A single-speaker YouTube monologue (May 26, 2014) in which an Algerian-origin speaker explains why he personally would vote for the French National Front. He argues the party’s non‑interventionist, nationalist stance opposed French-backed interventions (citing Libya and Syria) and thus protects national sovereignty. The speaker also critiques the French political establishment (left and right) for supporting foreign interventions, addresses racism and Islamophobia, and urges immigrant communities to present a more 'respectable' image to reduce social exclusion and hostility. The piece mixes historical claims, moral arguments, and hypothetical scenarios to warn of possible violent backlash if current policies continue.
Hello, everyone. So yesterday the National Front achieved very interesting results in the elections. And it's happening that a lot of people, especially of foreign origin, are panicking and wondering what I'm going to get, what's going to happen, how I'm supposed to understand this result. So first of all, I'm going to tell you something. Given the situation, we're not going to beat around the bush. So I'm going to get straight to the point. If I had been French, if I had been French today, I would have voted for the National Front without the slightest hesitation. Now, a French person can perhaps understand voting for the National Front. Now we might be less able to understand an Algerian like me who speaks in favor of the National Front. I'll tell you why. I'm going to give you my reasons. And I think that some French people of foreign origin or immigrants in France could perhaps find some inspiration in these reasons. I'll give you one point, an absolutely key point for which I support the National Front without the slightest hesitation. I'll tell you why. When the Republican right was in power in France, Libya was attacked by terrorist dogs who landed from all over the world. There was the classic march of mercenary nationalities who came from all over the world, massacring the population, destroying public property, roads, bridges and so on. And with the support of the French air force, they managed to kill the official and legal president there. And then they installed a group of terrorists who now run the country that was the right. And then what happened? Sarkozy had even been there to celebrate the victory of these people. The images are still online. Then the same scenario was repeated in Syria. But in Syria, since they failed to achieve their goal of overthrowing the government. What's happening? They're attacking the population. And Syrians are being massacred by terrorists of 80 nationalities. In the meantime, the French government, which is currently left wing, is playing the role of sales representative and providing political, financial and military support to the terrorists who are on the ground raping, pillaging, crucifying, burning and destroying. If you look at some of the images in the series, there are certain areas of this country which is one of the oldest countries in the world. Well, it looks like a lunar landscape, almost lunar. There was even last year, if you remember, there were even children who were gassed by terrorists. And everyone was clear from the start that it was a terrorist act. And the French left wing establishment, even the right wing establishment, immediately used these images to advance their agenda, showing through this manipulative action that for them, gassing children move on I'm moving. It has no value.
Okay.
So I'm going to ask you a very simple question. I'm going to ask you a very simple question. If one day we decide to move from Syria to another country that has not yet been affected by a spring, Algeria, for example, if we decide to send Chechens, sick people from England, France, South Africa, from all the Sikh countries, if we decide to send them to massacre people in Orang, Algiers, Constantine, what do you think the French Republican establishment, the left or the Right, will say? What will they say? Well, they will say that these monsters are freedom fighters and they will send them weapons, they will finance them while they are beheading your families, who will be beheading your mothers, your sisters and your fathers in Algeria? There you have it. It is very clear. It is obvious. If you have not understood that, take some magnesium, okay? The only party that opposed this, the only major party that opposed this was the Frank National. And I believe they are sincere on this issue. Why? Because it is a nationalist party that respects its nation and also respects other nations. So it is not a party. It is neither an interventionist party nor a party that has an excessive interest in foreign policies or shenanigans. Because these are parties that are focused on their nation. By definition, these are people who are focused on what is happening in the French Republic. So it is, let's say, essential for us that France is a party like the National Front in power. It is an existential question for us. If you do not understand that, then your state is desperate. Really? That was the first point. Second point, regarding racism. There was even an Algerian newspaper. I saw this on F. D', Souch, an Algerian newspaper that gave voting instructions to French people of Maghrebi origin. Honestly, they should have kept their mouths shut. Because if we Algerians had given voting instructions in our recent elections, I think we would have cried out. I don't know. We would have cried out. Let me give you a very simple example. If I take Republican parties like the PS or the ump, for example, I'll go back a bit. I'll give you a number of very simple sources of inspiration. But I like them because they're very powerful, a very powerful image. Jules Ferry was the French Prime Minister. He was a member of Parliament. He was a lot of different people. He was Minister of Education, Minister of many things, and he was a guy who was very. He was a very important guy for the Republican Right and Left. By the way, you only have to look at how many high schools today bear his name. There's not a single academy that doesn't have several high schools named after Lyse Jalfuri. You just have to find the speech in the description of this video. He said clearly he supported, but very openly, that the superior races have a duty to civilize among the inferior races. So you have to know that the inferior races are us. So officially, I am from an inferior race. So in our Algerian sensibility, I think that these stories of colonialism are still. We have always been taught that colonialism was absolute evil. So today we are asked to vote for parties that are intrinsically colonialist, that are intrinsically racist. There you have it. And I cannot understand that because it is a huge contradiction in the discourse. Another question is Islamophobia. So they are afraid of Islam. So we must not represent people who are afraid of Islam. So first of all, people are not afraid of Islam. People are afraid of Muslims. And why are they afraid of Muslims? They are afraid of Muslims for the same reasons that we are afraid and flee our own countries. Why do you think we leave our countries? Well, for them. We leave them because of the problems that you know very well, which are being exposed today. Because Muslims are going everywhere. And today these problems are not just in our countries, but are spreading to the whole world. What does it mean? It's very simple. What does a Muslim neighborhood mean today? If I asked you to go to France or Belgium or Canada or anywhere and go to a Muslim neighborhood, what would that inspire in you? A Muslim neighborhood inspires violence. These are neighborhoods where there is no security. Your personal safety is not guaranteed. These are neighborhoods where there is poverty, where there is trafficking, there are all the social problems. All the social problems. That's what disgusts people. In fact, it's not even a phobia, it's a disgust. I mean, there you go. So if we don't want people to be phobic, we're not going to put them all in a psychiatric rehabilitation center like the ussr. Instead, we're going to have to change. We're going to have to change. We're going to have to present a respectable image. The day we present a respectable image, people will respect us. There won't be any question of phobia. For the moment, we present an unworthy image, an image that even we ourselves find repulsive.
Okay?
And people have seen that. That's all. You can't blame them. You can't accuse them of having the same feelings as us.
Okay?
There you go. That's not it. And I told you, I tell you all the time. If we want there to be respect, we have to understand that what hurts us hurts others, and vice versa. Uh, we can't ask people to accept things that we don't accept in ourselves. I'm asking you. I'm just giving you a very simple scenario. Let's imagine that in Algeria, we start distributing passports to Chinese people who don't have the same religion as us, who don't have the same culture as us, who don't have the same civilizational references as us. But we start distributing passports to them, and we ask you to recognize them as full Algerians. Are you going to recognize them as full Algerians? I probably don't know you. And then let's imagine that the Chinese work. Well, the Chinese are workers. Our bridges, our roads, all that our buildings were built by the Chinese. But anyway, let's move on. Let's imagine that the Africans who arrive in Algeria today, let's imagine that we create laws to force the Algerian state to house them. And let's imagine that the Algerian state starts to house them as a priority over Algerians who are in poverty.
Okay?
Imagine that he goes into neighborhoods and that in these neighborhoods, the native Algerians would be unacceptable. The native Algerians would have to walk with their heads down or preferably not come at all because they would throw stones at them and so on. How would you take it in Algeria? Do you see what I mean? If it hurts us here, if we don't accept it here, we can't reasonably ask other people to accept the same thing. That's all. It's very simple. It's basic justice. There you have it. I think we have to fight for what's right, because when we fight for injustice, well, we'll get backlash one day. The backlash we could get is that we'll end up with 80 different nationalities massacring us, and we'll end up with parties in France that are financing them and helping them politically. That's the kind of backlash you can get from acting like idiots like that. Anyway, I hope it helps some people understand what it's all about. See you soon.
