A monologue questioning common anti-Saudi sentiment and Islamophobia in the West. The speaker argues that recent terrorist attacks in Europe were not carried out by Saudis, critiques the tendency to scapegoat Saudis (and the official narratives around 9/11), and invites listeners to reconsider who the real sources of violent extremism are.
Hello, my friends, after this video, there are a lot of people who are going to say that I was bought by the Saudis. That's why, before I start, I want to tell you that this is not true. In fact, I've been thinking about this lately and something struck me as obvious. Something suddenly struck me. You know, that when we are threatened, when we live in a time like ours, it is very easy to want to, or to give in to the temptation to point the finger at an enemy. While sometimes in the rush, we point at the wrong enemy. And we focus everything on that.
In.
The world we live in, in the West. Racism, stigmatization, I mean, all this vocabulary of the Socialist Party and the institutions that generally revolve around it is frowned upon.
Ok?
Except that when it comes to stigmatizing or being racist towards Saudis, it seems to be something completely normal.
Okay?
It's something that seems to have become normal. And indeed, I think I've been guilty of this for a very long time. I think I've let myself be carried away by this train of thought, even though I always try, as I say, to think for myself. But you see that sometimes we get carried away. So I've been thinking about something very simple recently. If I take the attacks of the last 10 years, okay, for Paris, can you take the recent attacks of infamous memory. How many people took part in these attacks? How many of the terrorists were Saudis or had a parent who was Saudi or had lived in Saudi Arabia or were of Saudi origin, even if only through their great grandparents? The answer is zero. There is no agreement. There is none foreign. The Saudis, despite everything we might think of them, despite the fact that they may have a way of life that is extremely different from others, despite the fact that the average person in Europe would not be able to live in this country for 15 days, find any form of happiness or balance or stability. Despite all the strange things that we do not understand, there is one thing that we cannot blame them for and that is committing terrorist attacks. You might ask me, yes, but what do you make of September 11th? What do you make of September 11th? Well, September 11th is indeed a day when I study geostrategy, physics, chemistry, sociology, anything. I avoid using 9-11-8 as a reference because it is a day when, from midnight to midnight, all the laws that we know try to apply. By the way, I'm going to tell you something. Recently. Recently. Recently there was a group that wanted to file a complaint against Saudi Arabia. It got pretty high profile. It was something very serious. They wanted to file a complaint against Saudi Arabia to demand compensation. Because according to the official version, it was their citizens who committed the breast attacks in September. So people wanted to get into this breach and file a complaint against Saudi Arabia. And you know what happened? Obama vowed to protect Saudi Arabia. Of course, that didn't help the Saudi cause because a lot of people will say, look at the Saudis. They bought Obama and everything. He sold him to Saudi Arabia and all that. Well, that's the version that the stable shmut wants us to believe. But there's another, much more sinister version. Why do you think Mr. Obama would have protected Saudi Arabia? Actually, no, it wasn't Saudi Arabia that protected him. Protecting his establishment. He was protecting himself and people like him. Because if the case had ended up in court, even if it was just because of this Saudi Arabian note, if it had ended up in court, there would have been expert opinions, counter expertise, experts, testimonies, the official version scrutinized with a fine tooth comb by people who are completely uncompromising, by people who want to dismantle it in a scientific way, in a way that is acceptable and accepted in a court of law. And indeed, Obama did not want it to go that way because he knows very well that if we start airing dirty linen in court and if we start bringing out all the half truths, lies and secrets of the American establishment that day, it would indeed not be Saudi Arabia that would end up in the dock, but rather the American stable schmet. So in fact, he wanted to protect himself. That's all. Hey, because the Saudis know they have money, they know they're defending themselves, and it's clear that they were going to recruit the best law firms in the United States and in Navarre, and that the establishment was really struggling to stay the course in the midst of all this. So there you have it. But the last time, let's say we heard about a Saudi theorist, it was in September. It's probably the last time, and probably the first time too, because I haven't found any attacks committed by Saudis before. So that's what made me start thinking, asking myself, is it really Wahhabism? Is it really the Islam of Saudi Arabia? Who is the problem? Isn't something else the problem?
Today.
I invite everyone to reflect on this subject and look at recent news and try to trace, it's quite easy trace where Islam comes from, this Islam of death that is causing terror in France.
Okay.
And in Belgium too, and elsewhere, even in D. You can go and see where they come from.
Okay?
Where do they come from there. They are the cross between cross and cross. Where do they come from? What is their deep root? There you have it. That's all. It's something that struck me as a truth. I think that by pointing out the wrong enemies, we just waste our energy and find an ideal culprit and then take out our frustration on them. But deep down. Deep down we are far from reality.
