Mise à jour : Jegu air, Accident de Washington et disparition d’un avion en Alaska.

Good morning, my friends. As the Queen of England so graciously put it, it's a newsabilis. The year 2025 is starting off under very bad auspices. We had another tragedy today. A plane carrying about 10 people in Alaska has gone missing. It hasn't been found yet, but we're not under any illusions about the fate that the particularly appalling weather in this part of the world has reserved for it today. I'm here to provide updates. So the first update will be on the GJ Airlines, this Boeing 737,800 plane that crashed with absolutely appalling results in South Korea. Well, today we have a few more details. And in reality, the details that I'm going to give you will open up more questions than they will answer. So, first of all, this is something, something that was unfortunately planned. Remember the third video I made in the last video I made on the Zhou Airlines? I told you that when we find it, the black boxes probably won't be of much use because there won't be anything in them. Indeed, that has been confirmed. That is to say, at some point, the black boxes stop in the remaining four minutes of flight. Well, we don't have them. We never will. There is no cvr, which means there's no audio recording, and there's no dfdr. That means there is no data. They have just both stopped recording. Where was the plane when they stopped recording? What are the last recorded values? So the last recorded value is this. 500ft above ground level. 498ft above ground level. Okay, 500ft. And then we have a speed of about 160 knots. So we're on an aircraft that's on final, that's about to land. It's flaps down, it's on the axis. The Runway is huge like that in the window. It's going to land any moment. That's the last value. How long after does it crash? It crashes four minutes and seven seconds later. So here we still have a problem. That is to say, if both engines had stopped at 500ft, if both engines had stopped, also justifying the instantaneous shutdown of the CVR and dfdr, we would expect the aircraft to end up crashing within 30 seconds. An aircraft in landing configuration that suddenly loses its engines at 500ft, it's on the ground in 30 seconds. In that case, it still flew for four minutes. Where did the energy come from? What happened? We will never really know for sure because at the moment, what do we have? We have the burnt carcass audio Recordings of communications with the control tower, potentially witnesses, potentially surveillance cameras, the radar plot, and that's it. There's not much. So the investigators will try to piece together a story that most closely matches what I just told you. But unfortunately, there will always be questions. In any case, we found feathers in both engines, but there is no question of thinking that both engines stopped immediately on approach. That's not possible. If both engines had stopped suddenly, the plane would have ended up on the ground immediately. So what we can imagine at this stage is that the plane is approaching a flock of birds. Either they collide with it, or the pilots see that they are going to collide with it. They say to themselves, go around, we're going to avoid them. Put the throttle to full throttle. Tap, tap, tap. He hits the birds. And the engines, one or two engines, we'll see if we can. If we can see one day, are damaged and the plane continues to fly. But the engines are not destroyed. They are not stopped. They are just damaged. It flies for four minutes, it comes back later. And later, when it comes back to present itself, what do we see? We see an engine, the right engine, which is on. I'm not saying that it provides thrust, but I say that it is on because we see exhaust gases behind it, hot gases behind it. And the other engine, it is completely cold. It is off. Either it has completely failed or was stopped. So that's what I have to tell you at this stage. But there are a few elements that leave open questions. So perhaps one of the failures, the damage followed by failures a few minutes later, that means a damaged engine at first and then completely failing later, or a damaged engine that gradually fails and another one that shuts down by mistake. It can happen. I don't know if we'll ever have the answer. That's the first thing. Second thing. Washington. In Washington, there was a collision between a passenger plane and a military helicopter that was flying over the Potomac. So today some information came out. It seems that the helicopter was flying a little too high. That means if we look at the map of the region, we have a small pattern, a sort of line. A small line and 200ft. That means a ceiling of 200ft, means flying below 200ft. But the accident happened at 300ft. The plane was supposed to be at 300ft. No problem. Where was the helicopter? Well, if he hit the plane, it must have been at 300ft, too. What was he doing at 300ft? So today we're trying to understand the problem is that the radar stopped. It returned to within 100ft. You see, it's not very precise. When we see 300, it could be 250, it could be 260. It doesn't matter. There's a rounding that's done. So we're not too sure because we're talking about his feet. Trump spoke. He said that the helicopter was flying too high. Others were talking about it, it was his fault, and so on. Well, there's still a problem. I hope that since I've been telling you about this boarding story, you've realized the absurdity of the American side's argument. Take a good look at this one. We have a helicopter, right? A military helicopter, and we have an airliner. When there's an accident, you always have to think about the intention when you see people. For example, you know, I told you my grandmother worked, who spent her entire life as a nurse in an emergency department, and she told me when I was a child that no one planned to come to the emergency room. No one planned to end up in a hurry and come to the emergency room. Generally, they all have an explanation when they come. They have a plan. They had a plan. They had an idea. A brilliant idea, as we say in English. Hold my bee. Hold my glass. Keep it. I'll show you something. That's when the accident happens. So if we want to understand an accident, an accident is not something that was intended. We have to understand what was really wanted, what did we want to do and what did we get? So what we got was tragedy combined. But what did we want to get in reality? This. The helicopter arrives and then, like this, it's taking the buddy back to the maac. Okay, Right. And then the plane arrives like this. So what we want to get, huh? The mental plan of the air traffic controller. And you see the plane? Yes, I see it. No problem. Okay, continue. We wanted to get this. Do you see the thing? We wanted the helicopter to stay below 100ft so that the plane would drop to 300ft and it would pass. What do you think of that? Let's say there was no accident. Let's say there was no impact because that's how the story ended. But let's say there was no impact. Do you think it's normal to separate a helicopter and a passenger plane by 100ft? That's normal. That's normal practice, you see, that's not normal to begin with. Fundamentally, it's not normal. And all the people who are picked up and who are in the emergency department, when we ask them about their original plan, we realize that the plan was flawed. We realized that the plan already had everything on paper to end in tragedy. So we have instruments, radar, for example, that measure to the nearest 100ft. And then we want to create a separation of 100ft. That makes no sense. It makes absolutely no sense. That's serious. That's serious. So the controller, when he sees the helicopter coming, and he sees the plane coming on top of it, both going to the same point, he even has a conflict alert on his radar. He has an alert, it shows up in red. What does he say to himself? He says to himself in his head. And that gives you an idea. That gives you an idea of the practices of American air traffic control. Absolutely. Medieval practices in the Middle Ages were we didn't separate planes like that. That's what he says. He tells them, well, do you see it? Yes. Yes. Great. So keep going. That means he has a radar that measures to the nearest 100ft, and he has no problem separating these 2x100 feet. How can you do that? How can you separate them by 100ft if you have a radar that itself measures to the nearest 100ft, rounded to the nearest 100ft? And how can you even have a radar that measures to the nearest millimeter, but as long as your radar measures to the nearest millimeter, do you think it's normal for a plane with a wingspan of 23 meters to be separated by about 30 meters from a helicopter flying right below? Is that normal? Do you know what I mean? That's crazy. And so he had this plan. So the air traffic controller's mental plan was to have them pass like this, 100ft apart. In reality, since the helicopter flew a little too much, it ended up like this. Okay, that's the idea. So here we see that this is not exactly what should have been done normally. We have this controller, he looks at his radar. He sees that these two aircraft are going to arrive at the same place with minimal separation. We don't even think about the impact. We think that we are on the radar and we see where the helicopter is arriving, the plane is arriving too, and that even if the plane is at 300 or 250ft, this one respects, putting this one Respects There are 200ft. We say to ourselves, no, there is an unacceptable loss of separation. And at that point, what do we do? We contact the plane right away. We say, go around immediately, and we contact the licensee, telling him, confirm that you are below 200ft. You have a plane that is going around right above your Head. Do you see how long it took? What I just said? Five seconds. Okay? The plane goes around right away, and boom. And they go like this. Okay, There. The air traffic controller had this plan to separate them by a hair. And unfortunately, it didn't go through. They hit. That's all. That's it. Every time you want to do something weird like this, well, of course it can go wrong or break down. So to be precise. Well, it didn't go wrong. Okay, That's a really big problem. That shows that the original intention was to have young people do this. And we wonder, are they used to doing this? They did this. They did this regularly. I won't hide it from you. When I was in Washington, I didn't arrive in Washington at the base. How did I arrive in Washington? I arrived by car at the base. I arrived in the United States, in New York. I arrived in New York and I booked a bus to go to Washington. The bus was canceled at the last minute. They contacted me to say, sorry, it's canceled. They canceled it 30 minutes before departure. And I didn't want to take an American regional company. I have zero confidence in them. I took an Uber. I called an Uber for an address 300 meters away. And when the guy came, I said, listen, do you want to go to Washington? How much is it? Quite a. We talked. We agreed on the price, and he said, okay, I'll cancel the ride and we'll go to Washington. Here we go. Cash. We left for Washington. Just to let you know, it took 3.5 hours on the road, but you can't trust these people. Last, last piece of information. We have the NTSB investigation on the ground for the Philadelphia crash, because here we have another Philadelphia. Remember that ambulance plane that crashed, six people on board. And we know today that there was one death on the ground. There were several people who were injured on the ground, including one person who unfortunately lost their life. So that's seven deaths for a plane that crashed in 30 seconds. So I think, if you like, that, it took off with a problem. It's not a problem that manifested itself at some point during the flight because the flight lasted 30 seconds in total. I'm not very close to the idea of spatial disorientation, even though it's possible. I'm not saying that this theory has no merit. It's possible. But since the flight only lasted 30 seconds, I'm not sure there's time to take off, enter the clouds, hesitate a little bit about turning left or right, lose control, and do this kind of Exit? I don't think so. The time allotted for this scenario seems extremely short to me. I'm closer to an idea of a takeoff with a problem. So, a problem? For example, the controls blocked by a system by a Ghost lock type device that unfortunately wasn't checked. It's happened before. Huh? It's happened before. We had a case. Huh? Look for it a little bit in this channel. The death of him 4. The one that this billionaire who was traveling on a private jet. And then what did the pilots do? They forgot the ghost locks. And there are people who tell me it's not possible for a pilot to forget the ghost locks. My friends, I can tell you something. If these things weren't possible, we wouldn't even have this channel. It wouldn't even have existed. All the horrors that I'm telling you about this channel wouldn't have existed if things were going normally. Except that we're in this mess because things aren't going normally. That's the story in reality. That's the problem is that things. Lots of impossible things still happen. As in the case of the four. The two pilots didn't check the control travel. They took off. They flew the plane with a little crank, you know, there's a little wheel there on the left on the captain's side. He flew the plane on the ground with that. And then once he had it aligned, he put the throttle on. He put his hands and fingers on the controls on the stick. And then what happened? He waited. There you go. The plane started to accelerate. V1. Okay, great. V1. I'm taking my hand off the throttle. Okay, rotate. Now, the moment he pulls, he sees that it's blocked. It was the first time he'd touched the controls since he set foot in the cockpit. These things happen. Some people say, yes, there are two of them. It can't happen. Yes, but even there are two of them, it can happen. Of course there are two of them. It can happen. We've had cases where there are two of them. They forgot to put the flaps down. No, there are two of them. They forgot there are two of them. They hit a mountain. There are two of them. They had the wrong engine. There are two of them. They had. Yeah, of course. Yes, of course, my friends. There are two of them. They brought the plane down. I mean, I don't need to prove that these things happen, because they do. Unfortunately, I'm the narrator of why. I'm trying to explain why. I'm not trying to demonstrate that it happens. I mean, because now we're behind it. I mean, the accident is behind us. The tragedy is behind us. We don't need to prove that it happened. There you go. So it could also potentially be. Potentially. If it's not that, it could be, for example, maintenance saying that the plane arrived in. In the afternoon, he parked and then during the flight they arrived for the positioning flight. They had a problem, like an alarm, a noise, something strange, a mechanic intervened. That's it. And then an error. Huh? An error on something that wasn't seen. There you go. We also saw in this channel an airplane that had come out of maintenance. Well, not one. Several that had come out of maintenance and then that crashed. Honestly, today, personally, as a passenger, I would rather get on a plane that is going to be serviced than a plane that has just come out of maintenance. All things being equal, of course. There you have it, my friends. Thank you for watching this video so far. Thank you. To those who continue to support the channel on Patreon, it's thanks to you that this channel exists and I'll see you in a future video. Sam.