Speaker introduces the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (cites it as a 2006–2007 declaration signed by 144 countries) and highlights Article 8 protecting indigenous peoples from forced assimilation. The speaker then describes a recent incident in England where a rural school was declared 'too white', frames that as reverse racism promoted by leftist ideology, and criticizes contemporary public shaming practices (celebrities publicly self-punishing) as psychologically harmful and authoritarian. Tone is polemical and critical of left-wing politics.
Hello, everyone. So this week, while randomly searching the Internet, I came across this very interesting document. It's the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. I'll give you the link, the complete PDF of this declaration. In the description of this video, it's important to know that this is a relatively recent declaration. It dates from 2006, 2007, and has been signed by 144 countries in which it has the force of law. The most interesting article is Article 8. Indigenous peoples have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture. Also in the same article, we find that states must set up effective prevention and reparation mechanisms to avoid any form of forced assimilation or integration. So that means that we don't have the right to force indigenous peoples, those who have been on a land for a very long time, we do not have the right to force them to integrate or assimilate with other peoples who have been present on this same land for a shorter time. And this has been recognized by the international community as being completely fair and reasonable. Why am I telling you about this? Because there was a very interesting incident this week in England. In fact, there was a school, a rural school, that was declared by the authorities to be too white. So you can imagine the uproar if a school had been declared too black, for example, or had been declared too Indian or too Pakistani. It is important to know that in England we have schools where 98% or even all of the children do not speak English as their mother tongue, but speak other languages. And so the system has nothing to complain about. This means that for the system, ideally, what is the ideal mix? Well, ideally there should be no white people at all. Ideally, there should be 100% of other people from other races, but no white people at all. I find that to be an absolutely extraordinary form of racism. Because as much as we can speak out against racism when it affects black people, yellow people and others, when I see that little children, like little children and their families have been treated just because these children are white, it is something that I find completely appalling. And what's more, the system here in France, and you are not far from that, finds that racism against this kind of person, against young white children, who is completely correct, fair, even desirable and encouraged. So I would like to tell you something extraordinary, which is that Pakistanis here, or Indians or blacks or others would never dare, it would never occur to them to say that a school is too white. Okay? No, it's. It wasn't a school where there were Indians who said that this rural school wasn't white enough? No, it was hoodlums. You know, the left has this ability to create hoodlums. You only have to look at recent history. You only have to look at what the left has managed to produce over the last 50 or 60 years. And people claim it without embarrassment or shame. Even now, the left said they managed to produce hoods because today, England, you have to see it, the United States, they are the same. You have to see them today as utopian paradises. Leftists, communists, socialists, where this kind of twisted mindset is leading the dance and is trying to shape, to play God a little and to try to shape society by making, by introducing societal rules, by wanting to completely reverse things that have been there for thousands of years. Do you understand? That's the problem with the E. Gaddis. It's that once you let them come to power, they cause extremely deep damage to society. And centuries later, you can see the impact of this damage. They go deep, the bastards, you understand? They go deep. It's not that they don't do superficial things. They seek to undermine the deepest foundations of society. They want to be remembered for their time there. Usually even when people open their eyes, they realize that they made the wrong choice. Well, it's still too late. Because no matter how much you chase these hoodlums, these communists from power, the damage they've done is still there. It's very difficult to repair. So in fact, the parents were, I was saying, treated with contempt. The parents of these children were literally treated like, I don't know, like white bastards. That's the word. And they themselves described the treatment as patronizing. So patronizing in English is when you treat someone with contempt, you treat someone like a subordinate. Imagine a bad boss treating a subordinate in a way that puts him down. And in fact, they were degraded and forced to pay 35 pounds for their children to go and visit so called diversity schools. And in fact, they didn't really have a choice. I can tell you that if they hadn't paid, if a family had refused to pay, they could have had their child excluded from school. They could have even risk losing custody of their children or ending up with social services at home. This kind of thing is extremely, extremely serious here. So the system, to give you a glimpse of the system here, which I rarely talk about and for good reason, you know, if I lived in North Korea, I made videos, I would avoid being witty about the Kim family, for example. So I was saying that here we have reached a level of repression on these things. That is absolutely astounding. Ah, we all know this image. For example, in an episode where someone criticized the party or criticized the revolution or the state or whatever, there were people who would come at 3am to knock on his door and then make him disappear or throw him in prison or whatever. And if they don't even do you the honor of throwing you in prison to come at 3am because at least that would be clear. That would be obvious. In fact, here, people have to punish themselves. People flog themselves. That means it's as if the day Jesus Christ was crucified, instead of putting him on the cross, they gave him the nails, the hammer, the cross, and then he would have been on the cross and would have been nailed to the cross and screaming that he deserved. That's it. That's how it happens here. Uh, let me give you an example. Not a week goes by without a celebrity, for example, because celebrities are great. They allow you to spread a message to the masses because everyone is watching. It's easy to make examples of them. Not a week goes by without a celebrity using a word or making remarks that may seem racist or, or even slightly racist. And in fact, this person comes and flogs themselves in public, slaps themselves in the media, on television, etc. And in fact, that's absolutely traumatizing for the population, because imagine if you lived in Rome, and instead of someone being whipped on the ground in the marketplace, imagine if they came and whipped themselves to death. I mean, the psychological impact on the population is much stronger.
