A 2014 YouTube monologue exploring why people from many nationalities travel to fight in Syria. The speaker contrasts Western notions of war (domination and eventual cessation) with Islamist/Islamist-extremist wars (extermination or forced conversion), links fighters' motives to identity crises and supranational Islamism/globalism, critiques Islamist ideology as retrograde-conservative and economically ultra-liberal, and warns of spreading violence in Europe.
Everyone. So, you know, I don't have the slightest desire to make this video. I don't know why I want to do something else. Instead of making this video. I almost want to grab an Adidas tote, bag some currency, and then get the hell out of here. That's really what I want to do. That's what's deep inside me. But I'm making a video. It's a kind of compensation for not getting the hell out of here. So there are people who write to me and ask me, why are the Arab wars so dirty? Why, for example, in Syria, no matter who's right or wrong, why this vicious and deliberate attack on civilians? So let me explain something to you, my friends. War is usually in the minds of Westerners because I think that many Westerners who watch me and there is something they do not understand because it is not part of their mental universe. That is to say, when Westerners go to war, it is to dominate you. If tomorrow, for example, France were to attack Spain, the Spanish would defend themselves. Then, for example, if the Spanish decided to admit their defeat and raise the white flags, I imagine that hostilities would cease and the French would be happy to have dominated them. It's a little bit like that. It's a little bit like the Western mindset, you understand? It's like the Americans, they go to Iraq, they go to Bart, all that. Well, there are always the exactions that can go with it or other things. Civilians always pay a heavy price. Let's not get it wrong. But in the end, I mean, once the whole thing is over, he gives the kids chewing gum, you understand? That's not what war is. It's not an Islamist war. Islamist war is for you. It's to exterminate you. It's a war of extermination. That means that if the guy is an extremist, well, he's going to exterminate you. So he's going to physically kill you, he's going to liquidate you. And then if the guy is moderate, well, he's going to convert you. That means that there's also a form of extermination, because you understand that exterminating or converting calls for exactly the same reflex. I don't want the other person. I want to destroy them. So either I kill them or I make them like me. But in any case, there's no other. By the way, you will notice that in the Arab Muslim nation there are a lot of marriages between cousins which are called incestuous marriages in the Western world. Why has incestuous marriage always been forbidden. It is because it is an obligation. Because incestuous marriage means marrying someone who is identical, when in fact we are forced to go towards something different. Otherwise we pay a heavy price. Even nature wants us to go towards something different. Whereas the Islamist spirit, if you will, is an extremely narcissistic spirit. He is open to massacres, he is open to killings, he is open to forced conversions. And in the same spirit, in the same open spirit to marriage, to cossing marriage, which I think explains a large part, I think, of the problems of the Arab Muslim nation today. There is another question that often comes up, which is why people leave France or England or elsewhere. They go to Belgium and they go to war, they go to war in Syria. You have to know one thing. It is that if, for example, a guy is French, it does not mean that he feels French. I am Algerian and I feel Algerian. It means that if, for example, there is a war involving my country, I can take a stand and why not participate? Okay? Because it is my country. So. So I feel directly affected. Ah, all the more so since I am a nationalist. So it's true that if someone attacks my country, I'm going to feel like I should intervene. On the other hand, why, for example, would a French person go and fight in Syria? We don't care. We're beyond the concept of good and evil. We're not trying to figure out who's right and who's wrong. It's just about why a French person would go and fight a war. Even if that war were just why would he go and fight that war in Syria? The explanation is that this guy doesn't feel French. In fact, at the moment, when what's happening today is like nation states are weakening, are completely deluding. So what's happening? There are other supranational entities that give a very strong identity to a certain number of people. So let me explain. The Algerian who goes to fight in Syria is not Algerian any more than the Frenchman who goes to fight in Syria. They are not French at all, strictly speaking. He has papers, he has a French passport that allows him to travel to get to the crime scene more quickly. That's all. So what you need to know is that Islamism is a form of globalism. That's very important. Ah. There are 83 nationalities in Syria today who have landed in Syria to fight, to fight in a country that is not theirs. Where they are, whose borders they have violated, whose authorities they are attacking for reasons they themselves do not even understand. Okay, 83 nationalities that proves to you that these people do not feel that they belong to these nationalities. These are people who feel they belong to Islamism, to a sort of virtual caliphate that they have in their heads and to which they are attached. So this caliphate is a sort of supranational caliphate. So necessarily, necessarily globalist, this means that the guys would be ready to take up arms even against their own country. For example, the Algerians who have this mentality are ready to take up arms against the Algerian authorities, and the Algerian people with terrorists from all over the world, if the market were given to them. In the same way, these pseudo French people who will fight in series, whether they are converts or people from immigrant backgrounds, it's the same. They don't feel French at all. If ever there was an attack against France, they would be immediately ready. So in fact, Islamism, if you like, is a form of globalism. It's also neoconservatism. In fact, it's more than neo conservatism. It means that conservatives are in favor of a certain established order that they reject, as well as modernization or openness to the future. The Islamists, for reasons I'll explain in another video, are a conservative system, but one that is very open to anything that is retrograde. The further back you can go, the happier they are. So this system is a sort of no return system. I go backwards, but I never go forwards. For example, little girls in Indonesia narrowly escaped a law that the system is trying to pass. It involves going to the gynecologist to check if the little girls who go to school are virgins, checking them year after year to see if they are virgins, and kicking them out of school if they are not. Okay, you see the screw of this kind of person. The deeper they get into perversity, the happier they are. Incidentally, that's why they get along with a certain number of your elites, because they have the same sensibilities on many things. Also, economically speaking, it's an ultra, ultra liberal system. Many people get involved in thinking that Islamism is a system, let's say of the left. But in fact, no, it's an absolutely ultra liberal system. So when I say ultra liberal, globalist, neo conservative, you can easily understand why this system gets along very well with the political and financial elites who run the United States, because they too are the same, have the same persuasion or the same inspiration. There you have it. In any case, in any case, what's going to happen is that what's going to happen? But it's. It's guaranteed, I can, I can guarantee it to you on invoice is that sooner or later the rat will fall in France, it will fall in your country, it will fall in Europe, it will fall in Belgium, in Switzerland. You don't know where it might fall. And at that point, you have dozens of nationalities arriving from everywhere and it's going to turn into a bloodbath because it never fails. It's a mechanism that has happened every time in history and that many people have been denouncing online for years. I myself have been denouncing it for years. But what do you expect? We see the nullables coming. It's like a kind of slow motion accident. It's a slow motion tragedy that we see happening, but there's not much we can do, really. It looks like the train is moving and then it's going to hit the wall. And then we just have to watch it. There you go. We just have to watch the disaster unfold in slow motion and that's it. The day it happens, we'll comment on it, that's for sure. If we're still here. But sometimes, you know, I wonder if all this makes sense. Mister.
