Le plan Macron : Il part ou il déclenche la guerre ?

Hello, my friends. Many of you have written to me to ask me what Macron is going to do next. What do you think is next? Well, listen, this man has more than one trick up his sleeve, as they say. Since I don't have a crystal ball myself, I can't tell you for sure what he's going to do, but I can tell you roughly what's taking shape. So I follow him on Twitter, I take a look at what he likes. He likes things regularly. And by the way, I noticed that he uses GPT Chat often. His tweets are generated by GPT Chat, which is a very bad habit for a head of state. Why? Because he holds an extremely sensitive position. If he's asking ChatGPT questions about the direction of the country. Ah, to write things about Russia or Ukraine or Germany or. Or whatever, that's something that makes me extremely nervous, because for what he's paid, we really expect that the decisions come from him as much as possible. And also, there's one thing. The eyes today are American ones. Well, Europe is the continent that has the most regulations on artificial intelligence, but it's not a continent that has credible artificial intelligence. So he's using American ones. So most certainly the Americans know that it's his account. You can imagine that their intelligence service is not asleep. They know which important figures in the world are the decision makers who use American ones. And of course, they can quite easily slip them suggestions. So that makes me extremely nervous about the, let's say, sovereign side of the decisions that are made by Macron. Now, let's get back to its history. There was an escalation. There was more and more talk of a world war, a global war. Allow me, as an African, to be brutal, wouldn't I? But you go to many places in Africa and don't consider the Second World War to be a world war. Just because Westerners were fighting doesn't mean the world was fighting. There were plenty of places that watched it on television, or rather listened to it on the radio. Television wasn't something that was very popular at the time. So what I'm trying to say is that there are people who say that he could end up starting a world war, if you like, with Russia, because what we're seeing right now is that Europe is preparing for war, while in the United States, with Trump, he's trying to achieve peace because, well, you know, guys, it's coming, but it's also ending. And so what Trump is trying to do is bring everyone together around a table and try to reach an Agreement. Well, an agreement where people have to make concessions, people aren't completely 100% happy, but hey, wars generally always have a big loser, which is the civilian population. That's clear, right? I mean, it's almost. It's. If you look at, I don't know, the Second World War, it's almost. You want to say, well, if there's a war, I'll join the army, huh? Because I'm less likely to die than if I commit suicide. Pretty crazy. But the statistics are formal. So I see that the leading locomotive is France, the United Kingdom, and Germany, who absolutely want a war. And I can tell you something. I think that even if tomorrow Zelensky and Putin meet and shake hands and finally say to each other, we got into a fight, it wasn't worth all that. Let's sign peace agreements and restore our relations, which is what happened in the past after many wars. Look at Germany, France. And then, well, you arrive after the World War, you already have the Franco German couple. So tomorrow you. You can see the Russian Ukrainian couple. So let's imagine that happens. I think that despite everything, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom will want to go to the station. That's the story of Ukraine. It's just a pretext, because you have to know that this country is not part of the European Union. It's not part of NATO. So really, it is being used as an instrument, just as we used Afghanistan or South Vietnam or Iraq or other countries that have been used for much bigger plans than that. So it could start a war, and then I'll say it could. I'm not saying that's what it's going to do, but potentially it could. In the coming months, such a decision would have to be made. Why? Because at the rate at which the Ukrainian army is losing its soldiers, there will come a time when it won't have any more. So once they've sent the women and the old people and all that, a decision will have to be made. What does a decision mean? It means either to stop this war because there is no one left who is ready to fight, right? There is nothing left. We no longer have anyone to hand. It means we have gone. We have pushed support for the Ukrainian war because we do not support Ukraine. We support the war in Ukraine, which is different. It means that we are pushing these people to go and feed themselves in a war that they will never be able to win. So we give them weapons, we tell them, go to the front. We will watch and count the dead. And then when. Well, we will. When There are too many dead. Well, we go out in a heartbeat. We ask chatgpt write me an in two is against Russia and so on, you see. So there's a lot of cynicism here. And the fact is that there will come a time when these three countries, this trio I'm talking about, will have to make a decision. Either they give up, which means we're stopping all this, or they'll have to send troops on the ground, or they'll have to send the French, the Germans, the British, well, the British, I mean, they're so russophobic that they wanna fight it out. There's no place on this planet for a country called Russia and another called the United Kingdom. There's only one that can exist, so. Well, we'll see how it goes. For the United Kingdom, a war against Russia will make it possible to achieve climate goals, I think, quite quickly. Potentially we could have it in a microsecond, right? We can have climate targets that are fully achieved for probably 10,000 years, so why not? It's interesting when you look at it from this angle. The Germans, well, they had a revenge Stalingrad, a certain number of battles like that stuck in their craw. So maybe they want to try again. It's possible. Ah, France. They elected and elected twice. I mean, it wasn't an accident, right? The first time, well, we didn't know all that, but hey, the second time it's still, yes, it's still we resign for nemga. So France also wants to go into this system to probably hide a bankruptcy. There is France heading towards bankruptcy, the United Kingdom also heading towards bankruptcy. So this has to be hidden by a war of natural disaster. Now, would this potentially allow Macron to stay in power? Why not? Why not? Why not? Because let's imagine a war breaks out in 2026, then the elections are approaching and we're going to say, let's listen. We need republican continuity, we need institutional stability. The one who best embodies that is Macron. And, well, one day or another he'll leave power, but in the meantime, well, he's the one who's the leader. That's a possibility, by the way, Zensky, that's what he did. Now, I'm not a big fan of that theory. It's a theory. We'll see what happens. It's like we don't know. I'm not a big fan. Why? Because in the Western world, it's not Egypt either, you know, it's not like he's going to pull a fast one on Us, he's not going to stay. Because even if he does that, he's not going to stay in power for the next 30 years. No, he'll have to give up now. Even if he delays the elections, what Will he win? 6 months? 9 months? 18 months? He won't win in heaven. He's not going to stay there until he's in a wheelchair and they bring him back to us. He says he's the president and Macron. So the tr. So it's serious. It's serious as a subject, huh? I mean, you're not here to laugh. You know what I mean? I'm going to cut that. I'll cut that in the editing. So I was saying that this plan, in my opinion, is. Is not very credible. Okay? It's not very credible. I think that the best plan. The best plan. Well, I'm not in his head, but if I were him, this is how I would have done it. Remember the American elections? There was Obama, right? And then Obama, he did two terms. Then there was Biden. But many people consider Biden to be Obama's third term. In fact, there almost had to be a fourth. Imagine if Kamala Harris had won the election. Well, that would have been Obama's fourth term. In fact, it works in the United States. In France, too, it works by clan. It's clans. In Russia, it works the same way, too. Remember, Putin was president then. He put Medvedev in office and didn't let him run again, so he put Medvedev in office, who became president after him. Do you know what I mean? So whatever the country, we always have more of a clan mentality than a democratic one. Here, everything we call democracy is just a show. It's just a play that's happening before our eyes. There's no democracy. I mean, whether it's in France or Egypt or Russia, in the United States, it's the same. It's the same mechanisms, except that some countries play the game better than others, for example. But let's say that the United States plays the game of democracy better. You know, I mean, theater is like when you turn on the TV and you're looking for a movie. There are good movies and there are crappy ones. It's the same. Democracy is a movie. There are good movies, you know, movies that you can grab some popcorn and watch and maybe you believe in, right? And there are other movies. Well, you can't get into the storyline. Egypt. Democracy in Egypt, okay? I. I mean, they're bad. So I was saying that the situation we're in will probably make it more interesting for Macron to organize elections in 2027. To take a guy who weighs 45 kilograms. So the next president, I can already tell you that he weighs 45 kilogram. I don't know his name, but 45 kilogram. Okay, well, I don't think he has any children. Zero children. I think he's a guy, you know, from these days. We don't know much anymore, do we? These things. So everything seems, uh. It's good. A guy about whom there are hesitations on the general orientations. Isn't that right? Grauman says so we know more or less what's going to happen. He's going to send a 45kg guy who's going to arrive, and then the French people are going to vote for him. And I'll tell you something, I'll even predict something else. Now I'm starting to have you see, by dint of talking about a crystal ball, now I'm starting to have a crystal ball. Once the French people vote for him, once he comes to power, this is what they're going to do the next day. And that's what's terrible about the French. The next day they're going to say, yes, he's not my president. We should call him impeachment or resign. It's going to be so and so. So we're going to call him Mr. So and so. So and so will be president. So and so. You're going to hear, he's not my president. You're going to hear so and institution. And you're going to hear so and so as a program, I'll give you 1000. When it comes to that, once he finishes his five year term, he'll run again. You see, you know, you want to know he's going to revise it for himself. I mean, French politics is starting to become something. We're on the edge of reality. We're entering the fifth dimension. We're no longer in something logical. I mean, be careful. The more logic you put into it, the more you try to analyze it with a rational approach and everything, the more you're going to get lost. I mean, just stop. I'll stop you right there. If you're rational, you won't understand anything. Well, you'll understand, use the rational method. When you get results, you do the opposite. And from there you're much closer to reality than with your initial rational method. That's more or less what I can tell you today. So Macron, in my opinion, is going to Install a. What do you call it? A puppet. There you have it, a 45kg puppet. So 45kg is light, which may make it easier to control with wires. Lately I haven't been very active on YouTube and social media. If you've noticed, I'm writing a book. I'll tell you right away what it's about, because I was provoked. There you have it. I was provoked. I decided to respond. Are you familiar with this book, We Never Walked on the Moon? It's a book that disproves a state lie, a lie of expectation from the Cold War era. We Never Walked on the Moon. For those who are watching this video without watching it, the Apollo hoax is coming. And this book has indeed raised a lot of questions, completely legitimate questions. For example. So what I'm doing now is writing Volume two. It's not a second edition, it's Volume two. It's the sequel. The rest is to answer a number of questions and delve into some details. And honestly, if we read Volume one, Volume two, and the whole time, Volume one, Volume two, and still believe in this imposture, it's because we're really ready to believe just about anything. That's it, my friends. Thank you for watching this video so far. See you in the next one. And, well, I mean, as long as the French continue to vote for people from Macron's team, as long as they continue to be Europhiles, right? Privately, Eurosceptics, collectively, Europhiles, it's very difficult to do anything for them. We can only deplore it. We can only see the collapse right in front of us, the train wreck coming at us in slow motion. But there's no way. There's no way. We really have to push these people to take their destiny into their own hands once and for all. See you soon.