le dégoût 2/2

I'm re watching the video, my friends. I don't know if the previous one was recorded at all or not. I hope it was. But you can see the whole camp, even in the camera. Fed up with all this. Uh, I was telling you to continue the conversation, that if you look at the migrants who end up in France or the United Kingdom, if you ask them if they're okay, they'll tell you, I would be here. If it had been okay, I would be here. I would have come to England, I would have come to France. Do you see what I mean? Do you understand the thing? It's that today, even those who come here, even people who come from abroad, from difficult countries, they only come when they have no choice. They only come when they don't have enough to eat, even in their own country. Do you understand? Those who have a choice, those who want to do controlled immigration, selective immigration. It's that selective immigration goes both ways, as I think Sarkozy said. It was Sarkozy who talked about selective immigration in France. When you say selective immigration, it means that we are France, we attract the best, and what we are going to do is choose the cream of the crop, the best of the best. Today you don't attract many people anymore. You don't attract anything at all. So if the guy comes to you, you know that he comes because he is desperate. You know that if the guy had the choice, if the guy had spoken languages, had a fortune, had degrees that had opened up 50 countries for him, for example, it's clear that he wouldn't be here, he wouldn't be with you in France, he wouldn't be with us in England. I mean, he wouldn't last. He wouldn't even consider us. He wouldn't even keep us in his top 10 list. What do you want? So somewhere in relation to my motivation in general, I'm asking myself, what am I defending? What am I defending? What am I talking about? What am I doing? I see this world, and the more I see it, the more it listens to me deeply and it's sincere. It's really the feeling of disgust that I have. And it's a very, very dangerous feeling because it pushes me to not give a damn and say, yes, but anyway. And then. And then, okay, now I'm starting to be a bit like that. Every problem I tell myself, anyway, where we are, huh? Where we are. It's a bit like if the Titanic is sinking and then someone takes a key and starts scratching furniture or something. You want to say, listen, if it makes you happy. You're up to your knees in water. You enjoy breaking furniture. Go ahead, do it anyway. You and the furniture will be 4,000 meters underwater in 45 minutes. You see, that's kind of what it is, okay? That's kind of the mentality that I have today. Uh, I hope to bounce back. I hope to bounce back to something else. But I don't really want to talk about politics anymore because I don't think, I don't really believe anymore that politics will change significantly. The French have been, how should I say? In our country, we say the sheep's face is known. In fact, when we talk about the face of the sheep or the lamb, in this case, there is something particular. There is a perverse, toxic relationship between the average voter and the politicians that exist in France. It means that for decades, voters have been accustomed to the sheep somewhere. They have been accustomed to the liar, the falsifier. They have been accustomed to people who make false promises and then go back on them. They have been accustomed to the pervert, the narcissist. They have been accustomed to this kind of people, this kind of person. So there is a typical psychological profile for which the French vote, and there is a psychological profile for which the French don't, would never vote. The psychological profile for which the French would never vote is the person of integrity, the honest person, the person who promises, who makes serious promises, who promises and delivers. This person is responsible, this person who has values. When this person speaks, the average voter does not recognize himself in it, okay? Because in the political circus, it has become a circus. In the political circus, such a person cannot be identified by the French as someone who could be a politician, because it is a question of credibility, after all, it is a question of credibility. Credibility. For example, if someone comes to tell you, I don't know, he knocks on your door, he says, listen, I'm going to show you how to become rich. I'm going to show you, sell you a method to become rich. So if the guy comes with a. He keeps a sports car downstairs from your house. He parks, I don't know, me, a car worth half a million euros. Then he has a watch worth €100,000 and all that. Then he wants to explain to you how to become rich. Even if he's a crook, you're going to listen to him because he's credible in a way. So if the guy, I don't know, he arrives in a worn out jacket, he arrives by bus, he knows if he leaves on the bus was late and all that I'm going to run to catch the next one and all that. It's clear that if he wants to talk to you about how to become rich, you're not going to listen to him. So there's a sort of vicious circle. The vicious circle is the following, is that the French, by the way, were no better here in the United Kingdom. You know, the French are used to being controlled and directed by a corrupt political party. Corrupt. And not that. I'm not talking about illegal taking of interests and things like that, I'm talking about corrupt. But corrupt to the core of their souls. There's nothing worthwhile in that, in these people. They are corrupt, okay? With a capital C. Here's the problem. Because when someone spends half a year, they have in their head, they have in their mind the typical example or the typical image of the politician. So when they see people of this kind arriving as candidates, they recognize them, they are there and presidential. When we say that he is president, it means that he is vermin. So at that point, they vote for him. They say, well, that one, yes. If there is someone opposite him who does not present his features, or who is perhaps less present, this person will be automatically rejected.

Okay.

A bit like the idea I have of French politics today. Uh, more to add, even if this scenario that I just mentioned has not really presented itself to the French, but if, for example, tomorrow Macron had to rerun his seat, it is clear that he would vote for him. Huh? That's it. We must not kid ourselves. So people who say, yes, but there was fraud, it makes me laugh a little bit. These are people who still have faith in their fellow citizens when they say, why? Because when they say there was fraud, it's a form of denial. They wouldn't have voted in their conscience for this person and the disastrous project they are promoting. Not after everything we've been through, not after all the scandals, not after the €135 to move away from home, not after the electronics, not after the flash balls in the eyes. After all that they would never have voted against that. Well, no, if you want to get closer to reality, tell yourself that that's why they're voting. Yeah, that's why they're voting.

Okay.

They would vote for even worse than that. And what's terrible today, it's absolutely terrible because we've pointed out. We've pointed out the leadership's destruction. We've told them that we're ready, we're ready for enslavement. It's over. Because the Dangers. If I come back at the beginning of the video, I said that I had mentioned the dangers that I had listed. They were obvious dangers, but there were less obvious dangers that were lurking a little behind. We are paying for these dangers today, and we are really only at the beginning of this path. These are dangers linked to people who are becoming ignorant, to increasing venality, to selfishness, to people connected to television, to citizen disengagement. All of these kinds of dangers today, once we collect them all and we connect them together, we end up with a society that is ready for dictatorship, that is completely ready, that is ripe for its slavery. That is a bit of the problem we have.

Okay?

So for me, this problem suddenly takes precedence over the others. If I compare them to the others, that is why I want it. Today. There are people who. Who are always focused on. Yes, there is a halal canteen and all that. I mean, you, you. It's over. All that's over. I would like to go back, honestly, I would like to go back to the time when the halal canteen was our main concern, when our first duty was to manage the halal canteen and do something about it. That's over. That's over.

Okay?

We are in another dimension of danger today. It's above that. Far above. Well, everyone has their own battles. Everyone has their own struggles. In any case, this is no longer mine. In any case, it's very difficult to be surrounded by people who are blind and often driven not by rationality, but by pure emotion. Well, I can't blame a human for having feelings. That. That's not it. But today I assure you that if we are not more reptilian than the reptilians, we won't get very far. We won't be able to fight them. You know, we can't fight feelings against them. They don't have feelings.

Okay?

So if we are carried away by our feelings, that's it. Anyway, thank you, my friends, and I'll come back another time. See you soon.