Lecture Livre ESCROLOGIE Chapitre 1 : Préparation pour Audible

My friends, Good evening. A special Video Today, by request, I am preparing an audio version of my book Swindle. For now it is available in paperback in Kindle format and many people have asked me to record it in audio format to make it available on Audible. So today I am going to read. I am practicing reading the first chapter and I decided to record this session to share it with you and then I hope that in time I will be able to read the entire book. So here we go. We are going to read the book Swindle. Only the action of redemption will be counted to you and not repentance, because the celebs also sometimes repent. As the Gospel according to Ivan says, not resisting violence is a sin, but it is an even greater sin than remaining indifferent to the spectacle of violence. Remember that even silent reflections are actions. It is from the ideas of invisible protest that an invisible but powerful field of protest is formed, without which manifest action is unthinkable, even if you only think you participate in a small way in the single and common cause of defending man. All this was written in the Gospel the Antechamber of paradise by Alexander Zinoviev the End of the World the first thing that can be criticized about ecological radicalism is that it has taken away the will to live from millions of young Westerners. If the future is bleak and the end of the world is coming tomorrow, what is the point of projecting ourselves into a future that will be apocalyptic? Is it worth working, studying, starting a family, having children, protecting one's health, and even simply dreaming? The west is a civilization locked in pessimism and depression from childhood. Television, school, literature, and the media, they say, are full of catastrophic discourse, worthy of a sect that is waiting for and somewhere wishing for the end of the world. In 2021, the medical journal INET published a study on climate anxiety in children and young people. The researchers interviewed 10 people aged 16 to 25 to collect their feelings. Here are the results. Respondents from all countries were worried about climate change, 59% were very or extremely worried, and 84% were at least moderately worried. More than 50% reported each of the following sadness, anxiety, anger, helplessness, despair, and guilt. More than 45% of respondents said that their feelings about climate change negatively affect their daily lives and functioning, and many reported a large number of negative thoughts about it. For example, 75% said they thought the future was scary, and 83% said they thought people had failed to take care of the planet. Respondents rated government responses to climate change negatively and reported feeling betrayal. More than comfortable. Climate Related anxiety and distress were correlated with perceptions of an inadequate government response and associated feelings of betrayal. Yet these young people may have other, more tangible reasons for feeling anxious. One is that they feel the first generation in a long time to be poorer than their parents. They will have to work harder to pay the bills. Many will never have a roof over their heads and will have to work when they are old and sick. Inflation is inexorably reducing their standard of living, and they may suffer a world war or two. The state, aided by 10 of the world's top billionaires, is doing what is necessary to address their climate concerns. By the time these young people are in their 40s, the only cars allowed on the roads will be Ferraris, Lamborghinis and other sports cars as exempted by the European Union. To get around, they will have to walk, cycle or take public transport. Air travel will be subject to a strict limit on a human life. It will be one or two trips from birth to death. The rich and politicians will still be able to take a private jet for long or short journeys, while the population will have to listen, declaiming the pensive rants of ecotiology while asserting a superior moral stance. Food, heating, hygiene and all daily activities will be subject to permits and bans, invariably resulting in purifying levies that will finance the lifestyle of the upper caste. Anxiety amplifies fears A person who suffers from a fear of flying interprets every sound, vibration and phenomenon as the most natural warning sign of an impending catastrophe. For millions of people who are victims of propaganda, the slightest piece of information becomes a categorical sign of the prophesied cataclysm. For example, a glacier has melted, so we are all going to die. It is the end. We must pay carbon taxes, accept repressive laws, and wait for death for a glacier that has melted. Have we asked ourselves the following questions before resorting to catastrophic and irrational explanations? Are glaciers eternal? In addition to seasonal variations, don't they have other cycles of melting and replenishment that last decades or centuries of which a human would only see a small fraction? Will taxes and repressive laws change the life of the glacier? Is a melting or forming glacier a problem that we must plan at the cost of our lives? Does a melting glacier herald the end of the world? Is it bad for a glacier to start melting? Is it our fault when we see the agendas promoted by billionaires who define themselves as philanthropists for tax reasons, large banks without a qualm, and ideological pressure groups, we should not be under Any illusions. They are not acting out of humanitarianism or love for their fellow man. What may seem like whims are in reality major financial and political projects that systematically end with the slaving away of a greater number of people for the benefit of an oligarchy that stirs up problems created out of whole cloth and then claims that it has the solution. The typical example is Bill Gates. When we talk about a crisis, he is never far away. European capitals welcome him like a head of state, and his statements, which he does not endorse, are repeated by the media without any perspective or critical thinking. In recent years, he has declared war on meat, linking his crusade to the climate movement. Today. All it takes is to say that X is bad for the climate, and the media will unanimously agree and outdo each other. X being any product or human activity. Bill Gates has therefore issued an ecological farce, declaring that the production and consumption of animal meat is destructive for the planet. In the process, he declared that all Western countries should only consume meat, synthetic meat. Good news. Gates has invested heavily in companies that manufacture this synthetic meat. At the same time, he funds studies that show that natural meat kills. When it comes to scientific studies, it is important to know that the average scientist is broke. Funding scholarships and subsidies are becoming increasingly rare. In order to survive, many researchers have put themselves at the service of its lobby, which pays well as long as they are told what they want to hear. It wasn't the climate activists who invented the concept, but the tobacco industry around the 1950s. At the time, real doctors promoted cigarette brands. In magazines and mainstream newspapers, it was common to see a doctor dressed in blue overalls holding a cigarette, advising pregnant women to smoke or proclaiming that the brand he was sponsoring caused fewer respiratory illnesses than the competition. Tobacco companies are known for investing in research centers that are completely subservient to their interests. Furthermore, these centers are set up as nonprofit organizations or foundations that are tax exempt. By paying them money, the tobacco company can even reduce its tax bill and increase its ESG score while obtaining customized scientific results, as numerous lawsuits in the early 2000s demonstrated. This practice was common in the last century, but it hasn't disappeared. For example, in 2017, the foundation for a Tobacco Free World, or FSFW, was created in New York as a 501C3, meaning it is a non profit. As it is, it appears to be fighting tobacco use. But this is only true on paper. FSW is entirely funded by Philippe Maurice International, which has committed to giving it $1 billion over 12 years. PMI is the world's largest employer and manufacturer of cigarettes and e cigarettes. It has more than 80,000 employees and a vast portfolio of brands including Marl, Bora, Rotman, Benson and Edge. The FSFW, which is 100% dependent on PMI, provides books and student loans to researchers who find what they are asked to find. Often the funding path is opaque so that it cannot be easily traced. For example, the FSFW paid for research at the oldest university in Catania, the University of Catania. By doing so through a limited liability company based in Italy and called a Claw srl, Catania produced controversial studies downplaying the dangers of electronic cigarettes. Read in 7, volume 393, issue 10,190 of June 22, 2019 the Climate and Political Ecology Lobbies use the same tricks. That is why they keep shouting we must follow science because science is simply written at their request. If Karl Marx were alive today, he would have said that science has become the discourse of the ruling classes. Obviously, because a custom study signed by researchers from a prestigious university can fetch a million euros. In 2008, the prestigious London Institute of Economics found itself embroiled in a scandal because it awarded a PhD to Sayf Al Islam Gaddafi to please his father who was distributing millions to the institution. The rejector in question had shown no effort to study or open the books. But today everything is for sale, and the scandals that leak into the media are only the tip of a sinister iceberg, most of which is covered up. The scientific method demands rigor and integrity above all else. In an era of widespread corruption, we have reached a point where we cannot trust claims presented under the guise of science. We must always ask ourselves whether there is a political or financial agenda behind them. The Global Burden of Disease GBD study is published regularly and analyzes the burden of disease worldwide. This is an index used by the WHO and health authorities in many countries to estimate the cost of injuries and diseases and then guide their public health policies. The GBD study was launched at the initiative of the World bank. It involves 3,600 researchers across 145 countries and is eagerly awaited by health professionals. In 2019, the GBD arrived with surprising news. Red meat kills 4,896,000 people per year. It causes diabetes, strokes, heart disease and cancer. The media are singing this song in unison. Vegetarians have always been right. Meat kills. However, meat is very well tolerated by our bodies. It is not inflammatory and we do not know anyone who is allergic to meat. The interview takes a hard look at the GBD 2019. These conclusions about the existence of additional causal relationships for red meat are inconsistent with other recent systematic reviews and meta analyses. The International Nutritional Recommendations Consortium, also known as Nutrarex, conducted four parallel systematic reviews of randomized trials and observational studies. The consortium reported finding low to very low certainty evidence that diets low in unprocessed red meat may lead to very small reductions in the risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, myocardial infarction, type 2 diabetes and overall mortality over the course of a lifetime. Read from Int volume 399, issue 2332, April 2, 2022. In this same edition, Int 7 also informs us that for the GBD 2019 the data were obtained in a different way than usual. All previous GBD risk factor analyses have used data from peer reviewed systematic reviews and meta analyses published the journal as well as Global Cancer Research fund criteria. The GBD 2019 analysis differs from this approach in that the GBD risk factor contributors have produced or updated their own systematic review of each dietary risk and its associated outcomes. In other words, in the 2019 edition they did not work with peer reviewed figures, but scientifically self certified them. This means that these figures are pulled out of a magician's hat. The journal Nature also criticizes the GBD 2019 in a February 5, 2024 article by Alice Stanton entitled Unacceptable Use of Substandard Measures in Policy Decisions that Mandate Large Reductions in Animal Source Foods. Further on in the article, many recent highly influential reports, including those from the Global Burden of Disease, recommend significantly reducing or completely eliminating animal products, particularly ruminant products, red meat and dairy products from the human diet. And it strongly suggests that these dietary changes are beneficial not only to the health of the planet, but also to human health. However, as this perspective explains, there are concerns about the quality and transparency of the data, the validity of the assumptions, and the relevance of the statistical modeling used to calculate the overall health estimates that support the claimed benefits to human health. One might go one step further on nature and insect and ask the what got into the GBD officials that made them start releasing fake studies? In fact, something important happened between the 2017 and 2019 editions of their report. Bill Gates met with them, sang their praises in the media, and then injected money through his foundation. So, according to the Farmers forum magazine of June 3, 2024, Bill Gates owns 14th of all the farmland in the United States and is waging a war on meat consumption. In 2021, he declared, all rich countries must consume 100% synthetic beef. At the same time, he has invested in Companies that grow meat from cells fed with chemicals or manufacture years of success from plants and chemicals. Here again there is a new form of capitalism. It positions itself on a product of no interest, uses its political and financial influence to promote it. It wants to make meat disappear so that it can sell its substitute products. So it is going to launch an all out campaign of manipulation to change science, the political course and even public perception. Gates also invests in insects and vaccines. On the other hand, many people are starting to wake up to this manipulation. Lab Grown meat is already banned in Florida and Italy. Companies that are pushing for so called plant based foods are starting to come back from it. In June 2024, Joe Erlinger, the chief operating officer of the McDonald's chain told the Wall Street Journal that the plant based burger is a plant based burger. The fast food giant is going to remove it from its menus because the public is not asking for it. Similarly, in the supermarket, the plant based food sections are constantly in destocking mode because customers are sulking. Before Bill Gates initiatives, humans have never described their food using the word plant based. Even vegetarians talk about lettuce, tomatoes or eggplants. Never plants. This word is an attempt to force undifferentiated food and to provide anything under a Vague label. In 2019, when the GBD 2019 was released announcing the deadly dangers of meat and suggesting that it be banned, the fake meat campaign in which Bill Gates, the fake meat company in which Bill Gates had invested billions of myths saw its stock price reach $235. Today the stock is trading around $6.50. We are told that meat is dangerous for our health, but also for the climate. Well, not so fast. During the middle Ages there was global warming that lasted for more than three centuries, particularly in the North Atlantic region. Between Approximately the years 950 and 1250, temperatures rose to the point of producing green pastures over much of the grand inland. Even though this country has glaciers that date back more than 400,000 years, others formed during the Little Ice Age that followed the warming. Between 1420 and 1570 there was a period of low solar activity called the Sporarian minimum. This was followed by an even greater decrease called the mander minimum between 1645 and 1715. Then an increase in solar activity up to the present day while experiencing fluctuations and other shorter cycles. These cycles and their effects on the earth's climate have been well documented as far back as we can go. What is shocking is the use of these natural variations to frighten and demoralize the population and then demand financial levies to keep an industry that generates billions going. As the following graph shows, which goes back to 1990, solar activity drives the Earth's climate. The more energy we receive, the hotter it gets. The less we receive, the colder it gets. There is strictly only a climate emergency and all the money demanded in the name of climate and extortion under false pretenses, eating a burger or not, will change absolutely nothing. The many scientists who call for reason have no media presence and have agreed to censor them in order to maintain a psychosis that is more profitable than the truth. The result is that a cumbersome and costly climate bureaucracy is viciously insinuating itself into all the economic and administrative cogs of European countries. Figuratively, it has the same effect as a can of sand or molasses thrown into an airplane engine. To the French people, Belize and other Europeans, we are stealing their share of development and well being from generations. Being afraid of global warming when you live in Europe is like fearing an ice age when you live in the Emirates or Saudi Arabia. Phobias are always absurd, but these are valid without the need for carbon. Let's imagine a country where the temperature reaches 51 degrees Celsius in the middle of a heatwave. Fear of having lowered it by 1.5 degrees Celsius by the end of the century and sacrificing everything on the hotel of this phobia. If this vague prophecy comes true, they will have 49.5 degrees Celsius in the summer. They will still be far from the ice covering the sand dunes. The equation is posed in the same terms in Europe. Towards the end of the road at the beginning of September, when most of the Northern hemisphere is still sunbathing on the beaches or strolling in T shirts, Europeans see single digit temperatures at night towards the month of October, when it is almost 30 degrees Celsius in Antalya and holidaymakers are still flocking. Europe has already turned on its heating and is burning unaffordable gas because of taxes and confiscatory levies. Of course, politicians and other activists often talk about climate justice. It's a way of saying that European peoples must make sacrifices for other countries, particularly those in the south, that could suffer from rising temperatures. Except that the 10 countries don't really care about the climate and haven't asked the Europeans for anything. For example, apart from the narrow valleys of the Nile, Egypt is a desert country. As soon as you move away from this green zone, you arrive in an arid desert that looks like lunar soil. However, in this country, they don't hesitate to heat outdoor swimming pools so that tourists who come in winter can swim in them. In the emirate of Qatar, bus stops are air conditioned and large industrial air conditioners blow cold air into the state, places where large gatherings take place. These countries are adapting and moving forward. They have no phobia or complexes about using energy. France, which has invested in nuclear power to the point that its population could have had free electricity, a bit like the monarchies of the Middle east that have oil in their subsoil, has taken inflationary measures by indexing the price of electricity to that of gas. No country in the world is crazy enough to do that. Indexing the product, the price of a product that we have in abundance to the price of a product that we do not have and that we obtain on a fluctuating market. It is a bit like Saudi Arabia indexing the price of fuel at the pump in Riyadh or Jada to the price of a bottle of meat on Parisian terraces. If Algeria or Russia decide to restrict the flow of gas, the French will find themselves paying more for their electricity, even though it is produced in their country. This is pure sabotage. Added to this are the taxes imposed on political correctness and compulsory solidarity, which are becoming paralyzing for the economy and the exercise of fundamental freedoms. For example, during the presidency of Jack Chirac From 1995 to 2007, AIDS was the major cause. It was claimed that the majority of the African population was HIV positive and that the lack of treatment meant that the life expectancy of the sick was particularly short. This was met with alarmist opinion that this situation would decimate a large part of the continent's population. At the time this book went to press, the African population was doing well and the population was growing exponentially. As usual, the European political establishment announced an imaginary problem and then demanded money to solve it. Years later, we see that the prophecies have failed, but we continue to pay without remembering why we are doing it. Chirik, who was traveling to Tokyo as part of the Franco Japanese Economic Forum, had launched the idea of a solidarity tax on airline tickets, the tsba, which bears his name, the earth above water. The aim of this tax is to fund the fight against AIDS in Africa. In terms of the liberal economy supposedly practiced in Europe, there is no link between a person exercising their right to travel by plane and AIDS patients in a distant place. What right do they have to force the former to fund the latter? Furthermore, fans captured under the guise of generosity with other people's money rarely end up in the officially announced destination. Several countries, including Norway and the United Kingdom, have committed to following Chirac and taxing their air traffic in this way, except that when it came to implementation, they failed to do so, allowing France to undermine its competitiveness with its inflationary measures. Furthermore, since 2020 the TSBA has been increased by an ecotax what is the connection between AIDS and ecology? If you ask an activist, Willow will probably tell you that the climate injustice caused by Western lifestyles and the source of all African diseases began with AIDS and malaria, and that it is only fair to make Westerners pay for repar operations in 2024 while France is struggling with a hidden bankruptcy caused by decades of fraudulent spending and plundering of public accounts. The 2025 Finance Law will triple the Iraq tax from 460 million in annual levies to 1.5 billion. Like all ideological and financial flights of fancy, no impact study has been carried out. The starting point is this simplistic idea that all you have to do is integrate yourself into the transactions between an air its customers to demand levies, thinking that people will submit and pay. Except that there comes a time when this logic no longer holds water. With the profusion of comparison sites and travel influencers who reach millions of viewers, the consumer is no longer as captive as before. He has access to information and adapts quickly to find good deals. Instead of taking France, travelers will simply pass through London, Geneva or Frankfurt. They could even make this first crossing by train and end up ruining the French air sector. That's it my friends. That was the first chapter. The next one is the climate business. Ok, so well, thank you for listening so far. Your comments will of course be welcome. I hope to finish the entire book at some point and then edit it or have it edited properly by professionals so that it can be played on audible. There you have it. So I await your comments and then we'll see you another time in another video. And then good night to those who listen while sleeping. See you soon.