Les "Hommages" de Macron

Hello, my friends, in this time of intense news, I haven't been here for quite some time because I had things to say almost every day. I could have come and made a video, but my head was full of unspoken things, things that you can't just say online. Well, to tell you the truth, you know what I'm going to tell you? It's not primary anti Macronism. Honestly, I really wouldn't dare use such a theme for political reasons. But there is something that shocks me. So maybe it's the African in me that's shocked, but I'll share it with you. Tell me what you think. I saw Chirac, or rather Macron, paying tribute to Chirac. When Chirac died, I saw a ceremony. I think it was on the Parvis de Invalid. I don't really watch these things, but the image shocked me. There was Makron standing and the coffin was placed at his feet. The coffin was placed on the ground and Macron stood over the dead man. In my opinion, the dead man was not in a dignified position. It was not paying homage. Makran's polished shoes were 20 cm from the dead man's head. So I say, maybe it's normal. It's the African in me speaking. At the time, I had googled a little, I had looked back a little. I said to myself, well, maybe that's how it is with them. What do you want? So I looked at Jirak, paying homage to Mitorin. When Mitterin died shortly after the end of his second term, Chirac was president, there was no such scene. I went back a little. Mitterin paid homage to Bergoevois, who had committed suicide. Finally, he paid tribute to Francois de Grosseuvre, head of Presidential Hunting, who also committed suicide. He had a propensity for firearms, so that explains the suicide a little. There was no such scene. Then in recent days, we have the death of Jean Paul Balman. Then I learned that someone told me verbally, oh, yes, there's a ceremony. And Macron was paying tribute to Belmondo without seeing or looking. I imagined the same scene as with Chira. I imagined a Parvian standing with his shoes polished and the body placed on the ground there to put in front of him. I didn't want to see. I didn't want to look at such an image. I have a lot of respect for Bel Mondo, not much for the other one, and I didn't want to see. I said to myself, I'm sure that's how it happened. And then, well, I had this voice in my head, telling me, yes, but you didn't even see it. You're blaming the guy. You're pulling things out of your head. You're making inferences based on. Based on past data. All that I said to myself, I'll go and see. I'll look. Macron, Belmondo tribute. The first image that comes up. It's a sure thing. I don't understand this story. I don't understand who created this protocol. Was it him? Was he badly advised? Why did he lay the dead at his feet like that? At the same time, we have images. I'm going to do a bit of editing. In this video, I'll show you the images I'm talking about. There's a death in Russia. There's the death of a minister. I think it's the Minister of Public Affairs Emergencies or something like that, who died. Putin comes to pay his respects. The level of dignity, whether it's the dead person or the person who comes to pay his respects, the Russian president is absolutely extraordinary. First level, absolutely extraordinary. There's a respect, a deference, a very strong dignity that emerges from the scene. And we could call this scene paying tribute to the dead. It's shocking. It's shocking on a political level. I wanted to tell you something about politics here, because before it wasn't political, it was human. I have the impression that Macron has acted, or rather isn't acting, like someone who is going to have important presidential elections very soon. I don't have the impression that he has that mindset. It surprises me sometimes. I think to myself that either he's in a kamikaze mindset who doesn't give a damn, potentially he might not even run again, or he has a plan B. A plan B that we don't know about today, but we can probably already guess the premises. The premises are already there. Because if he has a plan B, if this gentleman has a plan B, he's not going to come up with his Plan B ex Nilo, the day before the election. He's going to come up with it at some point, but he'll come up with it by building it on premises that he's already in the process of doing to install today, which should already be there. There you go. So this is something that personally worries me. Something else I wanted to tell you something else that's been on my mind lately. I see that a lot of people are talking about Frexit. Frexit. I'll tell you something. Frexite is a thing of the past. It's over. It's over. So Frexit is nice, but it's so 2010s. It's so 2000s. Look, look. We're in the United Kingdom. We're in the United Kingdom. We're no longer part of the European Union. And yet we're following exactly where you're going. We're following in your footsteps, we're following your path step by step on the path of other European countries. Why? Why are we no longer part of the European Union? Before we were told, yes, but it's imposed on us. It comes from the eu. There's nothing we can do. The EU is no longer imposing things. Where does that come from? It comes from above. The person giving the orders is no longer there. In fact, what has happened is that there are several ways of rejecting democracy. So one of the ways of rejecting democracy, the denial of basic democracy, is called the transfer of power. I'm not talking about ground zero, I'm not talking about level zero or what we practice a lot in Africa, where you have a dictator who stays in power for life, rigged elections, single party rule, president for life, hot tides and so on. I'm not talking about that. Well, everyone knows that it's very simple. But that's what we do here, because we don't have a way with words. Whereas in your country, it's generally done by shifting the center of power. That means you're given the opportunity to elect someone, to set up an administration, a team and everything else. In reality, these people no longer run anything. It's over. You can elect them, but they no longer run anything. And in fact, decisions are made elsewhere in complicated mechanisms that no one understands and that are very difficult to sanction by a democratic vote, you see? So you're given an empty shell that you can vote for if you want. Power has been transferred elsewhere. The content is elsewhere today. The European Union. The European Union has failed. The European Union. The escape from Alcatraz, if you like. The day. The United Kingdom. And that was years ago. The vote was in 2016. Five years ago, when the United Kingdom, such an important country, left the European Union, it was clear to those who managed. The part that the European Union is, has been. The European Union is finished now. Decisions are made directly. We are no longer connected to international bodies. We are no longer in Davos. We are no longer in tune with the wishes of American billionaires. Right? We are now closer to these decision making centers. They are the ones who decide. Do you see what I mean? It means that today, practically speaking, I would Be interested if I had been French, if I had had to vote in the 2022 elections, if there is a vote, of course, it is not a given. I would rather have a candidate who talks to me about independence. Not from the European Union, which changes nothing today, but real independence. Independence from these. Not from these new centers of power, but from these centers of power, like Davos, the uef, and the American billionaires who today, de facto, are making decisions for the French people. Right? That's the de facto one who manages. Those are the ones who decide. In any case, you have to see what they think, what they say, and then you wait a little while, you'll see that it goes down, down, down. And when it happens, it gets into the heads of your politicians directly. So that's that. Independence. I remember. I remember France at the time when it was forming a coalition to go and bomb Iraq. I remember Vilpin speaking at the podium, I think it was at the Security Council. And he expressed a dissenting voice on behalf of France. He said, we are an old country. He taught a lesson to those countries that were there. He taught his lessons to those henchmen who were there ready to just go and bomb for whatever reason. Just, let's go. They were obsessed with that. And I saw a different voice, and it was this kind of voice that made France great. But this kind of voice could only be expressed because France was independent, you see, Today it is no longer an independent country. Today, I'm not interested in what Macron thinks. I'm not interested in what the future president thinks. I'm not interested in what the average French person thinks or votes or whatever. It is of no interest. What interests me is what the boss thinks. The boss is not even in France. It is not even French. What interests me is what the groups I mentioned think. Because what goes on in their heads is immediately carried out. The slightest whim of Mr. Bill, right? The slightest whim that passes through the heads of Bill or Claus or whoever is carried out. Manu is a soldier in France. Manu, right? He is the one who decides. And the military, huh, Is the police who come by force to implement this will on people against their will. There you have it, my friends. You understand more or less the ideas that I had in mind these last few weeks. There you have it. I have made a summary of them as acceptable and benign as possible. There you have it. Okay, thank you, my friends. I will come back. I will come back when I feel I am capable of saying hello to the lady, right? That's the idea. See you soon, my friends.