La Hallalisation Climatique : le Scandale

Hello, my friends. I'm here to make a video from Paris. I'm in Paris, traveling very quickly for a project. You'll hear more about it next week. But today I'd like to show you why I make videos from my car in the United Kingdom. Listen to the sound. You see a slight echo, okay? I don't really like that echo. And there's no way to get rid of it in post production without degrading the sound quality, of course. So today I'd like to talk to you about a very interesting study by the Guardian, a British newspaper. It's a study that was done by one of the branches of Greenpeace, okay? And it's about the climate, okay? As you know, the climate is a new religion today, a kind of new religion on the basis of which the west is destroying its economy, its well being and the future of its generations. As you know, 99.99% in some of the carbon dioxide on Earth is of natural origin. Just one exploding volcano can easily generate 100 or 200 years of human activity in one day, okay? In terms of carbon dioxide, there is a cycle, okay? There is a natural cycle that has existed for millions of years, or billions of years, if you like. In this cycle, we have ideologues who are grafted and. And then behind them, of course, the financiers. Because you have to know one thing, these days, every time you have ideologues who are sent out to scout, they are the ones who are going to prepare the way for the financiers who come behind. So today I found a very interesting article in the GR. I was saying they analyzed 50 of these climate change companies. So what is climate change? You know that Muslims eat halal meat. It's their kosher meat, if you like. And in fact, companies that are in the meat business want this label because it will open the door to a new clientele. So of course, all companies are chasing labels, whether they're organic, kosher, climate friendly, etc. All of that is part of the race to attract consumers today. We have to show consumers that we have a clean bill of health, which generally allows us to turn a blind eye to the quality of the product. Because often we'll have a sort of compensatory attitude. We have a product that may be expensive, that may not be competitive in terms of quality, that may not be a product that would stand up. But what we're going to do is we're going to try to add labels to the box to make it more attractive. So Halal is one of those labels. What is happening today is that there are a lot of pharmacies that will accept money in exchange for a label. This does not mean that these people who have accepted the money have verified or validated the circumstances or conditions of production or validated adherence to any religious protocol. It is quite simply, you pay, it is time per label. There you go. You pay the money. You use my name and there you go. I am registered, I have a phone number, I have a website. That's all. It is as simple as that. We live in an economy, my friends, that is extremely cynical. It always has been. It always has been. Except that today it is accelerating. So at the same pace on the same regime or the same scheme, if you will. We have airlines that want to show their credentials. Sometimes they want to show their credentials for purely ideological reasons, to try to show that they are more work than w. To try to say, yes, we are climate friendly, things like that. These could be companies that ask passengers to pay extra for carbon. They'll say, if you pay extra on your ticket, we'll remove the carbon that was generated by your existence by your flight that day. We understand each other. Okay, so what they're going to do with it is take money. And what are they going to do with it? So the airlines are going to buy the Halal label. That means they're going to go to companies. And now things are getting heated today because, my friends, I'm going to tell you something. I and you, I want to say that we didn't understand anything about this whole thing. Because if we had understood, luckily, look, if I had understood, what would I have done instead of being there making a video against these companies? Well, I would have kissed them. That means today I can create a company that does climate change. I pocket money, I become a millionaire, and that's it. Easy. That's how it works today. So what happens? They analyzed 50 campaigns. They analyzed 50 companies. And why 50? They're the biggest ones. They took in terms of the money they receive. They took the 50 biggest companies that receive this money to sell climate change, who claim, who say that in exchange for the money, we're going to fight climate change and we have ways to stop emissions or recover them or whatever. Okay? Because this is taking on completely staggering proportions, my friends. So billions are being circulated. So I'll tell you about the 50 companies. They found that 38, only 80% were junk. It was qualified. No companies that were insufficient or not doing enough or needed to improve. No, no, it was considered junk. Trash. That's the term that was used in finance. When we use the term junk, it typically means that we use it for shares of companies that have gone bankrupt or are about to collapse and all that. They tell you that's it. It's junk. It's not even. I'm not even going to analyze the short term and the long term and the fundamentals and all that. It's paper. It's worth absolutely nothing. If you put it in your portfolio tomorrow, you won't get your money back. It's over. So that's 38 junk out of C. Now, they looked further and they found that eight others. Okay. In fact, eight others. Yeah. Are problematic. Potentially junk, potentially trash. Okay? That means that really there are almost all the companies they found three for which there were not enough documents, enough data, enough transparency to be able to assess their impact. And some of these companies were even, as Greenpeace says, detrimental, had a negative effect on the ecological cycle and all that because they themselves actually pollute. So you see, that means out of 50, we have 38 guaranteed trash, we have eight possible trash, and we have three that are not. So here we are not talking about an accident. We are. We are talking about the result of a system. We are talking about a system that is naturally based on lies, naturally based on fraud, naturally based on embezzlement, based on plunder. And then all of this, of course, under an ideological cover. And we generally send anxious young people who do not know what they are getting into, what sauce they are getting into. And they are demanding more slavery, demanding more taxes, demanding more restrictions from a state that is doing just that anyway, a sprawling state, a fat state, they are demanding that they go even further in this direction. So, in fact, it is clear. It is like taking an alcoholic who demands that he drink more, that he drink more. He will just go in this direction anyway. Don't worry. You don't need to push it. To give you an example of how far this hysteria can go in New York, they recently had, you may have seen the images on Twitter, they had torrential rain, and this caused flooding in the subway and in homes and all that. Why? Because the sewer system in New York, you know, is a bit like many big cities. I think that, well, Paris, I. I think in terms of sewers is famous around the world for the oversized sewers. But many cities were built and grew very quickly and had a large population too quickly. And so the sewer system that was built a long time ago is no longer up to the task. So New York is no exception, and it really needs to be upgraded. Investment is needed. When Americans visit the United States, you see that in many cities, the infrastructure is in an advanced state of disrepair. In the United Kingdom, too, it is a country that invests a lot in the war effort. They are constantly at war with a country, a people, or even sometimes completely imaginary threats in which they invest billions, they spend it, they waste it. They don't really waste it. It goes into other pockets. We understand each other. It's always a matter of taking money from the taxpayer, and then it goes to the pockets of the super rich who become even richer. But we understand each other. They don't invest in their infrastructure. And you know what the city authorities say to people who say, oh, my goodness, if we have to invest billions in sewers, well, let's invest now. Let's start working on the sewers. Let's start preventing flooding every few years, which is an extremely reasonable request from the population. Do you know what we would have said? No. We think that if we have to invest, if we have to invest in sewers, it would take billions and billions to get there. So we prefer to invest in climate, okay? We prefer to invest in climate so that once the Earth's climate stops changing, well, we won't have rain, and then there's no need to upgrade the sewers. So you see how disconnected these people are from reality. Okay? These are people who are, of course, what they say. They are cynics. They don't necessarily believe it. There are a lot of people, you know, I can go out there in the street, I can grab about 50 people. I can give them €50,000 each. I can tell you they can start to believe in a lot of things. All you have to do is tell them, and then they come in front of the camera and they will inevitably defend it. So when you give billions more to people, not only will they reach the stage, they will sometimes no longer play this cynical game, but they will really start to believe in what they are saying. There you have it, my friends. This was a pretty funny story, and I wanted to share it with you because it gives you a pretty accurate idea of this entire industry that is fundamentally based on fraud. I'll see you in the next video and see you very soon, my friends. Mister.