
YouTube monologue (Jan 1, 2023) arguing that Western elites are driven less by money than by non-material doctrines—notably theosophy founded by Helena (Elena) Blavatsky—and a desire to become "co-creators" who remake nature and moral order. The speaker traces origins to Blavatsky and late-19th-century theosophy (1885–86), describes a shift from humans-as-creatures to humans-as-co-creators, and links this to contemporary phenomena: gender/medical interventions, genetic modification, geoengineering, and legal/social inversions. The video is presented as an invitation to reflect rather than a definitive theory.
My friends, good morning and happy New Year. I wish you, your families and loved ones joy, happiness and health for the coming year. For me, the transition from December to January is the transition from May to June. It's not anything special, but it's a date that everyone seems to celebrate. So I'm pretending. So today I'm here to tell you a little story. This video didn't last very long, but I'd like to give you the beginning of an explanation. Because we've started the year, our next challenge is to finish it. Because we've realized that the elites who run the west, under whose control the west finds itself, well, every year they find a new obsession, a new destructive hysteria, or each year what they're going to do is find a way to add fuel to the fire. I mean, add more layers, add more and more excess to existing obsessions that will make them increasingly evil.
Okay?
The goal is always to move more and more towards deconstruction or destruction. So in reality, there are a lot of people who ask themselves questions. There are a lot of people who ask themselves questions who say, but then why are they doing this? Why? What is their goal? So some, and the majority, so to speak, try to explain it through money. They'll say, well, of course they want more money. So it's a race for power, it's a race for wealth. So I'm not completely convinced by this explanation because it doesn't stand up to analysis. In fact, because if we do an analysis, even a superficial one, we'll notice that all these, all these self proclaimed elites have won by a large margin, even unfairly. But these elites have won the race for wealth. They've won the race for power. And the last person in there has accounts, huge bank accounts, properties and extremely extensive power. And so doing all this to add to their wealth. No, that's not really how these elites think. Because this thinking, saying they do it for the money, is the thinking of broke people, so to speak. And there are billions of us who are broke. Just because you have a salary or you're an executive or a top executive doesn't mean you're not broke. Compared to these people, we're all broke like us are.
Okay?
You shouldn't do that unless you're part of the 1% of the 1%, you're broke. So the thinking of being broke means that. Yes. Then these people are doing all this to increase their wealth simply because it's a thinking made by projection. Be very careful with this thinking. Whether you're doing a geopolitical analysis or a personal analysis, whether you're analyzing problems with, I don't know, problems with your partner, with your wife, with your children, there's a way of thinking that is eminently dangerous because it constantly gives false results. I'll tell you right away, this is the way to say this to yourself. If I had done that, huh? Someone says something or does something and it offends you, it shocks you, it hurts you, it upsets you, it disappoints you. Whatever you say to yourself, if I had done that, well, why would I do it? So, for example, you see people destroying the world, creating wars, destroying generations, destroying even people's mental health. And you say, if I had to do what they did, why would I do it? You see? So you're going to think about it in terms of your own parameters. So you say, hey, you're not a billionaire. So you say, well, maybe I'll do it to make money. And at that point you start with that explanation, and then you do it for others in your personal life and everything. But that's very dangerous because it gives false results. On the contrary, you have to put yourself in the person's shoes. You have to get into the person's mind, get into their life, their parameters, their way of seeing the world. You have to get out of yourself, and that's a very difficult exercise. You have to get out of yourself and put yourself in the other person's shoes to see how the other person acts and why they act the way they do. When you take people, I don't know, the boss of Amazon who is extremely rich or similar, people who own islands, mansions, private jets, bank accounts and all that, they could spend a million dollars a day until they die. Their fortune won't even be touched. They don't do things for the money. They have other problems than money. What's their problem? One of their problems, for example, they think there are too many of us. Okay, for example, just one example. Because there are things that money can buy, and there are things that money can't buy. Honestly, there are things. If you have the money, literally any extravagance that comes to mind, you can buy it. Yes or no? That's right, you can buy it. There are things that you can't buy. For example, you can't empty the earth. You can't create a vacuum.
Okay?
So if you buy your child the latest Ferrari or the latest Bentley, and then he goes to test drive it with his friends on the highway and he gets stuck in a traffic jam, you know, you say he couldn't even use it. We paid him 5 million euros for it, but he couldn't even use it. He got stuck for two hours on the highway.
Okay?
So ideally, what would you have wanted? You would have wanted the highway to be empty just for him.
Okay?
And money doesn't buy that. That's very hard. That's where you have to reason like this. That's the first point. That's an important point. Secondly, before the Western world was brought back to the situation it is in today, it was worked ferociously. It was worked ferociously to remove all connection with anything that is not material. Now, materialism has its limits. Materialism, huh? When we say that these elites are chasing money, what are we ultimately doing? We are providing a purely materialistic explanation for this problem. Are we really sure that they are chasing money? Are we sure that materialism will explain what is happening? Materialism has one characteristic. Materialism is eminently associated with factuality. It is eminently associated with a form of logic, of rationality. However, if you look at what is happening, what is happening is not necessarily logical. The destruction that is happening is not necessarily logical. What is it like? It is clearly linked to a dogma, to a cult. It is linked to a dimension other than the dimension. He wants more power, he wants more money.
Okay?
But unfortunately, we have a hard time projecting ourselves there as a society. I am not talking about individuals, but as a society. We have a hard time understanding this because we are disconnected from all of this. We are disconnected from the spiritual, we are disconnected from the non material. So we try to explain everything on a material level. And as soon as the material level reaches its limits and we cannot explain, well, we are lost. We are completely lost. Let me give you an example. Let me give you an example, a start of explanation. I'm not saying that this is the explanation with a capital E. I'm saying that this is a line of research that I'm giving you. Look at some of the historical figures who influenced many decision makers, who influenced many people who run the world. So does speak. We're going to find a personality from the 1800s, in fact, the end of the 1800s, who was called Elena Blavatsky. Blavatsky created what is called the secret doctrine. This doctrine, a book that is available, will influence a lot of people in the west, and in particular among what are called the elites. Blavatsky founded theosophy. She created a theosophical school in the United States. Then I think the headquarters were moved to India. This was in 1885, 1886, towards the end of the 1800s. What is at the heart of theosophy? There's something very important. Theosophy announces, and you'll see that this will explain everything. Theosophy announces a change of air re. It announces that the universe, or humanity, has entered a new age. We have changed ages. We haven't changed centuries or years or eras, but we have changed ages. What was before, what was after, going back to 1885, Western humanity in particular. Even if in some places in the world, people didn't live very differently than in the Middle Ages or even in prehistory. But if we look at the west, if we look at the United States, Germany, France, England, humanity had achieved a certain mastery. Parisian apartments were extremely comfortable, well heated. There were street lamps on the roads. We could cross the oceans in extremely comfortable boats. Medicine, technology, science had made absolutely extraordinary progress. People's comfort had advanced like never in history. In some ways, there were things that worked much better than they do now, at least back then. They had the doctor who came to the house, and they didn't have Macron on TV. So somewhere in 1885, they were looking for the inventions that they had at the time. Looking for what, by the way, a huge number of inventions that were there at the time still exist today, but just in a more evolved form. That's all. So what happened once we reached the end of the 1800s? We had the West. And when I say the West, I'm talking about its elites. You know, I'm not talking about the average person. The west entered a new age where, starting with the secret doctrine of Elena Blavatsky, it began to theorize a certain number of extremely dangerous ideas. One of the ideas is the. That humans today, or if we look before and after, before humans were creatures, they were divine creatures created by God. And this creature was ultimately subject to the vagaries of the universe, left all alone, literally. If we look at the biblical or Quranic texts or others, we have Mr. Adam and his wife Eve, who were literally left naked on the earth. So it's a form of abundance, abandoned on a land that was hostile. It must be said. They didn't even have a roof over their heads. So they had to work. They had to work their descendants and all that, to try to find comfort and to try to find shelter. The problem is that this went on for generations and generations. For generations, humans suffered. Humans were taken by surprise. Humans tried to master nature, and they were taken by surprise. And they discovered the Laws of physics and the laws of nature, through trials and failures, through trials that could have cost him his life, his health, and many other things. But little by little, he advanced. Generation after generation, he advanced by millimeters. Millimeters, Millimeters. He arrived in 1885, and at that time he considered that he had reached not necessarily a peak, but considered that he had reached a degree of development, a degree of mastery of the universe, of mastery of the laws of physics, of the natural laws around him, so that now he could enter a new age. Listen carefully to this one, where he was no longer really a creature, but a co creator. That means before this era, before, in the previous age, man was a divine creature. After this age, man was a co creator. With God, there is God who creates. But man becomes a co creator because now he has a mastery that allows him to access, in part, not totally, that will come in the future as he thinks, but he can access a part of divine power. And at that moment he enters into a kind of divine dignity where he becomes a divinity. And for example, we can find. This is why what people perceive from the outside as deconstructions, in reality, it is just man, the elite, always Western, who creates or recreates the world in his image. Because before we had the world in the divine image, but today we have man. We are in post modernism. If we go very far, we can. We can. We can talk about Fry Nietzsche and we can say that we can go even further. He affirmed that God is literally dead, but in fact God is dead or partially dead. And now we have the new man who is arriving. The new man is a creator in his own right, or co creator. If we want to keep the moderate version of the theosophists. God, for example, created. If we look at the natural order, God created man and woman, man and woman. He created two genders. But how many can the co creator create? Can he create? 50? Huh? Look around you today. What do you think? Do you think that we encourage everything we encourage out of excess freedom, excess libertarianism, outside of respect for minorities? Do you really believe that? No. No. If you believe that, go make yourselves a coffee. Wake up. Wake up, guys. This is creation. When we want to manipulate human DNA, what's the logic behind it? Huh? It's because we want to heal. We want to care for people. I can start this car. I'll take you to the emergency room. You'll see the state it's in. People who were sleeping on the ground, others who waited for four or five hours in an ambulance, hospitals that were Closed. Medical staff who were at their wits end, who weren't paid well, who went on strike, who left, who changed by profession. Who leaves the profession completely? It's raining. They must have cans at the hospital. What do you believe? Believe that all this is what we do? We manipulate DNA to improve health? No, it's to create man. It's. I can. I can modify man now because I am a creator. When you look at Sweden and others. Very official, huh? What I'm telling you is not a conspiracy. Very official. They throw metal powder and so on into the sky and everything. With planes. I'm not talking about. I'm not saying oil planes, no, very specific missions. Well, designed to launch this, to change the sunlight on the earth. What logic does that follow? When we take seeds and all that, and then we're going to make GMOs out of them, what logic does that follow? Okay, I don't understand. It's not all that comes from money. So of course, lower down, Lower down, there is monetization. That means that at the top, what do we have at the top? We have dogma, we have religion. It must be said, it is religion, literally, that is at the top. But then when we cascade down and we make people work. When we make people work, what jobs? Operatives. We will not be able to recruit the operative on the basis of a doctrine. He will not work there. He is materialistic. He wants to get paid now. So we monetize. So we will tell him, yeah, but there is money in it for you, okay? Because we know that if we look at it from the elite's point of view, we know that he's a loser. We know that he just wants cash and everything. So at that point, when these doctrines cascade into society, or cascade into the economy and civil society, they will sometimes dress up in the clothes of an economic plan or things that bring in money or whatever. That's why on a superficial reading, we can say that it brings in money, but in fact, no, that's not the goal, huh? Look, today we take children. There are families who take their children. They declare the boy, he declares it's a girl, the girl declares it's a boy. And then they put them in a medical circuit where they will be. Where they will be medicalized for life and all that. So, yes, it brings in money. Yes, it brings in money. Of course it brings in passions for life. It pays for clinics, it pays. And even the popes of these theories and doctrines say that it pays. But that's at the level of the poor that's at the level of the executor, because the executor wants money. But when you're at the top, you're in a different logic. We're co creators and that's also why we're going to find an attack literally against all the laws that were previously called divine. When all the so called laws of nature, just for example, you take a country like France, where the squatter for example, has more rights than the owner. It's simply a way of inverting values. We're experiencing an inversion of values. We're literally experiencing the cross upside down. Some people will say it's a form of Satanism. Why not? We have to dig deeper. Why not? Is that what Helena Blavatsky came up with? The idea that I am now a co creator with God? Isn't that a form of Satanism? That's debatable. Possibly, possibly. Of course. But this explanation that I'm giving in this video. This video won't get 200,000 views. I'll tell you that right away. This video, you'll see, follow along. You'll see it's a video that will stall at 18,000 views, 20,000 views, then stop there, and then, and then you watch it. Five years later, it's at 21,000. Why? Because today's average Westerner doesn't have this kind of explanation in their heart. They don't know we've worked on them enough to distance them from these explanations. However, it's this kind of explanation that allows us to understand those who are at the very top. But you can imagine that those who, those at the very top wouldn't want us to understand their logic, wouldn't want us to understand how they work, why they work. But what I personally invite you to do, this video is just an invitation to reflect. I'm not even giving you the finished product and I'm just giving you an invitation to reflect by setting a few milestones, by giving a few examples. But I invite you to go further. Think around you, look around you and try to see that in the light of what I've just told you, there are many things that will make sense. Thank you in any case for watching this video so far. You know, I made this video because I made it. Because sometimes friends who criticize me, sometimes they tell me, I watched your last video. That's good. That's good. I like what you did. But you avoided or barely suggested certain non material explanations. But you didn't get to the heart of the matter. You were afraid and that's true. I agree. Sometimes I think to myself, will they understand? So sometimes I try to explain things by telling myself, go as far as you think. The majority will understand, you see? But this time I'm going straight to it. It's 2023. It's over. New resolution. Come on, new resolution. New resolution. It's love one another. There you go. And then we're going to obey the decree of Providence and keep the faith. It's very important because we mustn't live in worry, in fear, because these people are losers. I'm telling you, these people are losers because they're not co creators. They, they're losers. That's all. They're just losers. That's all, okay? And it's very important because worry, Worry is the opposite of faith. Because worry is believing in the forces of evil, believing that they're the ones who are going to win. That's what worry is living in. Worry is living with that conviction. And that's destructive, okay? We're not going to believe that these people are going to win because they can't win. They're losers. Look at their faces. Look at your people's faces. But honestly, I, I don't like using that kind of terminology. But look at your people's faces, okay? Look, many of them, look at their gestures, look at their mannerisms, look at their physique. You can see that they're crazy. They're just crazy. They're just losers, okay? They're going to fall flat on their faces. But until that day comes, we're going to have to keep the faith and stay strong.
Okay?
Thank you, my friends. And then I'll see you in another one, in another video. Wait.
More from Aldo

La FIN du Royaume-Uni ? L'Ecosse, l'Irlande du Nord et le Pays de Galles veulent partir !

Analyse Présidentielles 2027 : Marine le Pen remet ENCORE le voile sur la table !

Scandale "60 Millions de Consommateurs" : la France mange des pâtes contaminées au Cadmium !

2 dossiers : Accident d'autogyre en Italie & un pilote sauvé par le parachute du Cirrus






