
Speaker delivers an extended political monologue (from the UK) criticizing the French/Western political class as amateurish, ideologically destructive, and mentally incompetent. Uses historical analogies (Stalin, Mao, Roman taxation), social-psychological metaphors (youth as caricatures of thugs), and anecdotes (flat tire/mental asylum, Zuckerberg/Meta) to argue elites promote "decivilization"—weakening public services (postal service, police, buses), prioritizing ideology over competence, and concentrating dangerous personalities in power. Warns this trajectory will produce technological and civilizational decline in Europe and praises the fact that elites are "idiots" while noting their capacity for harm.
My friends, good morning. Good morning from the United Kingdom. I've been, you know, ever since. I've felt a bit like an orphan ever since I stopped, ever since I decided to boycott French politics because, frankly, French politics has descended to the level of the gutter, right? That's where we are. These are amateurs, okay? It's a group of amateurs who are taking over this country.
Okay?
You know, I can analyze, observe, and judge regimes that I don't agree with. I can go back in time. I can judge Stalin's regime. I can talk about Mao's regime. I can talk about the North Korean regime. I can talk about Pol Pot. I can talk about a lot of people with whom I have no ideological proximity. But I can understand their logic. I can understand their agenda. The destruction that exists in France today is no longer a case of confusion. We are no longer in the situation of a dictator who made a mistake and was carried away by his ideology and caused destruction, which is not what he wanted. Personally, I believe that even Mao, when he caused the famine that killed 50 million of his fellow citizens, I don't think he did it on purpose. I don't think he woke up in the morning and said, I'm going to do it, okay? But still, he forced farmers to stop farming and start making steel.
Okay?
Because at one point he thought that heavy industry would make people free there. Well, that's not how it happened, okay? Today, what we have in France, but also what we have in Europe, is that most countries have destructive regimes. We have ideologies that say, I destroy, I break. And that's atrocious because it's already so hard to manage a country. It's even harder to manage a civilization, even when we don't want to, okay? You know, I'm full of goodwill, but if you give me a country to manage, I might kill 100 million people. I'll tell you, that's not what I wanted. Honestly, it's not really what I wanted. I really wanted the country to thrive. But, hey, that means even when you don't do it on purpose, you can cause a lot of damage. But when you do it on purpose, as CLU said, fish is so disgusting to eat, it makes you want to throw up. So today we have regimes that are committed to a logic of decivilization, of completely assumed civilizational destruction. It means, you know, it reminds me a little bit. I'll tell you something, it reminds me a little bit of those stories about, you know, sometimes we see young people who behave very badly, but they really Overdo it. They become caricatures, caricatures of thugs, caricatures of bullies. And in fact, at some point we realize that they have entered a kind of psychological universe where they want to distinguish themselves in the worst possible way. That is to say, I couldn't. I couldn't compete with others in terms of studies, performance, education, art, anything. So you know what? I'm going to become ugly. I'm going to become vulgar, I'm going to become brutal, I'm going to become aggressive. And then no one will surpass me in that area. It seems like some young people are falling into that. If you watch them today, we. We have that impression with Western regimes, like the French regime, for example. It seems like they're saying, to know what? The era of great achievements is over. And I don't want to distinguish myself with great achievements. I don't want to build or rebuild the Louvre. I don't want to build new TGV lines. I don't want another Concorde. I don't want another Ariane, I don't want Dabara, I don't want a new highway. I don't want that, okay? I don't want full employment. I don't want to solve the problems of the homeless. I don't want that. I'm not going to do that. On the other hand, I'm going to distinguish myself with destruction.
Okay?
Quote. And then they put on a kind of ideological thong, like 10 square centimeters of ideological lace, just to cover up their filthy background. And from there they embark on a logic of destruction. For example, I'm going to destroy agriculture. Why do I want to do that? Do it well, I do it because it's good for the planet. But in reality, he's just looking for a superficial justification, okay? In reality, even if he wants to develop agriculture, let's imagine that the plan to develop agriculture and take it to a place where we have happy farmers, where production is plentiful, where we can see our sovereignty, our food, independence and all that. Even if he were to aim for that kind of goal, he would be incapable of achieving it. He would even be incapable of approaching it. Even being incapable of doing it would only be the first step towards such a project. They will be incapable because they are mentally limited, because they are incompetent. They are idiots. You know, my friends, I'm telling you something. Don't believe it. Don't believe it. Sometimes, you know, stupidity. Stupidity alone can explain a lot of things. I think I watched a video by Piero San Giorgio. He Said, yes, you have trouble. Project yourself into the mental universe of someone who is 10 or 20 points ahead of you. I'll believe it. On the other hand, you must have a really hard time projecting yourself into the mental universe of someone who is half your intellectual capital. So when someone is really an idiot, and I really want to tell you something, don't necessarily associate success with intelligence. You can find idiots who progress because they are in a system that values people who are without faith or law. It's not a system that is based on intelligence. You have to know the system in which they evolve, what they base themselves on. Let me give you a funny story. I don't know many funny stories, but I know this one. One day, there was a guy who had stopped because his tire had a flat tire. He's driving his car at night. He gets a flat tire. Boom. He stops. He wants to change the tire, or rather the wheel. He breaks them. He puts them back up like this. He takes them out. He takes out the bolts.
He had.
He had five bolts. He takes them out, he puts them on the ground. He goes to find the emergency exit. He puts it in place, and then he gives it a blow with his knee. And all these. All these things, all these balls, bam. End up in the tastes. There's a taste. They go. They can't get them out.
Okay.
Ah, he's stuck there. What do I do? What do I do? He spent an hour or two. Oh, it's late. The garage is far away and everything. And he was in front of a mental asylum. He was parked where he broke down. It's in front of a mental asylum. There's a crazy guy looking at him from the bars like this. And then he says, sir, you. Yes. Can I give you some advice? Yes. He says, you know what? Take a nut off each of the remaining wheels.
Huh?
On each of the remaining tires. You'll have four in hand. You have three in hand. If you have one of each, put them on your wheel, and there you go. That'll allow you to drive home slowly. And then the next day, you'll be fine. Oh. Oh, wow. That's great. That's a good idea. So it was taken off like that. One of each was put on, tightened. Yes. Well, it still holds. I'm going to drive slowly and I'll get home. Then before leaving, she says to him, you know, you're in a mental hospital. I'm surprised someone as intelligent as you. You're locked up in a mental asylum. And then the madman answers him. He says, if you look at the sign, it's an insane asylum. It's not an asylum for idiots, okay? Just because I'm here doesn't mean I'm not intelligent. Okay, so we have to look at the criteria. What's the criteria? There's a sign, scientific study there. It's serious. A scientific study that says 1% of people, 1% of people are psychopaths. Really? 1% of the people around you are complete psychopaths.
Okay?
That means people who can crush you, who can walk all over you, who can. You can die in front of them. It won't bother them. If it can. If it can. Marquita, Sad I quote, if it can. And he said, if eating a candy. Okay, yes, yes. Wait, that's not how he said it. He said, if killing all of humanity gave me the same pleasure as eating a candy, I wouldn't hesitate to do it if it was within my means.
Okay?
So there are plenty of people. If your death could give them as much pleasure as eating a candy, they wouldn't hesitate to push it.
Okay?
1% of the population. Now, be careful with percentages, my friends. We are very quickly wary of percentages. That's a scientific study. The percentage is true. But be careful. There is a very important element. Every time you talk about a percentage that refers to a preponderance. Think about it. It's because there are situations that can change that percentage. There are situations that can increase this percentage simply through concentration phenomena.
Okay?
So when we have authoritarian systems, and to come back to the French system that I didn't want to talk about, when we have autocratic systems, authoritarian systems, rotten systems, it favors this 1%. That means that the 1% that the scientific study refers to actually corresponds to what you would have found if you took a general sample of the population. I mean, you go on a train or a bus or at the exit of a stadium. No, maybe not at the exit of a stadium, because at the exit of a stadium you don't have people who are there by chance. You have people who are all interested in football. But if you really take a sample or a very random population group that really is chosen at random, then you have 1%. But when you are in the machinery of power, okay, when you're really in the machinery of power, do you think that people are there by chance? Do you think they got there by chance?
Okay.
Do you think it's a random specimen?
Huh?
Look at Macron's face. Does he have the face of a random specimen? You know what I mean? No, not at all. Not at all. Look at the people around you. Do you get the impression that these are random specimens? The random specimen? Okay, well, it's varied. When you go and look for people at random, you're going to find people who are different.
Okay?
You've created a difference. Okay, If I take, I don't know, at home we have plastic balls like this. There are about a hundred. There are green ones, yellow ones, red ones. If I mix them up well, I take some at random, I'll get a dozen balls with different colors. If I get the same color. It's not possible. I did it by chance. I chose.
Okay.
Look at the people in the macronist regime today. Do you think they're there by chance? Not at all. It's not by chance because they all correspond to the same psychological profile. They all correspond to the same behavior, the same value scales. So what I'm trying to tell you is that when these people get promoted, they don't necessarily do so because of their intelligence. They can get promoted even though they might be mentally or have some really stupidity, but they get promoted because of other criteria, okay? Which have nothing to do with meritocratic performance, as you might imagine, if you come from an honest family. Okay, that's very important. So let me go back. I was saying that. I was trying to explain that these people aren't necessarily brilliant people. And I'm saying this as a positive thing. Let me give you an example. Look at the guy from Facebook, Facebook, who used to be called Meta, or rather who is now called Meta. Before Facebook. He came up with a completely crazy idea to create what he called the Metaverse. He said that one day people would wear a helmet like this on their head, and then they would lie down like this, and then maybe we'd feed them with a drip, I don't know. And then they would live in the metaverse. They would meet people, work, shop, chat, and have virtual children. Why not? Virtual children consume less carbon. And then he started selling helmets at a fairly high price, hoping that it would take off, that it would work. He even changed the name of his company. He called it Meta. He said it was the big future thing. It was the big future thing in the future. Okay, what happened? He lost billions, I think in one day. I think his company's value lost 230 billion. I have to check. Yeah, $230 billion. Was that in one day? Yes, I think it was in one day. After having delivered catastrophic results.
Okay.
Okay, where is this guy? He's the head of the group. Do you see what. Do you see what he's capable of doing? Look at the damage he does. Let's imagine Didi or Raymond. He drives a. He drives a bulldozer, for example. And then he starts off in the parking lot, reverses and crushes 12 cars. Or I didn't see them there. He would do less damage than the boss of Facebook, yet he would be fired by the police and tell you, you're sick, you're crazy. That's not possible. Look what you've done. But the boss of Facebook is capable of causing 230 billion damages. Later, we'll fire people. We'll figure it out, or we'll see how we can correct things after him. But since he's the sacred cow, he can leave his dung everywhere and that's it. And everything goes well. You know, we're not in danger with these people. You know, I'm telling you, when I tell you that these people are often morons, they're often cretins. I'm not telling you that in a note, with a note of despair, on the contrary, I'm telling you it's a good thing. I'm telling you it's good. I'm telling you it's great.
Okay?
I'm telling you, don't worry. Let's celebrate, my friends. Let's open the champagne. Let's celebrate. Okay, let's celebrate with champagne. Our enemy is an idiot.
Okay?
But hey, there's still no. It's still the case. The ability to cause harm, the ability to cause damage and all that. Okay, that's another thing. That's something else. But hey, my friends, I didn't want to talk about all that. I didn't want to talk about the French regime here. I'm going to tell you about another one. I've picked up a few newspapers from today, so I have times which talks about the United Kingdom should. Should. Should create a citizen army against Russia. A citizen army against Russia. Let me tell you a story. You know, someone told me. Well, I haven't checked it myself. It's very hard to check these things. But, you know, someone told me that in the time of Rome, in the time of Rome, the Roman Empire, when you see one dies, okay, there is one. There was towards the end of the empire, especially towards the end, they became so aggressive on taxation that if your neighbor dies and he hasn't paid the taxes, you become responsible for those taxes come knocking on your door and demanding that you pay. Okay, you can have a tax collector who comes and says, I want and demand that you pay your neighbor's taxes. If you have to. Sell your house, sell your crops, get by, sell your animals. I want you to pay your neighbors taxes, okay? See, the Roman state was so hated that when the vandals arrived, there was no one who wanted to fight. There you go. B is what he said to the vandal. What is it? Oh, you're coming. Listen, anyway, look, it's your turn. You do what you want. I'll fight anyway. Fight me for what? That's exactly where we are today. They want to raise an army to fight Russia. Yesterday there was a soldier who said, honestly, if we want to bring the majority of the British to a war front against Russia or anything else, we'd have to literally tie them up and take them on foot, point, hide, okay? He doesn't tell you. He doesn't tell you we're fighting. Why are we fighting? We're getting out of here, okay? We have worthless elites. We know that if we die, they're just going to make money off our backs and everything. They would be able to sell us out. They would be able to send us to fight against Russia and then sell us to the Russians, give us our positions. If they ever get money in Panama, okay, to spend it on food and drinks and all that, we know them. There's no one who believes in anything anymore, by the way. Let me tell you something. Look, I'm comparing the two newspapers. So here we're talking about a fiasco. Look at the two newspapers side by side. It's very interesting. So this newspaper talks about the Royal Mail. It's the British Post Office that is saying that they're probably going to stop. They're going to stop with Daily Mail. They're maybe going to start reducing budgets and everything. And then mail once every three times a week, okay? So that's a start. Three times a week, and then it will be once a week. And then one day it will be once a month. Then one day we'll say, you know what? One email is over, okay? Send a public service that is collapsing, okay? Because of poor management, bureaucracy, ideological spending, all that, okay? So we end up with no mail. We don't even have a post office, okay? We're going back centuries. Not even a post office that works. We have places where the trash is collected once every two weeks, once every three weeks. And every year the taxes increase. They increase your local taxes. And then they say, oh, yeah, we don't have any more police, we don't have any more public services. We're going to stop the bus. The mail doesn't come anymore, you know, and there you have it. So that's the mail that doesn't come, and that's. We need an army against Russia. Right. You see the priority. Okay, give me an idea of the priorities of the country. There you have it. Of these elites. Once the elites start to think about destroying the country. Because you're going to tell me, yeah, we don't care about the mail. Yes, but it's a sign of decivilization. It's not a temporary crisis. It's not like, yeah, there's a storm. The mail is disrupted. No, no. It means we're going to enter a phase where he'll come three times a week and then once a month, then maybe we'll stop him completely, since we've stopped a lot of things. Okay, we're going backwards, my friends. If you look at the great inventions, the great civilizational achievements, and everything that's happening in Europe is happening elsewhere. There'll come a day, you know. You know that movie where the guy gets hit on the head by a Coca Cola bottle? The Coca Cola bottle. There's a pilot. He throws a Coca Cola bottle, okay. And it falls on a guy. It falls on a guy. He's a primitive who was in his savannah, like that. He picks it up and then he's scared. He thinks that the gods sent him this bottle. And then he wants to throw it to the ends of the earth. He wants to reach the ends of the earth. He thought the earth was flat. So he's going to reach the end and throw it away. And then he goes on adventures like that, okay. In tribulations. Right. Uh, and then we're going to follow him through this film. And a rather likable character, by the way. And so if you want. What was I saying? Yeah. The thing is that the video from the beginning, when I press, I don't even know what I was going to talk about. Well, I had newspapers, uh, regulation. He gets the bottle on the head and all that. Yes, that's it. I wanted to tell you that we're going to end up in our latitudes with the same attitude towards the world that is developing as that primitive man who got the bottle of Coke on his head. That means one day we'll see inventions coming from China, coming from India, coming from elsewhere, coming from Brazil, and we'll be impressed by what they're capable of.
Okay?
That's where we're going. That's all. People will come to us. They they'll say, wow, that was pretty, huh? It was pretty. It's pretty because look, we've deteriorated in many ways. Look at Europe, for example. Look at the old castles. Do you think we're capable of doing the same thing in the arts? We've gone backwards in Europe. Europe has gone backwards in the professions. Do you agree with me? It's going backwards in everything else today. Going backwards in all the services, in public services, in quality of life, in all that. There you have it. Thank you, friends. I have a lot to tell you. I really do have a lot, but I'd rather stop there, otherwise I'd start a three hour video. I don't want to.
Okay?
There are still a lot of things boiling in my head. Sometimes there's nothing in my head, you know, Sometimes. Sometimes I want to turn off inside and I'm not thinking about anything, okay? And sometimes it's the opposite. Thank you, my friends. We'll see you in another video.
More from Aldo

La FIN du Royaume-Uni ? L'Ecosse, l'Irlande du Nord et le Pays de Galles veulent partir !

Analyse Présidentielles 2027 : Marine le Pen remet ENCORE le voile sur la table !

Scandale "60 Millions de Consommateurs" : la France mange des pâtes contaminées au Cadmium !

2 dossiers : Accident d'autogyre en Italie & un pilote sauvé par le parachute du Cirrus






