Il veut la GUERRE ! Le WSJ révèle les ambitions de Macron

Good morning, my friends. I have in my hands an absolutely frightening article from the Wall Street Journal, an American newspaper close to the establishment, which talks about Macron. This article is dated April 3, 2024. And what we learn about Macron is quite astounding. The French press, which is generally a nationalized press, a press that, through subsidies, belongs, let's say, to the French state, in a way, is going to go easy on it when it talks about Macron. But here, the Wall Street Journal, in a way, is not going to shoot at it with a red bullet. That's not it, but it's revealing it. It's revealing it. But it's also a way for Washington, through this article, to tell the Russians and other interested or involved parties that listen, it's not us. The Ukraine war, that's not us anymore. We may have started it, yes, but now it's more France that's in the forefront. There is one thing you need to know, and this is highlighted at one point in the article. I will also give you a download of it. In the description of the video, there is a very interesting element. If you watch, we will see Trump potentially returning to politics, or rather returning to the presidency or returning to the White House. Personally, I have my doubts. I do not think that the American deep state will let Trump come back, no matter what means are used. I am saying there is no way that is not on the table. All possible and imaginable means are available to prevent Trump from coming back to power. They got rid of him the first time with the years of chaos that we experienced. I do not think they will let him come back to power a second time, but that is another story. Nevertheless, in Washington, people, people are anticipating Trump's return. Trump is an isolationist. He is not someone who will focus on wars left and right and all that. He would rather play the appeasement game outside and then return to business in the United States. You have to know that he is more of an industrial capitalist. He is there to, as he says, build roads, build factories and all that. So it is not in the logic of waging war to enrich the military or industrial complex. That is more Biden. So we need an heir to this war. That means that. Let's imagine that in a few months, the end of the year is coming quickly. In a few months, Biden packs his bags and leaves the White House. This war will have to continue for the interests of the military industrial complex. Someone will have to lead it. Who will lead it? The leader will be France, the heir to the war will be France. France will be irritated by the war with Russia. We are quite shocked because we tell ourselves that Macron is not the American president. He is not there to play for American interests. He is not the Ukrainian president. He was not voted in by the French people to defend or sacrifice the nation for Ukraine. He was not voted in on that program. However, according to the article, he is completely unleashed to such an extent that he even worries the German shoals, he even Biden, even Biden tells him, listen, Macron, please. What I mean, you're getting carried away. We understand the truth, but now you're out of control. What's going on? He says some pretty interesting things. I won't tell you everything, but there are some pretty interesting things. When, for example, Macron pushes for strategic ambiguity towards Russia. By the way, strategic ambiguity gives us an idea of Macron's style even when he's doing politics at home. It means feeding ambiguity, saying one thing and then its opposite, promising something and then changing your mind, blowing hot and cold, killing something, and then later in the afternoon, responding to someone, a journalist, and then saying the opposite. So always, as the newspaper says, leaving the in expectation. But in reality, with Macron, it's not just the Kremlin who is expectant. There are also the French who are in the same situation, because quite simply, he says one thing and a short time later, he says the opposite. So that's what the newspaper tells us. Mr. Biden and other American officials have repeatedly ruled out sending American troops to Ukraine, including during President Biden's State of the Union address on March 7. So the Americans keep ruling out through leading voices, either leading politicians or military officials who say there will be no American ground troops, except that Macron says the opposite. There will be European troops. He wants to go with European troops. For Mr. Macron, and I quote, the war in Ukraine has become a litmus test of Europe's ability to survive in a world where US Security guarantees are no longer a given. What does that mean? I'm telling you, and it might give you an idea of why Macron seems obsessed with this war, that he wants to push to its climax. He wants to trigger direct hostilities between European countries and Russia. I'll tell you why, probably, probably, and this is my analysis, but I think it deserves reflection. It's that Macron, in all his communication, even since his first term, does not see himself as the European president, the chip. He does not see himself as the French president, but sees himself as a European president. He dreams of a Europe On a scale a bit like the United States of Europe. That's what he dreams of. For him, France is just a miserable province somewhere that makes a corner on the European map. That's not what interests him. If his presidency can serve the advent of a real European Union. When I say a real European Union, what am I talking about? A European Union that could, through sacrifice, that could, through involvement in a major war, give itself existence and give itself a historical raison d'. Etre. That means this historic moment of war between the European Union, even in a scattered order against Russia, could ensure that we arrive at a European army, a European Ministry of Defense, perhaps a European President. Why not him? A European war that will ensure that Europeans will all die together. And then we will go back to their graves. We will raise the blue flag with the yellow stars. We are in a quasi messianic delirium. I know, but there you have it. The guy is driven by this mission and what is there? Nothing better than a war. Put yourself in his head, put yourself in his shoes with his objective. There is nothing better than a murderous war to seal in blood the act, the true act of creating Europe. That is the idea. So when he spoke, when he spoke, when he spoke about to launch the war, the Allies often derided this position as a misguided attempt by Macron to portray himself as Charles de Gaulle. And in fact, look at how he spoke in a big, In a, in a televised interview with the eliza, he said, Macron, if Russia wins, if Russia wins in Ukraine, that means if he has succeeded, succeeded in finalizing what he has already done by the way of annexing some Russian speaking provinces to Ukraine, over. Okay, he's turning the page. Well, for him, the lives of the French will change. We will no longer have security in Europe. In fact, he absolutely wants to involve all European countries in this story. By the way, on the first page at the beginning of the article, the Wall Street Journal says that Macron has turned into a leading hawk, a false leading camp. That's how we usually describe American neoconservatives who are extremely aggressive, extremely war loving. Well, today, what is the Wall Street Journal telling us? It's not just telling us, it's also telling the Russians that the American hawk is not ours, it's Macron. It's a way for the Americans to wash their hands of this war, just as they have washed their hands of all the wars they've launched. And to say, okay, now the baby has been passed on, or the problem has been passed on to someone else. So I mean, the article is a must read. The only countries that support Macron in his adventure are Poland and the Baltic countries. Not all of them, but the Baltic countries are pretty involved in this. And here we recognize the divisions, the old antagonisms of these countries. This means countries that have had problems with each other that don't date from yesterday. These are peoples who don't necessarily like each other. These are peoples who are crushed by each other. Peoples who have had a run in throughout history. And so at this time today that this story is happening, rivalry comes to the fore and then this instinct to want to fight well is well fed, comes with this war and the. And you'll notice that Ukraine is ultimately just a pretext because. Because frankly, I don't think that before this story there were extremely cordial relations or close or intimate between these countries and Ukraine, while today they are ready to die, to defend it, to sacrifice themselves, to sacrifice their existence. Do you see the thing? So Western capital should stop ruling out military options. Macron declared. There you have it. So Mr. Macron wants it to be known in Russia, to be known everywhere that there will be a military option, that France is ready to go to war. And so look at this also something very interesting. We see that Macron is sending French soldiers because I'm sure there are some at this stage and I'm sure other countries are driving this war. I'm sure the United Kingdom has troops in Ukraine. Look at what's being said. The Biden administration is concerned that Russia is targeting the French unrest French troops. Because obviously if French troops are over prompted in Ukraine, Russia could target them. And we can hear one day, well, a missile fell. There's 60 French soldiers who died. That could happen. And Biden didn't want that. But why doesn't Biden want it? Because Biden doesn't want the war to escalate. Because what Biden wants is to create geostrategic insecurity, sell planes, sell missiles and continue to fuel this eternal tension with Russia. But that's all. He doesn't want to go there. Manu militaire. I mean he's not a die hard. Yes, okay, pretending to wage war. Yes. To do business. Right. Including selling shale gas to the Europeans. Europeans in many European countries don't even have the right to dig and search for shale gas or extract shale gas at home. The laws prohibit them from doing so. Today they bring it back from the United States, paying a price this time. But they ship the gas across the entire Atlantic. Look at the width from the entire Atlantic Basin to consume American gas. Today, the various European capitals that have threatened each other, that are worried about this geostrategic instability, are buying weapons such as planes. And they are not buying in Europe, they are buying in the United States. So you see the thing. You see that he is profiting from the crime. But Biden is not crazy. Biden is not in a messianic hysteria. He is a businessman. So he does his calculations. He says to himself, I will push the war as far as this point, but no further. Up to this point, it is profitable. Up to this point, it is starting to cost money. So he knows a little bit where to set the bar, but not Macron. Look at the Biden administration feared that Russia would target French troops that could be sent to Ukraine, according to a U.S. official. That would risk drawing France and potentially other Western countries into the conflict, the official said. So what do White House officials say? And we don't want the French to get killed there, because then let's imagine that the French get killed. Poland says, well, we're going to defend the French. And then after 24 hours, we have six or seven countries and maybe even the Americans in a real war of confrontation with Russia, a war that will end in a nuclear war. I'll tell you right away. Russia has declared that an attack against it by NATO would mean an asymmetrical attack. That means that many countries are forming a coalition to attack Russia. Russia would not respond conventionally because a conventional attack has no chance. It knows this. It considered that it was a multi on one attack and that the only response would be nuclear. So that's the idea. I'll tell you where it's going if we continue on this path. And look at Macron's betrayal. Macron did tell his allies that there would be no need to involve NATO or the United States if Russia targeted French troops. That clearly means he's telling them, don't worry, I'm sending in French troops. If they get killed, they get killed. Don't move. So I don't understand what French soldier would want to get killed for the Ukrainian flag. I mean, the French soldiers are there to defend France and the French flag. Now they find themselves defending a country where many of them don't even know. If you're on a map, there you have it. And on top of that, they get killed. Well, Macron said, no, don't move. Nobody moves. So there you have it, my friends. So, yeah, this is a scary, scary article about Macron's policies about his headlong rush. And there's something crazy about this guy, but he really risks plunging Europe into the ground. He risks plunging Europe into a war. But that's probably what he wants, because a bloody war would be the real and historical birth certificate of the European Union. Thank you, my friends, and I'll see you in another video. See you soon.