
Monologue-style YouTube commentary reacting to reports that Iran fired roughly 180–200 missiles at Israel. The speaker argues that there was no conventional bombing—few if any explosions, negligible blast damage, and a reported single casualty from falling debris—suggesting the missiles lacked proper explosive warheads and instead carried improvised low-explosive or incendiary payloads (black powder/newspaper). The speaker discusses technical trade-offs (range vs. payload), possible Iranian motives (saving face), risks of escalation, and potential economic consequences (oil infrastructure attacks and global price shocks).
Good morning, my friends. Many of you have contacted me to ask me to comment on the Iranian bombing of Israel with 180 missiles, 200 according to sources, last night. So I was actually watched after receiving a salvo. Is that not a pun message? I went to sea. So I would like to talk to you about bombing. But there was no bombing. In fact, I looked carefully. I watched all the videos available online. There was no bombing. The death toll is exactly zero. Well, there was one missile that fell. But when I say fall, I don't mean explosion, I mean physically. Because it would seem that these missiles were not completely without danger. That is to say, you have a metal tube, a sort of. I don't know, imagine a water pipe, a sewer pipe like that, made of metal, with a cap, a motor. It's still quite a heavy object. And if it falls on someone, it can actually injure or even kill. And in this specific case, it fell on an unfortunate person. I saw the footage. The guy was standing there on a sidewalk. There's a tube falling from the sky, and then it looks like he was killed. That's the danger of these missiles. But missiles, normally, I say normally, except that nowadays we're in 2024. The word normally, I think we're going to have to gradually stop using this word. I even think we'll have to remove it from the dictionary. The normally in the real one, too. These are two words that are quite divisive these days. I think normally I would say that a missile has a warhead, and when it falls, it explodes. And in reality, that's where the damage comes from. It's not the scrap metal that causes the damage in a missile. It's the explosive charge. Except that in this specific case, there was no explosive charge. For example, I saw one of the images where you have a missile that falls not very far from a building. So you have a building with windows. It was dark, right? So I can't identify the type of building. But let's say a building with windows and lights on. The missile explodes, it falls. So two things. First, what struck me is that the windows didn't explode. You know, the windows didn't go away. While I have seen. It has happened to me two or three times in my life to see scenes of gas explosions, domestic gas, quite simply, you know, well, there is a gas leak. Sometimes it explodes over a fairly wide area. Not a single pane of glass remains standing. Because when there is a blast, when a blast of air hits the windows, well, the first thing it does is throw Them inside. And then there is even someone in my family who was in a similar situation with a window in Switzerland, at U Blanc. For those who remember, there was once a gas explosion. And what saved her was that the curtain, she had a very heavy curtain that was wrapped up by the curtain. And from behind the windows where the glass arrived, there was no glass that exploded there. There's no broken glass. So maybe we'll find images with broken glass. Probably a direct impact from a piece of tool. I'd like something else. In these explosions we see some kind of scorch, if you like, in the night, or some kind of tongue like sparks. Imagine someone using a grinder to cut sheet metal, for example. What does it do? It makes this kind of tongue like spark. Yes, I may ask, right? It did that. Now, what kind of explosive does that? Honestly, what kind of explosive? You're not going to get sparks like that with military explosives. Generally. What does that is gunpowder. It's black powder. Newspapers, Right? That is to say, I see the missile. And the reality is that probably, and it is very likely, what I am saying here is that the missiles in question are fired from a long distance. So it is a bit like the Airbus 340, you know. That is why the Airbus 340 was not very successful. It is either you take a full load of passengers, a full load of gasoline, or a full load of luggage. You can't take everything, otherwise you need two. There is one that takes off with the passengers, the other that follows behind with the luggage. So there is a problem of range, there is a problem of action radius. So probably the Iranians placed their missile on a ramp, they put fuel oil in it. Don't laugh. There are lots of missiles, there are lots of rocket engines and everything that runs on fuel oil. So they fill their fuel oil with enough autonomy, right? So that it reaches its destination. Once they have filled it for the destination, they look in their containers and there you can see in terms of payload, what it can carry. We have 750 grams. We have 1.5. Well, if you have 1.5, what do you do?
Huh?
What do you do with 1.5?
Huh?
You take black powder, you take a big, big black plastic can on the head of the missile, you pour the black powder. It's not 500 grams, 700 grams, whatever you can. Then you remove the black cap and you take newspapers. Because honestly, I have the impression that's what the missiles were.
Huh?
It's black powder. Then they pushed newspapers inside, didn't they? And then they launch. They must've used newspaper for some of the missiles that were probably damp or even wet. And the result, well, you can see it. It falls. It makes a noise like metal crashing and all that. And that's where the story ends. So I don't know what he's up to. So I looked on X at what we used to call old people, uh, those under 20 years old who might know what he used to call Twitter. There you go. I'm one of them, unfortunately. I looked at Twitter, didn't I? And I saw the Cayman who was tweeting in Hebrew. When I saw that, I thought to myself, if this isn't World War III, it's still an important sign of World War 3. And finally, all this to throw you.
Off.
Here, just as an example. We saw an Israeli bomb fall on Lebanon recently. You know what? Many people at the time mistook it for an atomic bomb. The clouds moved away because it was giving off so much heat. Now I wonder what the game is. So one of the possible games is that Iran wants to save face. Because it is important to know that for many regimes in the region, including the Israeli one, many regimes in the region, saving face is more important than anything else. It would seem that. Well, it is perhaps the culture of those places that requires it. So Iran felt obliged to the world it is watching and also, and most certainly to its local population to show itself strong. Why? Because if you have a regime. If you have a regime that shows itself weak on the international stage, it will have difficulty imposing discipline and respect and obedience and conformity locally. I mean, if you are a regime, you declare that you are truly divinely inspired and all that. By the way, Netanyahu also has communications with God. I mean, everyone in the region is more or less connected. I mean, over there you can receive instructions directly from everyone by fax or 666. And that's why it's an extremely dangerous area. So you can't say inside that you are a very strong regime and all that. If you get slapped outside. There you go. They have to. They have to a little bit. Now, what really bothers me is that. And by the way, this morning I immediately went to fill up the car when I woke up, because seriously, I have a full tank. I can show you. Because if the Israelis respond about Iran, and if they respond by attacking the oil installations, then in Europe, we are at €5 per liter. I mean, easy, easy. We will reach our climate objectives much faster than expected. So there you have it. So people talk about world War three and all that. Well, honestly, we are not going to. Well, you will tell me that World War I was started because Bourgeois was shot down in a place no one remembers the name of. By the way, he was shot down in Saravo, you see? So it's true that you're going to tell me that a piece of tall falling like that on a Palestinian could also trigger a world war. It's possible, right? I mean, at this point, we live in an extremely fragile world, an extremely shitty world. So, yes, everything is possible. What I'm telling you, my friends, is that when a world war breaks out, there's good news and bad news. Well, the bad news is that it causes a lot of deaths, especially the Palestinians, right? People who believe in it, people who are very keen on it, who say, okay, that's good. I'm going to go ahead and settle the score with that guy. It doesn't matter what language they say it in. They can say it in French, English, German, Hebrew, Russian, Arabic, Persian, it doesn't matter. But he's going to say, I'm going to settle the score with him. He's dead. That's it. And there are others, and there are others who speak just as many languages who will become millionaires. And that's the good news. They will become millionaires. They will get rich. So the wars, the last wars, the first ones, killed a lot of people, but they also allowed for a great reset of the economy. They allowed the restart, didn't they, of the 30 glorious years. Whereas between 1929 and 1939, we were living in the Great Depression. And then suddenly we arrive in 1945. It's the beginning of the 30 glorious years that will last until the mid-70s. And what is it? What is it? What is it?
Huh?
What's in between?
Huh?
What's in between? There are two world wars, huh? Resetting the economy, resetting the production, tool destruction, razing everything. When you raise, you take this city, for example. Everyone is equipped. People have a V, machines, they have the Internet, they have a car, right? Uh, they have electricity. They have everything. You bomb a city like that, huh? So just to say. Just to say, with 100,000 inhabitants, 100,000 inhabitants who are fully equipped, you can't sell them anything, almost nothing. You can still sell them milk, bread, things like that. Oranges, yes, but no more. So you don't really have much growth with them. It's a pain. So what do you do? A good bombing at that point, what's going to happen is that the population decreases Right? That's the damage itself. The population will decrease by a good, let's say, 20%. But what you'll have left is 800 consumers this time. Consumers ready for anything, right? People? Even underwear. They're ready to buy it, boy. Because there's nothing left, you know? But where does the money come from? Don't worry, there will be. You're the one who's going to pay. There will be the martial plan. We'll give them money. We'll fill their pockets. We'll fill their pockets. Go and consume. We'll let them go. Starting blocks. Bam. They leave. They run away. They buy.
Okay?
That's the world, right? And I mean, if you think there's anything else than what I'm telling you, you're still. I won't say naive, but hey, there you go. We understand each other, right? Right? You're still in the. You're still in another world, right? You live in a romantic, idealistic world, all that. That's not how it works, right? That's all over. It's over. Thank you, my friends, for listening to this story. And one day, there will be a bombing raid. I just commented, but what you saw. No, it wasn't a bombing raid. It was fireworks. There you go. See you soon, my friends. Sleep soundly. Everything is going very well.
More from Aldo

La FIN du Royaume-Uni ? L'Ecosse, l'Irlande du Nord et le Pays de Galles veulent partir !

Analyse Présidentielles 2027 : Marine le Pen remet ENCORE le voile sur la table !

Scandale "60 Millions de Consommateurs" : la France mange des pâtes contaminées au Cadmium !

2 dossiers : Accident d'autogyre en Italie & un pilote sauvé par le parachute du Cirrus






