactly zero.
Okay?
That means that when we talk about crime in a region, we're not talking about crime on Earth. It's not like there's a country where there's a lot of rape, or there's a country where there's people who sell drugs and kill people. It's not the land that sells drugs, it's the people. So the people in general on Earth, the crime rate will represent the crime of the population on Earth, not the crime on earth. Why, why do I say this? Because very often we see this in leftist reasoning. Ah, There are civil wars here, or wars or violence or whatever. We have to save the population by removing them from there. Yes, but wait. It's not just because the population lives in this place that it has its problems. These problems are in the population itself. So if you remove it from this place and put it somewhere else, you could put it in Japan. The problems will come with it because very often the inhabitants of areas that have problems are not victims. And this is where the left is. Right? I'll give them the point on this. Its inhabitants are victims, but at the same time they are the vectors of these problems. So moving them en masse would not solve the problem.
Okay.
So the rate of sexual violence found in Pakistan, for example, does not represent the rape of the Pakistani land where you sleep and then Martians come out at night to rape that land. It really represents the rate or the risk of being raped by the inhabitants of that land. That's kind of the idea. So in these countries, in these countries there is a sort of vicious circle. That is to say, on the one hand, there is sexual misery, sexual frustration that is organized. On the other hand, people are forced to feed it in the sense that there is more sexual freedom, whether it be among women, men, or even adults. Because sex is a weapon in these countries. Sexuality, we don't say making love there. That word doesn't exist. That word would make people laugh if it were translated into their language. Sexuality is a weapon in its own right. It has always been considered this way because it is used as a weapon of war. And it is also used to manipulate populations. As I told you, when you have a physiological need that you can raise or control with a remote control that allows you to send a guy to blow himself up for you, I mean, that is a weapon.
Okay.
So women are locked up. People in these countries lock up their women. Why do they lock them up too? They lock them up for their protection too. Because you know very well that if you let her out, if she goes out and she knows it too, she won't last three or four hours, she will be raped. So there is also this overprotection that comes from a society that knows about the sexual violence that exists in the world. Okay, so far I think we are pretty much there. So when these people arrive in England, what are they going to find? They're going to find areas where people call white people, but they're kind of the white underclass. These are white people who have been looked down upon by the London people. These are white people who are knockouts. These are people who don't count. These are people who were working class, you know, who worked in mines, who worked in factories and everything. At the time when this kind of professional activity existed in England, then the mines were closed, the factories were closed, their whole economy was kind of devastated. And so they find themselves with nothing, which means that no one cares about them. There's no politician who wants to get involved for this class.
Okay.
So these are classes that even without the intervention of these rapists who come from Pakistan, without their intervention, these are classes that already have their share of social delays. Pregnant girls at 14, drug addiction, sometimes pimping, even in the parental environment. I have seen and read absolutely abominable articles where you have the father who plays on the console on the first floor while his daughter receives clients, his 15 year old daughter receives clients that he brought to the second floor so that he would pay for the latest game that is coming out. I mean, it's mind boggling. The alcoholism, the unemployment that spans generations. There are generations where children have never seen their parents work and their parents have never seen their own parents work. That means that when I say a generation, I mean 15 years in these regions. So these are regions that are already basically. I'm not talking about the English middle class, I'm really talking about the completely underprivileged class. And it's a fragile class, it's a class that deserves protection, but that doesn't interest anyone here. So when there was this crazy migration that started in the 80s that they are now trying to stop, by all means what happened? We put Pakistani society, the one I wanted to describe, face to face with this English society as I just described it to you. There you have it. What did it lead to? It led to the catastrophe I'm talking about. Young girls were raped, the youngest was 11 years old, sold, beaten, abused. And what's terrible is that no one wanted to defend these people. The police turned a blind eye, the politicians turned a blind eye, and the Pakistani gangs understood that this country literally offers these women as fodder to anyone who wants to bother and they feel catered to. The press here doesn't talk about it. It's become a sort of taboo subject. Not necessarily, but it doesn't interest anyone. Why? Because we see the leftists. Because the leftists have corrupted the entire press, the majority of the press here and in France and on the left, the left has made its choices. Once the left supported mass immigration, for example, it knew that terrorism would come with it. It knew that crime would come with it. And so logically, it was already ready when it agreed to encourage multiculturalism, the unpronounceable word. It agreed to turn a blind eye to the lateness that goes with it. You know, it's not, it's nothing, it's nothing. It's nothing illogical. In fact, it's in the same rationale. In addition, since it's white people who suffer, since it's white people who suffer and who are attacked by people who are almost entirely from Pakistan. Well, here there's political correctness, there's a fear of political correctness. That means politicians or social services or others, they're afraid, they say to themselves, well if I talk about this, won't I be seen as an Islamophobe or go, God forbid, are racist? And that completely blocks any form of initiative. But beyond that, instead of that, beyond the people who, on a personal level, the professionals who didn't want to get involved, there is still the result or the fruit of a system because it's not 12 rapes, it's not three, it's thousands. It didn't happen in one season, it happened over decades. And in their report, the social services write that they were prostitutes, that the girls were described as, you know, to put it bluntly, they were described like that 11 year old girls described as. Do you see the thing, see the contempt that this cast has for these victims? So really, I don't know what else to tell you. Let me explain to you a little bit about the mental mechanism in which all this takes place. But I can tell you that the London class and I think the Parisian caste look at the French who are in the inherited class in pretty much the same way. Honestly, if they could exterminate them or whatever, they would be ready. They have no idea. They don't even consider them as animals. They consider them as less than nothing, as a form of life. And again, okay, absolute and total contempt. And unfortunately, there's no one who speaks for them. Well, very few voices are raised for them. But if you think that the average Englishman is scandalized by this. No, I'll tell you right away, the average Englishman has nothing to do with it. There are some who are aware of a sort of political or other conscience, but I can assure you that for the majority, their conscience concerns their football team, their mortgage payments, their credit cards, their trip to Ibiza in three months, and things of that nature. I can assure you that it's not a scandal here. It's not a scandal at all. It's a complete no show. It's unfortunately, unfortunately. What do you want? It's the whites, if you like. And that's where, when I go to Algeria, for example, I find myself in Arab society, despite all the flaws it may have. I'm still happy that there is this cohesion, this awareness, if you like, of identity, which is very, very strong. Uh, the identitarianism that exists in Algeria, for example, I can tell you that if you take the most extreme identitarianism in France, we can't even come close to our level. You know, when you compare it in terms of the strength of this identitarianism, do you understand what I mean? It's very strong. And it's this cohesion that allows a people to be divided. You know, Algerians are divided on a lot of subjects. You know, we argue, we call each other everything, we call each other animals, we call each other worthless. We really are. On a lot of subjects, on the other hand, on subjects concerning our survival, on extremely profound subjects linked to our very existence, I can assure you that 99.9% of people react exactly the same way immediately. And that's it. You have a population that suddenly seems divided on a lot of things, and it's exhaustingly forming a wall. The west has lost. Why has it lost? Simply because there is no more cohesion. There are too many divisions that have been made. It has become balkanized and it has become balkanized. Even at the lowest level, at the very level of its survival, even at the level of its survival, even its own survival, its own existence, can no longer make it united with another who is different from it, or who does not share a certain number of ideas with it, or whatever. Whereas when we reach the level of survival, all the other elements must disappear. Unfortunately, the west has already been broken even at this extremely deep level. And from there it is clear that from there it is clear that it is a question of time. From there it is. From there it is. Getting it out of this. It is a dream, you know. Finally, I could tell you more about it, but I think that's enough for today. I'll leave you with my friends. Thank you for being here. Thank you for your encouragement. As for the little one, she's doing great. She's eating and sleeping. She's super easy, super simple. She doesn't bother anyone. So it's excellent. I expected more than that, but for now, touch wood. She's extremely calm, extremely quiet, and that's it. So I'll be back and I'll come back when I can. That's it. See you soon.
More from Aldo

La FIN du Royaume-Uni ? L'Ecosse, l'Irlande du Nord et le Pays de Galles veulent partir !

Analyse Présidentielles 2027 : Marine le Pen remet ENCORE le voile sur la table !

Scandale "60 Millions de Consommateurs" : la France mange des pâtes contaminées au Cadmium !

2 dossiers : Accident d'autogyre en Italie & un pilote sauvé par le parachute du Cirrus






