Nicolas Sarkozy en prison. Qui sera le suivant ?

Good morning, my friends. On this channel, you would have a hard time, even if you looked closely, finding a positive word about Nicolas Sarkozy, his presidency, his record, and so on. On the contrary, there is a lot of criticism. In fact, one of my latest books, the Great Betrayals, has two chapters. The chapter on the Lisbon Treaty, right? A referendum that was not respected by France and which was not respected by many countries which were forced to vote and vote again until the desired effect was achieved. Right? So I think we now know what the European Union is made of. There you have it. And then there is another chapter, the one on the sale of French gold. As part of the Washington agreement, many European countries were locked in a room in Washington with Alan Greenspan, the head of the Fed at the time, and other senior U.S. treasury officials, and they were forced to sign an agreement to manage the sale of their gold. People don't want to understand that since 1945, European countries have been under American supervision. And that's why they simply have to be organized into the European Union. It simplifies the bureaucracy across the Atlantic. That's all. There you have it. Now, Nicolas Sarkozy has been tried and convicted. Why? So there are a lot of charges, right? I'll tell you something before we continue. I know that the majority of people in my audience are against Nicolas Sarkozy. So if I want to have an easy day, a pleasant day, all I have to do is come here, throw a lot of stuff at him, and. And frankly, I assure you, it's super easy. I assure you that I can launch intellectual missiles. I launch five or six, I go home, people will come and applaud. Aldoser1, you are brilliant because you think exactly like me. So now I would like to tell you something. I am for. I like victory, but I still like victories that have decor, that have dignity. And I am not completely sure that what is happening with Sarkozy is a victory. Let me tell you. Sarkozy was convicted of criminal conspiracy, for which he will go to prison. Criminal conspiracy always has a goal. It is wrongdoing. It is committing a crime in a group. Right now, the criminal conspiracy was to embezzle public money, and it was to receive money from corruption. The problem is that the money from corruption, well, he was acquitted of corruption. There is no proof. We have statements, we have speculations, we have people who say that, right? But if you take a president, whoever he is, even ghoul, you can always find people who will say things, who will speculate things. But between saying it and proving it there again, there is a long way to go. The accusations have not been proven. So we also have the other chief who was embezzlement of public funds. There is no embezzlement of public funds, according to the courts, and he was acquitted on this charge. So we are in the process of convicting him of criminal conspiracy, but the crime is not proven. It is a bit like Jill and Maxwell, who is finally convicted of having trafficked young people and all that towards versus well, just like that, there is nothing left to say. So we have this conviction, this sentence that is suspended in the void. There is nothing around it. And when there is nothing around it, well, it is a conviction. We must not be fooled. It is a political type of conviction. Here we have to read things as they are. When we look at Phion's career, when we look at Sarkozy's career, clearly we are in a form of political persecution. Because in France, huh, those who follow the chronicle, the justice, the winter thread, all that, you know very well that every day we sometimes have crimes, crimes where people, innocent victims, lose their lives because justice has shown banality, you know, towards criminals who had already demonstrated what they were capable of. So in France, we do not imprison people just like that. And Sarkozy will go to prison, which proves that there is still a certain weight of measure. So, of course, there are people who will say in the comments, I see the one here. Yes, but there you have it. He called some people, Raqqa. He wanted to clean up the housing projects with a Karcher. He did this. He did that. Immigration, Libyan lockdown. Yes, yes, I hear all that. I hear all that, and I've talked about it regularly in my videos. Now, there's one thing, he wasn't prosecuted for that. Well, yes, and yes, that means that everything you mentioned, Lisbon, the French, all that are not in the charges, it didn't come before the courts. So if he had been taken to court for that, we would have talked about it again. Of course. But in this specific case, no, that's not the case. What does that mean? It means that we're looking at how it works. We condemn him, okay? We condemn him. And then everyone will find reasons, okay? Everyone will find reasons. Uh, everyone will read into this condemnation, what they want, right? And many people are happy to say, well, there you go. For such and such a reason. Except that that is not justice. That is lynching. That is, if we take someone, we release them to mob justice, right? Everyone comes. Everyone comes to beat them up. And then well, in the end, everyone knows why. It is not that we know that they embody something bad. Well, we release the public on it and then people, well, they will find it, right? And everyone will have their explanation. Everyone will have a reason why they will think that this is right, what is happening. Okay? And that is the very definition of mob justice. It's not justice because once again, he wasn't prosecuted for the gold, he wasn't prosecuted for the ispa, he wasn't prosecuted for the karcher, he wasn't prosecuted for all that. Okay? And so here we have to be very careful. So what's the underlying message today? In short, it's that the French justice system can be used to arrest men, potentially women, politicians. I think that for example, Marine Le Pen, who very opportunely convicted, didn't she us are cozy. I think that she also lives in the shadow of bars, huh? It's that she could potentially find herself arrested tomorrow. Let's imagine it's the eve of the presidential elections, or she's the Eve. We understand each other, right? Three days before. And then at some point, uh, there's a warrant of arrest, it becomes enforceable. She has to go to handcuffs, Al Jazeera, cnn, bfmtv, whatever. And then, well, she goes to jail. There you go, it's over. Okay? That's what we're doing, that's what we're preparing. So we have to be very careful. We shouldn't, we shouldn't say we have to be a chess player. Chess is not played on failure. It's not lost and it's not won on the next move. Right? It's a very long game. It's a very long game where each move has a meaning. Sometimes it has a visible meaning, sometimes it has a hidden meaning. And precisely the story of Sakozy's story. And on a personal level, honestly, on a personal level, seeing this 70 year old man running around the courts for years now, I think it's becoming defining in his life. I mean, he's run around the courts more than he's been president. I mean, he's spent more time in the latter activity than in the former. Right. So it's true that somewhere deep down inside me there's something. There's no more anger, there's nothing left. He's just an old man who's being tormented. I mean, I want to say, let him go, let him go. It's over. That's fine. That's fine. Yes, I agree with everything else, but let the horse piss off Let him go. Let him go. It's about the dignity of justice, the. The dignity of the presidential office. I mean, that's where I'm at. So. And also something that bothers me is that. And I understand. I understand them. There are a lot of French people who are very happy. I've seen on social media, you know, a lot of French people are very happy. And besides, this video goes against the grain, you know, the general perception. And they're happy. And what saddens me is that today they've reached a stage where they just want revenge. They just want to give us someone. Well, we're throwing Sarkozy at them, that's all. But you see how life is turning around. There's a life lesson for all of us, right? Honestly, it's not beyond Sarkozy, beyond all that, there's still a life lesson. Look at how treacherous power is. Did you see how it worked at the time? Sarkozy. Patrick Poivre, Darver, ppda was somewhat untouchable. He did the APM news and everything. Well, he said he had a comment when he received the first interview with Sarkozy. He said something like, yes, you were like a kid or like a child and all that. The other guy felt belittled. The PPDA guy jumped. And since then, there's this tradition where every president brings his journalists with him. Right. You know what I mean? Every president brings him with him in his suitcase. And you'll see that the next election will change too. So you see how he was really idolized. The media were at his knees and all that, right? And then today, well, it's the same people who were at his knees yesterday who are now shooting at Boulet Rouge. Right? That tells you a lot about human nature. I mean, yeah, it's sad. There you go. So honestly, honestly, I know you. You know my activism, you know my positions. We've been seeing each other for years, right? But I can tell you, I have my limits. I have my limits. Among those limits, someone between 70 and 80 years old. I mean, when they reach that age range. I'm not the manager of justice. It's not really my thing. I think we have other projects. We have much more harmful people right now. And I think it would be more urgent to take care of them than to run after this shadow theater. There you go. Thank you, my friends, for listening so far. I'm sorry for those who were waiting, like, okay, here it is. Do me a favor and attack Sarkozy. But no, my friends, I think we're going to try to win, but win with dignity. Very, very British stuff. That's it. See you soon.