Le Petit Remplacement

Hello, my friends. So I'm back after a few days of vacation. I rented an apartment by the sea, a two to three hour drive from here. When I rented it, the temperature was 30 to 35 degrees Celsius in amber. When I arrived, it was raining every day, the temperature was 16 degrees Celsius, and I could look out at the sea through the window while sitting by the heater. There you have it. So I'd like to talk to you about this and that. So today I'd like to start with this story about the Swiss police who say that Algeria doesn't want to take back its criminals. Algeria doesn't want to take back its criminals. So I'll tell you something. Uh, the rule in the kind of world we live in is that each country takes care of its borders, and security issues in one country are not the responsibility of another. We Algerians don't say, yes, the Swiss, you know, we have people coming back from the southern border and everything, and the Swiss don't care. Okay, we don't say that. Okay, The Swiss aren't their problem. There's something very important today which is that many of these people who arrive without papers are encouraged by associations or even encouraged by political parties, are encouraged by voters who support these political parties. Ah, Many of these people come without papers very often, destroy their papers on the way, or don't even take them with them. So you only have their word that they are Algerian. Okay, that's the first point. Unlike Switzerland, Algeria requires proper papers to enter and cross the border. Do you see the thing? Let me tell you a story. I once met a guy on a plane who was Algerian and living in France. And he explained to me that before his regularization, he had lived for many years without papers in Europe. One day he was arrested in France. He was working. He was arrested and then they started deportation proceedings. They arrested him, wanted to deport him. He said what? He said, I'm Moroccan. Then they asked for his first and last name, he place of birth. Well, he gave a fanciful identity and located him in Morocco. They put him in a van and took him to the Moroccan embassy, which was very lenient at the time. Morocco issued him a document that exactly reproduced what the police actually gave them. So what happened? They put him on a plane and deported him to Morocco. Once he arrives in Morocco, the guys at the Moroccan borders are perhaps a little sharper than the ones at the embassy. They ask the guy three questions and tell him, no, I'm not Moroccan. This information doesn't match anything Anyway, he checks it on the computer. I told the French that I was Algerian, but the French are Algerian. So what do the Moroccans do for them? It's a national who shows up at the border. He doesn't have the right papers to return to Morocco. Uh, the airline didn't even bring him back. What do they do? They put him on the next plane. Okay, they put him on the next plane. And what do the French do? So he arrives in France. What do the French do? He tells them, well, no, I'm Algerian. After all, we misunderstood each other and all that. They cross it out. They take the document issued by the Moroccan authorities. They. They erase Morocco and write Algeria. And they put it on a plane to Algeria. It arrives in Algeria. Algeria does not accept it because it is a document that does not mean anything. A document issued by the Moroccan authorities. It is another state, it is a country. Morocco is the same thing. It is like Belgium, Switzerland, completely different countries. And in fact, it ends up back in France after the French have expelled it twice. What do they do? Well, they release it, right? And then they end up regularizing it one day. In fact, the thing today, what is the equation? The equation is that if someone sets foot in your country, if someone crosses your border and sets foot in your country, they are yours. There you have it. The rule is very simple. That's the game. They are yours. That's why the Associations, Soros and all that are sending thousands and thousands of migrants to U, which is a demographic surplus. In reality, he was neither a God nor anything at all, but there is just an explosive demographic in the south. So they need mouths to feed. They have mouths to feed that they need to export to the West. And these mouths to feed will very often turn into Western Union money or. Okay. And it also, incidentally, allows local regimes to ease the pressure a little. Because when you have a family of 12, if they manage to send one guy to Spain and another to Switzerland, who starts sending Westerns, this family of 12 will be able to live, and then they will cause fewer problems. You see the thing? So it's a win win for everyone, right? Okay, What I'm saying is very cynical, but the world is cynical. The world has become an extremely, extremely cynical place. So frankly, by the way, I am extremely. I see that the Swiss have lowered. Anyway, when I was a student, I hung out with people from the University of Lausanne, the Ecole Polytechnique de Lausanne and other schools. And I remember there were Russians, Colombians, Moroccans, Algerians, Senegalese people, everyone. I remember that towards the end of their studies, many of them tried to find a way to stay in Switzerland. Because after a few years they got used to it, they felt good, they had degrees, all that. They really started to want to stay. No, I don't remember a single one who stayed. So that's why I think the Swiss have declined. Because I see that today they're struggling. Whereas when I lived in Switzerland, they were extremely, ah, extremely, how should I say, efficient. I myself had sent me a letter. They asked me to leave by paying 30 francs. H. I liked 30 francs. So I replied, I said, uh, here we are, we are in a market, a liberal market, huh? I'm not the African who's going to explain it to you. I pay 30 francs to stay, okay? As a customer. I pay 30 francs for the right to stay. I don't pay 30 francs for the right to leave. You have to pay 30 francs. Well, I look, observe. I left without ever paying 30 francs. You know, finally, to tell you about people smugglers and all that, there's a bank, C artist, not to mention a British one, who financed a ship. Who financed a ship, right? So some will say, yes, they finance the great replacement. There's no great replacement. It's a complete lie. The great replacement doesn't exist. The day I see it, there will be a small replacement, not a big one. Why? Because the day I see migrants arriving by sea, the day I see them on the boards of directors of CAC 40 companies, okay? Or at the head of big banks or. Or at the head of big companies, or at the head of big financial companies with six or seven figure salaries and stock options and so on. There, yes, there. I would say there is a great replacement for the moment. There is a small replacement for the moment. What is it for the moment, for the moment, it is the most vulnerable people in society who feel replaced. That means the guy, the guy, he could be French, by the way, or he could be a foreigner, right? The guy, like, he's there, he's In France, a 10 year residence permit or something like that, that he's struggling at, you know, we're going to have a complete uberization of society. He works for less than the minimum wage for a quarter of the minimum wage and then he can't even, you can imagine that he can't make ends meet with that. And then there are people who are going to replace him who are ready to work for an eighth of the minimum wage, okay? That's the thing, huh? There are lots of people, for example, who make Money by renting, huh? You have the guy who is in good standing. He could be French or someone else in good standing. He's going to get an Uber license or something similar. I'm telling you this by Uber, but what's he going to do? He's not going to work, but he's going to rent. He's going to rent the car and the papers and everything. A migrant who's going to work for next to nothing, and he's going to take the cash. Okay, we can understand that these people are in favor of immigration. Do you understand? That's why the, the left wing caviar is pro immigration, of course, because they live in poor neighborhoods, but their children go to expensive private hospitals and they get treatment in clinics where when they arrive, the head of the clinic comes out into the parking lot, opens the door for them and accompanies them inside, asks them how the dog is doing, right? That's how these people live. Okay? So when you talk to these people about the big replacement, they tell you there's no big replacement. You're dreaming. I mean, they don't live that reality, you see? So tomorrow we could bring 50 million migrants back to Europe. What would that change for them? It wouldn't change anything. Okay, strictly speaking, the woman who, as your minister of justice said, is probably going to change, the cleaning lady, the cleaning lady was, maybe she was malian, with a 10 year residence permit, years old, who was earning maybe €5 an hour, huh? She will be replaced by a Nigerian one, for example, who will earn euro $1.50. That's all. And who will be placed there by an intermediary who takes a cut. I mean, that's how it is. That's how it is. In any case, the Bonney, the ship, there's already one death today. Okay? There's already one death. But you know, we say in Algeria, uh, the thief, whatever the price he sells it for, he wins. Do you understand? When you make a product, when you make, I don't know, a tv, you make a TV and it costs you, I don't know, it costs you, for example, €200. You have a cost price of €250, huh? You have to sell it for a higher price to make money, huh? You have to sell it for a higher price. But the thief didn't take any. Come back. His cost price is zero, right? We're not going to count the tools and the gas to get there. But hey, he breaks, he breaks an apartment, he puts the stuff, he puts the stuff in a Van and he leaves after the TV. Even if you bought it for €600, you're still paying for it. He can sell it for €50. It's not a problem, right? I know someone in my family. Their cell phone was stolen, a very expensive cell phone. They caught him in circumstances. I can tell you about them. Actually, they stole a phone from someone in my family. It was in a town hall. She was waiting for her turn, and then after a while, she discovered that her pockets had been picked and that the phone had disappeared. And in fact, someone else, her husband, in fact, went to a guy, the first I know, who was a former colleague of mine, who at one time, let's say, I'm searching for my words here, you see, it's this guy, let's say he had retired from the scene, let's put it that way. He wasn't really involved in local crime anymore, but he knew what was going on. And then he told him, look, my phone was stolen at the town hall. They said, listen, I'll check it out again. And since pickpockets and all that don't work by chance anyway, you know, there are territories, all that. So he knew. He knew under what authority the town hall fell. Anyway, a few hours later, they put the guy who took the phone in a place, and then they called this member of my family and said, listen, we're sorry, but the phone was stolen. The guy is an alcoholic. He stole it and then he sold it for next to nothing. Practically, in half an hour, he was already gone. But they offer you two things. They make you two offers. First thing, either he steals another one from you. He steals a phone of the same model, if you want, or the other option, if you want. We put him in a car, we take him to a vacant lot, and we beat him up. And then you can come and beat him up too. There you go. So both options have been declined, of course. But just to tell you that, well, the thief, whatever the price, he goes for, he. He wins. So today we have to see who pays. We have to see who wins. To put it in a more complicated way, I work in companies here in the uk, for example, where you have, for example, someone who works in sales, he will. To sign a contract with a client, he will offer them. He will put so many things in the contract, because the client does not really want to sign. He wants to force this sale, he wants to push it. He wants to. In reality, when you look at everything he offered in the contract, he is selling at a loss. But he is not the one selling the loss. The company is selling the loss. Because, for example, he will earn a million for the company today and the company will lose 5 million over the next three years. But he doesn't care because it's not the same pocket that loses. It's not the same pocket that wins. He needed a million to cover his annual expenses and receive his bonus and be invited to the CEO's office. And there you have it. The contract is signed after the company loses 3, 4, 10 or 15 million over the coming years. He doesn't care because he won't be there in the years to come. And anyway, it's not that he is dishonest. You should always remember that there is no dishonest person in a company or an organization. When there is someone dishonest in an organization, the entire organization is dishonest. When someone perpetuates it. When you work in a place and you see people perpetuating borderline behavior or behavior that goes beyond honesty, it is the company that is corrupted to the core. Why? Because his manager knows it. But his manager needs it, like his director. And he needs to close the year too. So he knows that these guys are using methods that are not very legitimate. Okay? But he turns a blind eye because he also needs to close the year. Then you go all the way up to the CEO. The CEO also has an edge. He has shareholders. He desperately needs to show that this year we did better than last year. After that, he doesn't care. Because if in five years things are going to go to hell. He doesn't care. He won't be here in five years. He won't be here. He will have already cashed in his stock options. He will have already paid for his second home. He will have already paid for his private jet. He doesn't care. Okay? What I'm talking about here is a bit like the west, okay? That's a bit like it. It's dishonesty, corruption at all levels with people who don't care. So when I tell you that we're going to look for a migrant, going to look for boats of migrants, these migrants are going to cost the community a lot of money. Because a very large number of them will never integrate. A very large number of them will be a burden on the community for generations. We see it in France, a very good illustration, in Sweden too, elsewhere here in the uk. But it's not the same pockets that win. It's not the same pockets that lose. You know, if we have to bring in 1000 migrants and 990 migrants are the responsibility of the community. But there are 10 who work in uberized conditions and who are cutting prices, who are cutting wages by €3 per hour. There you go. There you go. That's good. It's one. We don't care that the other 990 will cost €100 million over their lifetime. We don't care if this company can earn €100,000 per year. Do you understand what I mean? That's it. The situation is that where we are today is that I'm ready. So I don't have €2 here. I don't have. Here, I have 20 cents. Look, look, that's it. I have 20 cents. Do you understand there? It's 20 cents. OK, 20 cents. So you have guys, they are ready to make you lose €50,000 if they can earn 20 cents, right? Okay, that's it. So that's why when we compare, when we look at the big picture, if we zoom out, it's good. I like to look at the big picture. But sometimes, sometimes, sometimes we can lose. We can. This is an article from 1996. It's very interesting. He explains how, how organizations that have grown, companies that operate in a capitalist market, a free market in the United States, fund millions each year to literally Marxist organizations, to organizations that are in favor of racial policies, that are in favor of more government, that are in favor of interventionism, that are in favor of more taxes, more regulation, more, more. That's it. And he doesn't understand, he says he doesn't understand how organizations that operate in that market can pay their own enemies. Okay? McCarty was right. In fact, McCarty, for those who know about markartism, he was completely right. He was, he was, he was, he was. Of course, because since he lost the McCarty battle, you know, okay, he lost the battle. Ultimately, when we teach McCarty, we teach under a negative number, under a negative angle, simply because he lost. So he's not the one who writes history. History is written by the winners, remember? So McCarty lost. So there you have it. But he was absolutely right, McCarty. And in fact what happens is that companies, these companies, uh, pay for their virginity, pay for their conscience by ostentatiously giving money to an association that deals in gender, that deals in race, that deals in migrants. It's just a way of trying to morally, isn't it, show themselves to be superior when in reality, you take for example companies, agri, food companies, they do work, they make children work, they make, they make people work in abominable conditions, by the way, when they often make people work, why do they outsource? Never think about it. Because that's the scam. Offshoring isn't necessarily just about salaries, right? When you think of offshoring, you think of salaries. That's not true. That's not true. That's not true, my friends. Offshoring is also about avoiding regulations, avoiding labor regulations, right? For example, if you're in Europe, you have to have the guy and you have to insure him. You have to pay for his unemployment insurance, medical insurance, you have to give him vacations, you have to make him work in conditions that won't destroy his health, at least not in the short term. Whereas if you go somewhere else, you could pollute. You could throw your garbage, your chemicals directly into the river. You pull a pipe, you throw your filth, your toxic gases and everything, your toxic waste directly into the air. Uh, you put the leftovers in a truck, it travels 3km, finds a vacant lot, dumps everything. There you go. You can make children work, uh, you can make people work, uh, maybe picking bananas or something. And then you spray them with chemicals directly in the face and so on. It's not a problem. Okay? That's it, huh? That's the kind of, that's the kind of crap they actually do. Uh, textile companies, uh, make children work, make people work in factories where they're locked up. They're not allowed to go out, by the way. There's a factory, once it burned down, there were deaths and all that because even the emergency services were closed. They're not allowed to go to the toilet. They're, uh, I mean, it's modern slavery. Then he gives €100,000 tax free to a pro migrant association. And then like that, he shows that he is superior to constantation. Here, €100,000. There you go. And in fact, it also allows him to obtain slaves locally. Okay. People who are going to consume. Consume how, how are migrants going to consume? Well, consume with your money. I mean, you have to think about it, because the guy arrives right here. They arrive and start showering them with money. What do they do? They are going to consume straight away because they have been attracted by the consumerist dream. That's the thing. Well, I mean, uh, that's it. You know, I'm starting to tip over to the bad side of the force, to the dark side of the force. I won't hide it from you. Uh, I'm completely. As time goes on, I'm starting to see the west as completely dark in Fact, I'm starting to become a little bit extremely negative about the West. I won't hide it from you. This is. And the latest thing that is happening today with the tyranny that is coming upon us, the health tyranny, we are literally having coups d', etat. Coups d' etat that Dr. Josef Mengele could have carried out and which are extremely worrying. And there are people who are discovering new facets of their states today in the west, new facets of their establishment. Now it's just us here who are discovering new facets, but the facet is not new. The facet. If you ask the Syrians, the Iraqis, the Afghans, the Yemenis, uh, you ask in Africa, you ask in many places, there are many people who know what Western regimes and the media behind them are worth. There are many people who have been bombed. There are many people who have been driven from their homes. There are many people who have been killed. There are many peoples against whom mercenaries or armed terrorist groups financed by the west have been sent to the applause of the Western media. So the Western media, the Western regimes and their state media, there are many people who have no illusions about these people. In the west alone, we still have some illusions, but many people, because they have already paid the price, okay, but I have the impression that we in the west are going to pay the price. This means that what is going to change? What is really going to change? I think that the situation that is really going to change in 2020, I think I will stop there, without going into too much detail, is that all the dirty tricks that Western regimes were doing elsewhere today they want to do at home. That is what is original. Because the mechanism is always the same. These people have been doing crappy things elsewhere for 20, 30, 40, 50 years, for years, inventing, inventing really outlandish things. The media launches a fierce campaign against the country in question. Remember not long ago, the fierce campaign, nothing against Russia, for example. They launch a fierce campaign and then they bomb the country, destroy it, kill millions of people, and all that between those who die of famine, those who die on the roads, those who die under bombs, those who die at the hands of mercenaries or terrorists. And then the media, okay, applauding Today we risk seeing similar scenarios repeated here, okay, in Europe now, Because these same regimes say, but why do we do this crap elsewhere? Why don't we do it in front of our own country? That's it. Anyway, friends, I'll leave you without going into detail about this point. I'll go into more detail at some point. I'll come back another time. That's it. See you soon, mister.