La schizophrénie migratoire : JMLP avait raison...

Hello, my friends. Here I allow myself a little luxury. I'm going out in this car when there's no gas. Right now the tank is a little below half full and I haven't seen any gas at the pump for almost 10 days. The rare pumps that do bring gas, they've been stormed. Sometimes there are fights, police intervention, all that. In fact, we literally live in East Germany and I personally think that there's nothing abnormal about that, that we're starting to resemble what we really are. You see, there are two types of alcoholics. So there are two types of alcoholics. There's the functional alcoholic and the non functional alcoholic. And in all the types of people that you can find, there's the functional and the non functional. You have the functional alcoholic who still manages to hide his alcoholism, who manages to go to work, who manages not to stink of alcohol, who manages to hide the fact that he starts drinking at 8am and so on. And then you have the functional noun non functional. That's it, he's fine. You can find him thrown on the pavement, it's over. He's doing it all over himself and all that. He's no longer trying to pretend. So in fact, the deterioration of many Western countries, including the United Kingdom, began a long time ago, but before we managed to pretend, that's the idea. Before we were functional, we were a sort of functional East Germany. Today we are increasingly becoming a non functional East Germany. Because you have to know one thing. You have to know that when you disconnect from reality, which is the case in a lot of Western countries, and in fact it's a psychological flaw that's very, uh, how should I say it, very visible, commonplace in reality. Because as soon as someone, as soon as someone starts to become strong, starts to have a lot of money, a lot of servants, a lot of, a lot of strength, in fact, they start to feel, let's say no, bound by reality. Because the reality they live, they created according to what they decide. When you're an ordinary citizen, when you're like you and me, I mean, we wake up in the morning, we suffer what we suffer. Part of the day we organize ourselves, but part of it is endured. Many conditions are endured. Now if you take people who are extremely rich, extremely powerful, extremely well versed in economics, politics and all that, they can have the sinking feeling that reality doesn't affect them, that they create their own reality. And after a while they start to develop ideas that move in this direction, moving further and further away from the constraints of the laws of physics. Mathematics, the rules of economics and all that. There you have it. That's a bit of a problem. So in the United Kingdom, you, you see, it's been a good 10 years since anyone has wanted to tackle or solve a real problem. We have parties that run campaigns on non existent problems. Do you see why? Because there's a disconnect. This disconnect allows the public, the media, politicians and decision makers to invent problems that are most often classified as ideological. And we even end up having ecological. Ideological investments. I meant ideological. And then in the end. Well, in the end, we all end up paying the price, which is what is happening today. We end up being less and less functional. To tell you something else, to tell you something. And here I think that time is proving Jean Marilla Penn, right. You know, Jean Marie Le Pen had communicated a lot about the fact that one of the reasons why a certain number of countries encouraged migration was to be able to influence wages. And in fact, was he right? Was he wrong? Today, when we look at the experience of the United Kingdom, it tends to validate what he said. Why I told you about the fuel problems and all that. Because we had British drivers who were earning 200 pounds a day who were replaced by Polish drivers who were earning less. Then the Polish drivers started demanding more because they realized that we were ripping them off with extremely arduous and difficult work. And all that while paying them very little, they started demanding more. We fired them, we brought back the ruse. And then after Brexit, we can't bring anyone back. So what's happening? Bam. We have fuel in the refineries. We can't deliver it.

Okay.

Uh, yesterday I read that British farmers and breeders were going to kill and throw away 120,000 pigs. That's a start. Why? Because there's no staff in the slaughterhouses to take care of it. That means that today, when a farmer wants to take his animals to the slaughterhouse, when he calls the slaughterhouse to ask for a slot to take his animals, because that's how it works, right? It's not the farmer who kills the animals in question. That's what's done at the slaughterhouse. The problem is that at the slaughterhouse there's no more room. They say, no, we can't because we don't have the staff, okay? So they're going to have to destroy them. And tomorrow they're going to end up destroying chickens, and the day after tomorrow, sheep. And the day after tomorrow, I don't know what. And then the day after tomorrow we won't have any food in the supermarket, and it's already started. In fact, there is an addiction. It's real. It's not just imaginary, it's not a theory. There is a real addiction to cheap labor. Now, beyond this addiction, what is there? There is something else. When you have a country, take any country, imagine any country, xy, you have an economy, let's say rudimentary, that doesn't work. Ah, it's misery. It's the doom and gloom for everyone. So indeed, you have people who work for one euro a day or one euro an hour. There are countries like that. So they work for that price, for that salary, because in any case, there is no choice. There is no more, There is no.

Okay.

Now, as the economy develops, people demand higher salaries, and that's normal. Why do they want higher salaries? Because they want to be paid, to be compensated their fair share of the economic fortunes. That's normal.

Okay?

That's where the problem lies. And that's where you're going to understand a little bit about what's happening in the West. In the west, when the economy takes off and economic revenues start to increase and there's good revenues, there's a desire not to share, There's a desire not to share. That means that in fact, the various economic players don't have the slightest desire to pay the worker, the one who creates, the one who is really the hand behind this economy. They don't want to pay them, they don't want to share with them. So what do they do? They're going to oust them in favor of cheaper labor. So he's going to bring in a workforce from elsewhere and then oust the worker who has higher demands. There you go. You go home. We bring in a foreign workforce who takes less, and so everyone does it. So that in reality, there is an economic boom which allows what allowed, for example, Macron to say during the debate between the first and second rounds of the presidential elections to tell Marine Le Pen, yes, but you're completely delusional. We are a G7 country, we are a very rich country, and so on. Yes, there is wealth. Well, there is real wealth, but it is not shared. It is not shared properly. So the thing is that we are putting pressure on wages by bringing in people who are ready to work for less. And when these people themselves start to wake up, open their eyes and ask for more money, well, it's very simple. We replace them with even cheaper ones, you see. So the thing is, today, all we have to do is say, well, all we have to do is say what some people thought. Well, there's Brexit. You can't bring in foreign workers. Oh, well, you just have to pay people a fair wage. Oh, yes, but wait, it's not as simple as that. Because the problem is that the entire production chain and the entire economy behind it have become addicted to workers who have been built around work that is bought below its value. So we can't just increase it. Let me give you an example. Let's imagine that now we say, well, we're going to need dairy products. Sorry? Well, now you buy milk. You buy it, I don't know, at the equivalent of €1 per liter at the supermarket. Sorry, you're now going to have to buy it at €3 per liter because you're going to have to pay people a fair wage. The people in the production chain are going to have to pay them. You're going to have to pay them their fair wage. So let's say €3 per bed. So that's easy to say, but what does it mean in practice? In practice, it means that since in society. Since in society, everyone has been cheated at their level, everyone, everyone is robbed of the fruits of their labor. So you're going to have, for example, the nurse, well, she doesn't work in the dairy industry. She goes to the supermarket to buy her milk at €3 per liter. She might not be able to buy it. Why? Because her own salary has been lowered by nurses who were brought back from Laos, Thailand and so on. You can have the train driver who arrives. Well, he too, he won't be able to because his salary has also been destroyed. In fact, everyone has been robbed at their level by this system. And in fact, this system is very expensive in reality, but it is very expensive for society as a whole.

Because.

In order to obtain this cheap labor, well, there is damage in the process. There is social damage. There is a social divide that is created. There is a divide. There are cities, there are neighborhoods that live completely in autarky. It is a social divide that has to be paid for. Sometimes when we bring back, when we go to countries where we have labor, we have an economy that is not very good, that is not doing very well. This economy is not going to produce quality labor for you, is it? So, for example, we bring back 100 people from this economy, and then, clever as you may be, we might end up with five or six working. What do the other 94 or 95 do? We'll have to take care of them. Okay, so in reality, the Savings we make on five people who work, huh? I'm talking nonsense. I. I'm saying five. It could be 12, it could be 15, I don't know. But the savings we make on those who work will never compensate for the others we have to take care of.

Okay?

It doesn't matter because they're not the same ones who pay. They're not the same ones who earn. They're not the same ones who pay. It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter if there's someone who earns €10,000 on a payroll. If society as a whole has to pay €1,000,000. €1,000,000 to compensate for that €10,000. It's €10,000. It's €10,000 in savings. He doesn't care at all because he makes €10,000 in savings, while society as a whole pays a million. We don't care, Understand? That's why I think Western countries are living in a state of migratory schizophrenia.

Okay?

We recently had these problems between Algeria and France, and they're still going strong. They're escalating. Algeria has just banned French military aircraft flying over its airspace to Mali, among other places. So things are escalating. There is an escalation, but in reality, if we look at the French side, there is a migratory schizophrenia. This means that on the one hand, the French authorities, led by Macron and the others who came before them, are calling for migration, calling for migration of their wishes and organizing it, right? When they started seeing waves of migration, they discussed it. They even promised sanctions to countries that did not take any. France wanted to sanction Hungary and other countries that did not want migrants. They wanted to sanction them to the tune of €200,000 per migrant who took part. Do you understand? So France really organized illegal immigration in Europe. So the biggest supplier of illegal migration in Europe is France. Germany too, of course. So on the one hand, it is bringing back illegal migration. We know why, right? It is for their economy. We need their economy. We need to do this in a logic of dispossession. There you go. So then they are left with what is called in the industry, the broken ones. That means that they have a part of this migration that they brought back. Once they bring it back and they sort it quickly. Well, this one can work, this one can be placed, this one can do something that we can use politically and in the media. He seems very interesting, right? Do you understand what I'm talking about? So there are these kinds of things afterwards, and the rest, There are the rest, the rest they would like other countries, to take them back. Do you see what I mean? They sell the same thing. So there are people who told me in the comments that Algeria, I think they were presented with 7700 migrants saying they were Algerians, and Algeria refused them. Wow. It reminds me of when I was in court. I would sometimes listen to the court sessions. I liked that. And in fact, sometimes because of his naivety, sometimes because of his naivety or his clumsiness, the defendant will say something that is so against him that it sometimes makes the audience laugh. And then the president has to hit the gavel like that to calm things down a little bit. And sometimes he forbids the audience from reacting. If I hear the slightest reaction, I'll throw you all out. In fact, they presented 7700 people to Algeria last year. I want to ask, where did you find 7,700 people? Because if we take a normal country, I don't know if I take any country, okay? But I take a normal country. There aren't 7,700 Algerians wandering around like that without papers. And here, and here, I say 7700. Just the presumed Algerians. If I add the presumed Moroccans, the presumed Tunisians, the presumed Afghans, the presumed Libyans, the presumed Peruvians, uh, I mean, 7,700 per country per year, that's going to be a lot. That means that in reality, France is saying, I don't have any borders. There you go. I, I don't have any borders because I don't know, if you take countries that control their borders a little bit, you can comb the entire country, all nationalities combined, you won't end up with 7700 people.

Okay?

So if in Paris alone you get to 7700 people just based on a presumed nationality, that's still not very many. It means that in reality there is a problem, which is that your borders don't exist. Your borders are open. And this idea of leaving the borders open and then capturing people when you can and sending them to embassies in the hope that they will take them back, that idea doesn't exist. It's an illusion. It's heresy. In fact, it won't happen like that. So there you have it. There is a schizophrenia. In fact, you see a schizophrenia because France has so much France, let's say, let's put it this way, in the United Kingdom, salaries are better than in France. Despite everything I've talked about, exfoliation and all that, salaries are much higher here than in France. But beyond that, what can I say?

If.

I mean by the two countries, the United Kingdom and France are not at the same level, let's say, of plunder. France has reached a level of plundering of its citizens, such that ultimately, if it wants to cut the salary of a French person, it won't work. By reducing it to polls or.

Okay.

It won't work. We'll really have to find a bot people. And below the bot people, you won't find anyone who will work for less than a French person. Uh, the proof, the proof is that sometimes, sometimes, uh, there were migrants who were in Calais, there were services, the prefecture and everything who were begging to stay in France and they didn't want to. Do you see what that means? People who are Calais have sometimes crossed continents to get there and they are in France. They say, no, no, I'm not going to go to France, I'm going to go to the United Kingdom. Do you understand? That means a right. It really means a lot. So listen, it's a very dangerous game that politicians and economic players are playing. They don't give a damn about the long term result. They don't give a damn about the collective cost of their policies. As long as a person can earn money in a specific, specific position, we don't care how much the rest costs. The problem is that today, for every euro that they earn, we're paying maybe €100, maybe €1,000 collectively. That's the problem. Okay, I'll leave you my friends and I'll be back when I get back. You know, I could come back later or I could come back in a month. I don't know. This is my last day. I have a lot to say. I have a lot to say. That's good, that's good. That's good. For a blogger, it's good to have things to say. See you soon, my friends. Mister.