A French-language YouTube monologue (Feb 2022) arguing that the Russia–Ukraine conflict was long-planned by Western elites and that NATO expansion provoked Russian reaction. The speaker links this to broader themes: the West’s cultural decline, the prospect of a China–Taiwan invasion, and a sustained strategy of keeping populations in fear (terrorism, COVID, climate, war) to benefit political and commercial elites—especially the arms industry. The speaker’s remedy is individual disengagement (don’t watch the news) and national withdrawal from alliances like NATO and the EU; he also promotes his Aldo Aviation channel as alternative content.
Hello, my friends, it has not escaped your attention that Russia invaded Ukraine. This was a plan that dated back to the Clinton era. Hillary Clinton, if you remember her attitude during the campaign when she was against Trump, she absolutely wanted to launch a war against Russia. I think that their group there, their little clique, had this on their agenda because a war of this size cannot be declared just like that. It is something that is being prepared. There is a speech. There are many things. By the way, I invite you to watch a video that I published a number of years ago that I will put in the description of this video to go back to the origins of Russophobia. It was. How should I say it? There has been anti Russian rhetoric that has demonized Russia for about 10 years now. I remember when it started. There was a before and there was an after. For those who don't have time to watch the other video, it was in this speech where Putin declared that Western civilization is a civilization with Christian roots. He insisted on traditional values, family values and all that. And at that time, it's true that with this speech, he validated, let's say, a civilizational divide that existed between Russia, which wanted to maintain a certain orthodoxy, and Europe. Central and Western Europe, in particular, the United States, Canada, Australia. These countries undermined by progressivism, who consider that now we can free ourselves from all the rules of civilization and live more or less as we want. That means another way of destroying the heritage of thousands of thousands of years and then finding ourselves naked one day. There you have it, one hand in front of, one hand behind, as they say. So I'll tell you something. When Trump was in power, it's true that they lost money in terms of war. It's true that now, if you look at the stocks, I haven't even looked, but I think it's about time to sell pharmaceuticals and buy military assets. Now is the way to make money, the way to transfer wealth from the masses to the minority. Always the same minority will use completely different paths. But hey, the result is always the same. If you look at how many fortunes will be made in the coming months and years, that's the first point I wanted to discuss with you. The second point, which seems to me to be quite opportune in terms of opportunity, I would say that China invades Taiwan. Indeed, China has been dreaming for years. It's been tempting them to attack Taiwan for years. And I think that in terms of a window of opportunity, if they don't do it today, they never will. It's now or never. If they don't do it today. If they don't do it these days, it's because frankly, their attitude towards Taiwan. It's just a kind of speech more for their domestic policy than anything else. They never thought about. Verwan, that's the second point I wanted to share with you. A very important point and it may be the most important one. I'll tell you something. In the west, there's a right that you have that we've lost. It's a very important right. And if we zoom out completely, we move away from Ukraine, Russia, all these stories in recent years, all that, what do we see? We see that we no longer have the right to live in peace. Peace. Ah, salaam in Arabic. Shalom. We don't have the right. We live with people who want to keep the population in a constant state of emergency. To keep it in a state of terror. It's like we're literally governed by Daesh. What does that mean? It means you have terrorism. We've had years of explosions, the Battaklan, the people being run over at Christmas parties and so on, at Christmas markets and all that. People lived in this terror. Okay? The calls in the metro, on the train. Be careful. If you see suspicious luggage, it's these voices of death. These voices from beyond the grave, right? Then we had two years of COVID Always the same voices. Others fall. Social distancing, masks, symptoms, etc. I mean, more terror. More terror. The population kept in terror. Now that very, very few people think about these stories anymore or are affected by them or take them seriously. There will be war with Russia. Oh, there you have it. A war with Russia. A world war for the sake of it. And then tomorrow it will be global warming. The next day it. It will be a health scandal. The next day it will be. I don't know. It will always be like this. It will be a meteorite. It will be a volcano. They will find anything. At worst they will invent it. At worst they will cause it. Okay? So that you cannot live in peace. You no longer have the right to live in peace. Carelessness must no longer exist. Must no longer reign even for a minute on a western land. We will have to go from hysteria to hysteria, from fear to fear. From fear to fear. That is how they want things to happen. So there you have it, my friends. The only offer I have for you, the only solution. Don't watch the news. Give up. Give up. I'm telling you, give up. Don't watch. I don't watch. How do I know that Russia invaded Ukraine because quite simply, I have people who send me messages and all that. And so, you know, inevitably I see it. But I assure you that I haven't even watched it for a very long time. It's useless. It's fear mongering. It's going to keep you awake, it's going to worry you, it's going to make you anxious. And then in the end, what's the end result? They're going to make money and then move on to something else, as usual. That's all. There you have it. It's now the turn of the big companies, the big arms companies to make money. It's also an opportunity for some to shine, like Mr. Macron, for example. Macron is heading into an election where he is literally risking his life, not to say his life. What is he going to do to Macron? Well, Macron is going to present himself as a warlord. He is going to put on his armor the savior of France, the savior of the world, the savior of the planet. But hey, all of this is fundamentally, all of this is fundamentally twisted. The Ukrainians thought that it was a good thing, that it would bring them security to join NATO. Ah, Russia is surrounded. If you look at the evolution of NATO bases, Russia is literally constantly surrounded. So sooner or later they were going to react. So Ukraine, he arrives there, he wants to join NATO. In other words, he wanted to serve as a deer cannon for NATO. He wanted to put himself, he wanted his land and his people to be used as a buffer zone between, between Russia and the west and Western forces. He wanted to serve somewhere. He wanted to become the new Afghanistan. Remember Afghanistan, that story with the Taliban and all that, where there were finally the so called mujahideen at the time. Be careful, the terminology is important, huh? When bearded men armed by the United States fight for the United States, they are mujahideen, right? We even receive them at the White House. Even NASA dedicated a mission to the Mujahideen. True, I assure you, seriously, verbatim, as I said. Now, if ever he plays against the side of good, at that point he becomes Taliban, okay? He becomes terrorists. Finally, what I was saying is that it was a proxy war, huh? A war on an intermediate land that served between. A war between what? Ultimately Russia, the USSR at the time, and the United States on an intermediate land. Other lands served exactly the same fate. The Ukrainians, who by the way, are like the Ukrainian government, are like Biden and his son. Do you remember the fights that took place during the election campaign? There are personal interests Family interests involved. There you have it. They followed the plan, and that's it. And now they're suffering. In the long term, I would say that every country that wants to achieve some form of tranquility and peace will have to leave NATO. Because NATO is not just an instrument, a hegemonic instrument of the United States to put their vassals in one place and then remotely control wars, remotely control tensions that will ultimately suit the private affairs of their ruling clique, suit their arms industry, and that's it. So we're really going to have to distance ourselves. Every country that remains in these clique is going to find itself drawn into wars, uh, which are contrary to its interests. I mean, that's it. It makes no sense to belong to things like NATO and even less to things like the European Union. We have to get out of there. Okay, we've gotten out of the European Union, but we haven't gotten out of NATO yet. But we have to get out of both and then distance ourselves, take our marbles and do, like, Switzerland, you know? I mean, sort it out among yourselves. That's all. There you have it, my friends. Disconnect, Disconnect, Disconnect from the tv. If you want to disconnect, find me on the Aldo Aviation Channel. On the Aldo Aviation Channel. I have lots and lots of videos. I think I have 70 at this point, and there are others in production. There are special issues on lots of things, and it has nothing to do with the news. Honestly, it allows me to distance myself. I don't want to be part of these hysteria stories and all that anymore. See you soon, my friends. Mister.
