Le Narcissisme de la Conversion & Images Bibliques

Good evening, my friends. Yesterday, some people said to me, why don't you come and debate with us on YouTube? So let me tell you something, my friends. I'm not here to debate with you because I think you're totally right. You understand? So I'm not someone who's here to try to change your mind. I just hope that whatever life you have, even if your opinion is extremely different from mine, I hope you live it well. I hope it's consistent with your values, with your worldview. And honestly, if you achieve that, I'm happy for you. But I'm not here to convince you and even less to convert you or anything like that. By the way, speaking of conversion, I have something to tell you about conversion. Don't you think it's narcissistic to want to convert people like I convert you? Huh? I convert you. I make you enter into what I am, whatever I am, but I make you enter into it. Once you are in there, then I love you, then I serve you, then you are my brother. Because why? Because in fact, you have become like me. Yes, you see, the narcissistic side of things, it is a narcissistic side because you must not love people by transforming them like you. You must love people. That is the real challenge. That is the real challenge. That is the real commandment. It is to value people as they are, not to tell them, okay, God, I am ready to love people. Huh? I am ready to love people, but on condition that I make them like me. So if they become like me, I love them. That's a little bit like psychiatry. Also, conversion is a form of murder. Converting someone is like, well, I realize. I realize you're no longer who you are. There you go. And now I'll let you live. I'm glad you're alive. So, taken to the extreme, it gives us what we know. We're not going to rehash current events or history, but when this logic is taken to the extreme, we can clearly see what it gives us. So there you go. I prefer to believe that in terms of religion or philosophy or vision or whatever, I prefer to believe that the same light can be expressed in different colors and that each person, according to their inclinations, according to their dispositions, will favor one color. In fact, it's just a light that is part of a whole, and it has the merit of carrying this light. And that's it. That's all. Ah, today I came to talk to you about other things. So, a little story. Let's imagine. Let's imagine A little. For this story, let's imagine that you are preparing a cake, right? You are in the kitchen, you are taking out your ingredients, you want to arrange them. And then for the story, let's imagine that you have parental authority over two children. I insist you have parental authority. I like to say. I don't like to say you have two children because in fact, it is not the property of the children. You understand? There is a problem. No human language is sometimes a little weak in conveying real concepts. Uh, your children aren't yours. I mean, since when are they yours? No one. I mean, your parental authority over them, right? And there you have it. So this is another video. No, we're not going to talk about it now. But in fact, you have two children. So let's say you have a boy who's 10, you have a girl who's 9, 8. Anyway, that's pretty much it. You get the picture. So you prepare all this, your recipe, and then at some point, you turn your back, you arrive, you find that the chocolate has disappeared. The chocolate that you prepared in nice little cubes to melt and use in your cake, it's disappeared. So of course, you don't need to have wine or anything else to know who ate it. It's a classic. We've all been there. And so what happens is you're going to call the kids and they're in front of the tv. You're going to call them, you're going to say, listen, I want an explanation. Who touched that? They have chocolate on them and all that. But you expect them to admit it? To admit it? Well, no. So the boy. Well, no, it wasn't me. I didn't. Well, I don't know. It was her, actually. That's easy. She's the one who told me to touch that. You tell her. Well, you say her. And what do you have to say? Oh, well, you're the cat. It's the cat. Well, there's the cat over there. It's the cat who told me to touch all the chocolate because otherwise I would never, ah, I would never have touched that quote. So it's clear that as someone exercising parental authority, it's a little. You're a little bit. How can I put it? You're a little bit upset by the position of these kids. More reasonable, we can talk about it. What would be the reasons, for example, they took your chocolate. Your chocolate is important to you. It's a purely material problem. You can see it like that. Another way of looking at it is that you forbade Anyone from touching the ingredients in your recipe, they touched it, you're freaked out. You can't get it into their heads when you did that. Thirdly, everyone will choose according to their own opinions, right? There are already some who have chosen based on these two propositions. There's a third one. You're still worried that kids of this age who normally grew up with you, you must have tried to communicate a certain sense of meaning to them and all that. You still find it strange that they can't admit it. I mean, it's obvious that they ate the chocolate. It's obvious that they were tempted by it, the chocolate. It doesn't matter. You have plenty in the closet. But at least you expected them to be honest and say, well, we're sorry, we did it. Well, sorry, you know, in that case, you would have said, okay, go back where you were, and that's it. But in fact, now you get angry and say, well, I'm going to take the TV away from you and then we're going to do some homework. I'm going to send you to do your homework. Then do your homework. Okay? You're going to work on it, right? You take the thing you hate the most. Maybe that'll teach you a little bit to take responsibility. And then we'll see you in two hours and talk about it again and see if you had the same explanation about chocolate. Maybe this time you'll be a little more honest. Quote, third place. In fact, this story that I'm telling you is a sort of biblical allegory. Because if you look at God, he had authority over only two humans at the time. And this version is found among Jews, Christians, Muslims and others of other religions. So he had these two humans, a man and a woman. He put them in paradise. They were having fun, messing around and all that. Then at one point he just made them do something forbidden. A pretty basic thing that he imposed in exchange for all that. And what happened? What happened? They broke this prohibition. So there's a tree with apples. He eats an apple, apparently. So that's it. First question. Well, God gets angry. He brings them back. Well, Adam says it wasn't me. Well, it was her who told me. I would never have done it all on my own. She says, it wasn't me, it was the serpent, he's the one who told me, etc. So he starts playing a bit of a pathetic game, a pathetic one in front of God. So the question we can ask ourselves is, did God get angry? Because if we're in a materialistic view. Did he get angry because we took an apple? I mean, what's the reason for all this, this whole universe thing, humans on earth, all this killing, all this suffering, all this. It's because he was missing a door. I mean, because he didn't know how to replace that door. It's not possible, you understand? It's ridiculous. It's nothing. Because he freaked out when he got angry. He got so angry that when we transgressed his order. So he did all that for that? Ah, I mean, I say that with great respect. I'm not trying to provoke or anything, honestly. I'm not using the word provocative or anything like that. It's sincere and if I'm wrong, please correct me. I have the impression that many Muslims have this vision of God, this vision of an angry God who does nothing, who does nothing, who did all that for an apple, which is extremely. Or for a transgression, let's say very weak and ultimately very basic compared to what we do today in this post 911 world. I was going to say what's happening is that if God couldn't pass over an apple, he couldn't forgive for an apple. Will he forgive for the killings? Will he forgive for the abominable transgressions that we commit and which are of a much greater dimension than just a tree? Right, okay, that's not possible. So in fact we are probably here with this vision, this religious vision. We are probably here because our ancestors were not up to the task. They were not able to be there. They were not able to take responsibility and face up to it and be honest. Also, if you look, if you look, since I'm talking to you about Adam and Eve, notice something, an absolutely extraordinary detail. And here it will still tickle Muslims. But I say tickle, not even provoke. Just make them think in the sense of make them think. If you notice, Adam and Eve were in a paradise. It's a divine paradise. They weren't on earth, they weren't in the 93, they weren't in a rotten neighborhood. It wasn't. They weren't. It's in an absolutely select high end place. It's how many, and in fact they arranged how many prohibitions, how many things that were forbidden. It's not like today, today you take the religious codes and if you take the civil codes, the criminal codes and things like that, you can fill this car with prohibitions, huh? And we're all outlaws without knowing it. We're outlaws. I mean if you catch me there like that by chance, you stop Me? You can give me 10 years. That's it. And you too, I think we're all like that. And what's happening is that they were in a simple, perfect, square world, and they transgress. They transgress. So why am I talking to Muslims? Because there are some who are trying to change their world. There are those who want to change the world. And that means everything that is forbidden. Well, everything that is religiously forbidden. Hiding it, banishing it, destroying it, killing it. In fact, trying to create a world where there is no transgression. And in reality, it creates a world where there is life. It creates a world where there are frustrations that generate even more, much more horrible things. While in all religions there is clearly this allegory that shows you that even if there were only two humans in a divine paradise with only one prohibition, they would interest you. So what that means is that change can only come from within. That means if you want to respect the law with a great such, that force can only come from within, it can in no way come by changing your world with a hammer. Because even in a perfect world, there will be a transgression. And then there's another story a little further on. When there was Abel and Ca Bon. I mean, they started shooting each other. There was. There was. There was Abel who got cold feet and all that. How many were there at that time? I don't know. I would have a hard time telling you, but maybe 12, 50. No more than that, huh? According to the story, according to the allegory, all that's allegorical, huh? I don't think we should take things literally, huh? Like, there was a census, it was 25 and all that. No, I think they're more like images. But they have a power, a truth, a depth that has meant that they've survived the ages and they've also survived civilizations, cultures and all that. Many civilizations, cultures have died, been born, all that. These stories continue to pass through. And in fact, they are shot. Huh? So here we go. There are two of them, huh? They are. They are two. They eat an apple, huh? We are already in. We are okay. We are a little damage. Okay, Just an apple after all, huh? Let's calm down. Uh, sometime later, they have the Earth. You see the surface. We calculated that today, a huge Earth. And all that, these continents and the guys, they shoot each other, they kill each other. They already commit something more horrible than that. It means that these people who say, there are too many of us, we are on top of each other. That's why we kill. That's why we do evil. That's why they are right, in a way. But somewhere, in view of these allegories, it doesn't hold water. Because we had murders, we had killings. Even at that time it was 25. So. Well, if you don't believe that time, just go back 2,000, 3,000 years. I don't know how many there were. What, 1 million, 2 million, 3 million? I don't know, not many. My, he didn't have Sita, but not the barakam. But there wasn't all that he was shooting himself. It was literature. It's full of that, you know? Anyway, it was just a little round of exchange, okay? We have a duty to exchange. Because what we exchange are things that have a common value for us. It's a common value. I tell you things, you tell me others, and we exchange. I'm not here to debate, honestly, I'm just here to chat because I feel like it's a duty. See you next time, folks. And thank you for being here. And thank you to everyone who said hello to the cat, the dogs and the goldfish. See you soon.