La Belgique libère un égorgeur

Hello, my friends, it's 7am I'll start this day with this video. I'd like to show you this absolutely astonishing news from Belgium right at the beginning. Belgium, I'm saying this for those who aren't watching but are listening to the video. Belgium, a jihadist confesses to beheading a man in Syria. He remains free. Convicted last week of participating in the activities of a terrorist organization, O' Leary walked free from his trial. News 20 minutes. So Belgium is showing us once again that it's an El Dorado, that it's a paradise for jihadists. Just as the Cayman Islands are a tax haven, Belgium is also a jihadist paradise. I remember that Belgium was seen exactly this way in Islamist circles back in the early 90s. Belgium was called Belgica. And no one remembers an Islamist who went to Belgium and for whom the red carpet wasn't rolled out. So if an Arab country had done that, had released a throat slitter, let's imagine that a throat slitter had been, I don't know, in France, for example, beheaded people at the Battaklan. Just to give real examples, imagine that a terrorist had slit people's throats at the Battaclan and then taken refuge in Morocco or Algeria or Tunisia and then emerged free from his trial. You can imagine that the country in question would have been condemned by the nations the, that the UN would have condemned him, and I would say rightly so, because the horror of such a crime should have made this man deserved, should have made him amply deserving of exemplary punishment. But here he is being let go free. Belgium is an extremely dangerous country, in my opinion. It is a country, I can tell you I am very happy that Algeria imposes visa requirements on Belgians. I'm sorry, but the problem is that Belgium is increasingly associated with terrorism. And sooner or later, sooner or later, I think that the international community will have to do something to solve the problem in this country. Because this country on its own seems incapable or unwilling in any case, or even complicit, because it's over. Now. We're on first name terms. We're in a moment of revelation. Before, when we asked them, why do you support terrorists? He would say, but never, ever have we ever supported terrorists. We support moderate rebels, rebels who in the morning fight against Bashar Al Assad's troops and in the afternoon they fight to bring democracy and then peace and freedom to Syria. Quote, that's what he was telling us, while at the same time there are 10 moderate rebels who don't hesitate to slit children's throats and share the videos online. But today, I think the masks have fallen. We are living in a moment of extraordinary revelation, where today the Belgian system, the Belgian justice system, and the Belgian state, I can say, are in absolute, direct collusion with Belgium, with the terrorists. The problem is, as I say, it will attract you. It will attract terrorists from everywhere, because a signal like that, I can tell you, is known. It will probably make the front pages of newspapers in Raqqa, or discussions in cafes or mosques in Raqqa. It will get out. That's what I'm trying to say. Everyone will know that. Well, Belgium, in terms of terrorism is El Dorado. Finally, there was someone who wrote to me yesterday. Well, it's a question that I receive quite regularly. That's why I think it justifies a video. Someone asked me, why couldn't Arab nationalism prevent Islamism? Why couldn't Arab nationalism prevent the collapse of certain countries through Islamism? The problem is that, as you know, every time there's a narrative or a discourse, it inevitably generates a doctrine. But the doctrine of Arab nationalism was a doctrine with feet of clay. It was a doctrine that was going to collapse under the weight of contradiction that came from its generating discourse. The generating discourse had two absolutely contradictory elements in its specifications. It was unnatural to reconcile them or make them coexist. Let me explain. Like all extreme nationalism, Arab nationalism needed an enemy. Who was the enemy? The enemy was, and I would say partly rightly so, Western imperialism. The expression of Western imperialism, the expression, let's say, of the most horrible thing, was from their perspective, from what we call colonialism, another expression was the slave trade. So now they had another problem. They had to denounce what I just described. But they had another problem. The other problem was that the unbridled denunciation of imperialism should not lead to a criticism of Arab Muslim imperialism. Because, in fact, Arab Muslims attacked a lot of countries. They went very far from their borders. They were. They always say, oh, yes, for us, jihad is defensive. No, as Ibn Tayy explains, jihad is not defensive. Jihad is above all offensive. They attack a country that's offensive Jihad. When the inhabitants of that country defend themselves to take back their land, well, then it becomes defensive jihad. Because Muslims say, no, no, you're not going to take back your land. You're attacking us. We're taking it from you. So it's ours, quote. Because if you like, some Muslims, for example, criticize the Israelis who say, God gave us this land, but at least the Israelis, it's a very small Piece of land over which they claim a sort of divine right. Islam in particular claims a divine right over the entire earth. That's the problem. And so when they attacked a land, they took it, it naturally and automatically became theirs by right. And when the inhabitants of that land defended themselves, well, it was a kind of aggression against Islam. And so then jihad became a. Jihad became, uh. There's a guy over there. There's a guy over there. While I'm talking to you, he's at the back of the parking lot. The parking lot is empty at this time. And in fact, it looks like he has a beard. He has a beard and shaved hair. Huh? He's circling around a red car. I don't know what he's doing. Opening the trunk, opening the hood, looking underneath, looking up. In fact, you see the kind of thing, he's got a kind of a slouch, that means no hair and a beard. From a distance, you get the impression that his head has been placed upside down on his car. Ok. And there you go. I just wanted to tell you because in Algeria, he was suspected of preparing a car bomb, you know. Well, the fact remains that you shouldn't always have this kind of ulterior motive. So I was saying. I'm getting back to my topic. Arab nationalists couldn't criticize Islam because that was the limit they had. It was a limit they had on the sand. So, for example, when they criticize colonialism, they'll say that the presence of France In Algeria since 1830 was a crime against humanity, an absolute horror. But at the same time, before that, there were the Ottomans. They'll say that. No, no, no, that's okay. Why? Because they're Muslims. There you go. So they have instilled in the minds of millions of children of entire generations. I was one of them. That you express your nationalism only when you are attacked by a non Muslim, only when you suffer from the imperialism of a non Muslim. But as long as you are attacked by a Muslim, well, that's perfect. He brings you Islam. He brings you the benefits of Islam. It is a privilege to be attacked, to be invaded by Muslims. That's what we were told. Because I was told this at school, I am repeating to you word for word what I was told at school. It is a privilege, it is a chance. When you are attacked by Muslims. And as a victim, let's say as a victim of a Muslim invasion, the best thing you can do is recognize that this invasion is an opportunity for you, and an opportunity because it brings you Islam. There you Go. And so I was saying that at that time they created a nationalism that was a sort of gate that protects a house, but around which there is no wall. That means that you have a house. They built an extremely thick gate that is called Arab nationalism. But in fact the enemy did not need to attack this gate. There was no wall. In fact, they could. So that's what happened, my friends, so that they created a situation. You take Syria for example. But it is valid in many Arab countries. It is that if there are terrorists who land in the name of Islam, many people are ready to join them. Many people will burn their country's flag, burn their country's passport, and then join the terrorists and raise the terrorist flag. I remember in the early 90s there was a guy from Masteganam, an Islamist, who had raised a very large Saudi Arabian flag in his garden. Why? Because it said La Ila Alaha on it. I mean, the police came and took down the flag. I don't think anyone would dare to do that today. But just to tell you that Arab nationalism is a nationalism that is expressed only against the threat that comes from non Muslims. With Islam, Arab nationalism is at a huge disadvantage and totally at a disadvantage. That's the big flaw, let's say, of Arab nationalism. And in Libya, in Libya it worked less well because despite the fact that Mr. Gaddafi had at the time held the same discourse as the other Arab leaders, there still remained a strong sense of belonging. Not to Libya, the Libyans, if you will. The identity structure of this country is not made up of the notions of we are Libyans, but it is made up of we belong to this or that tribe. The tribal system existed in Algeria too. It was just as powerful as Libya. Uh, up until my parents generation, people spoke in terms of tribe, but that faded away. And in fact, that is why Libya, all of it, a part of Libya, remained protected from Islamist attacks. From beating up Libya, because precisely, Mr. Lugan explains it very well. Because precisely here the Libyan identity is made up of belonging not to a nation, but to a tribe. And this tribe is already Muslim in any case. So when someone arrives from outside and wants to attack Libya, people will be more loyal to their tribes than to this terrorist. Whereas Arab nationalism has not succeeded in creating a sufficiently powerful national belonging to confront Islamic imperialism. In a way, that's all there are. We regularly have cases of young people in schools, universities, who do not want, for example, to attend the raising of the flag, who do not want to respect Algerian symbols, who for them, Algeria does not exist. For them Algeria is a land of Allah. And then ideally, there should be a caliph at its head. Huh? That's all. So when terrorist groups arrive and claim to follow a Caliph, I can tell you this guy is ready to show them the way. That's all. That's it, my friends. It's just a little video in the morning and that's it. But I'm going to start my day. See you soon.