Revue de Presse : Front National, Corée du Nord, Terrorisme à Londres, Saint-Martin…

Guy you just have to see who's criticized by the Western press. And when the Western press calls someone a butcher, it's usually because he's a good guy. You can already hope for that. Ah, what was I saying? If North Korea had been an Arab or Muslim country, do you know what they would have done if they had been accused on the basis of an asylum seeker of having weapons of mass destruction? They would have invited inspectors or international commissioners to come and check. Search their hangars, search their barracks, search their buildings, their basements, go through France, and it is called the Khalid IBN Waleed school. Khalid IBN Walid, if you like. How can I tell you? How can I tell you if you want a shortcut? If you want a shortcut, I mean, a cookie cutter formula, give me a Godin point right away. Like, if a Frenchman created a school, he called it Adolf Hitler's school, okay? Er, Goebbels or whatever you want, it's at that level. But if someone creates a school, he calls it Adolf Hitler school and then puts the Nazi flag on it, everyone will recognize that code. That code is known. Now, when someone creates a school, he calls it Willied. It's clear that the average Frenchman, well, he's ready maybe even to take €10 out of his pocket and give it, okay? But it's very serious, really serious. Because as much as Adolf Hitler died in 1940, on April 30th, uh, as much as Mr. Khalid Ibn Walid didn't die, that is to say that he lived. He would have lived it. Huh? I think that the conditional tense would be appropriate when we talk about that time. He was an assassin of the Khalifa. He was a D, if you like, because you know that the terrorist group is Islamic. A terrorist group of the age did not invent anything. In fact, you know, he just did it. He. He took acts that happened in the past that are documented very clearly in Islamic books. By the way, I showed you a certain number of them, and then he just replayed them, okay? As for those who do not want to read. So having DH and what is written in these books and what happens is that one of the great ones, one of the great inspirers of Daish, there are a lot of terrorist groups that bear. His name is Khal Willied. His specialty, he worked as a mercenary for the first caliph. His specialty was to go and slaughter entire villages like he did in Algeria during the 90s, and then cut off the heads of the men. They were boiling their heads. I had talked about it, even with the evidence, and all that. And while the heads were boiling, he was raping the women. And some books dare to say that by literally violating the sacredness of the marriage bond, he was marrying her. That's why today, in the Arab Muslim countries, for various reasons that I will explain to you one day, very often, rape and marriage are confused. That means that, for example, in marriage there is no concept of rape. Many husbands rape their wives and it is considered normal. And at the same time, there are many rapists who are offered the possibility in court to marry their victims so that the prosecution for rape is no longer brought. Do you understand what I mean? The fact that our society sanctifies scoundrels means that we have blurred the scale of good and evil, just so that these scoundrels can still emerge as decent people. And today, Today an Islamic school is being created that bears the name of a terrorist in France, in your country. And the result, I. I'm not going to beat around the bush. The result is that he will come and massacre you in your villages. It's quite simple for us. That's how it happened, okay? The laws of physics are the same in Algeria and France. I would like to draw your attention to this detail. Okay? What I mean is that the first time we heard the name of this scoundrel, we started a tachometer. Like a few years later, the first massacre happened, right? So in your country, you hear this loudly, you start the stopwatch, and you might see that the laws of physics have changed. I don't know. In any case, I'll give you the link to my Facebook page. You can see for yourself. So sorry, it was just a passage like that. So I wanted to talk to you. I took a sheet of paper, you know, I'm not thinking anymore. That's how it is. Ah, I took a sheet of paper, I just put three dots. Ah. So there are people who wrote to me today because Mr. Philippe left the National Front. They tell me, yes, the National Front. You support the National Front? You don't support the National Front. I think I was very clear on that subject. On that subject. But I would like to tell you something. I would like to tell you something important. As you know, every people must free themselves from something. For example, we Algerians, it is obvious that we must free ourselves from the grip of religion and the grip of Arabism. You know what I am going to tell the Algerians in my next video in Arabic, I will tell you in advance. I will tell them that I am going to launch a business like this. Just A little bit to get things going. I am saying I am going to launch a business and all that. I am going to launch an appeal to fine investors. But listen carefully to the story, the plan, the business model. What is it? It is to go to Saudi Arabia with these big tanker trucks that allow us to pump out the sewers, right? Send tubes there, fill the city with sewers, and bring it back to Algeria to sell it. That means so that people can take showers under the sewers of Saudi Arabia to get closer to God. Because in fact, we have a completely terrible situation in our country today. They are selling us piss. Camel piss. Saudi camel piss, right? So how can I put it? How can I express it? The problem in our societies is that there are a lot of scams, there is a lot of deception about the goods. I can guarantee you one thing. There are. If you buy Saudi camel piss, they will sell you piss that was probably collected from construction sites, from school exits, from barracks, from bars, from. Do you understand what I mean? That's it. And in fact, it is this piss, the human piss that they are literally going to drink. So since it potentially comes from Saudi Arabia, they are ready to drink it. So I offer them something with sewers and all that. So what was I saying? The case is completely fictitious. Of course, you get the idea. I'm saying this for those who sometimes don't get the irony. So what's happening is that I think today the issue of France national and everything is a question of the past. It's an outdated question to that extent. I think that supporting or not supporting this party, well, the people who support it can continue to do so. Of course, there are people who have done it for generations, from father to son. It's a family thing. It's a thing. Well, keep doing it, but just for fun. It allows you to belong to a nice group like that, with the feeling of resisting something. But deep down, deep down, I think that the French need to free themselves. Free themselves from what? Let me tell you something. If I look at the French elections, the election results, the French vote exactly like a college made up of journalists who. Artists, comedians, intellectuals, writers and all that. Do you understand? The French vote like a college, like that. If I took a college made up of, I don't know, 300, 400 people who have the corporate name that I just described. Well, they would systematically vote like the French or the French would vote like them. So that allows me to say today that the French are under the influence of the politically correct Parisian Bobocracie. These are people who, like all the people I just described, live directly or indirectly off your money without financing themselves with it. I'm not even talking about the money they earn. I'm talking about the money they receive directly from subsidies and other things. These are people who are subsidized, who generally have a better life than the average French person, and who allow themselves to theorize about all sorts of things in their living rooms. The problem is that you follow them, collectively speaking. I'm not saying that each of you follows them, but collectively what you give. And I think that before talking about the National Front to anyone else, you'll have to free yourself from this straitjacket of political correctness, because as long as you're under their straightjacket, I assure you, these people are literally Sodom and Gomorrah. They're going to send you and your country down the drain. You won't even understand what happened. Just to give you a bit of an idea of what these leftist groups are like, the left caused 100 million deaths last century. Sorry, 100 million deaths. We're in 2017. That. That means if they want to cause 100 million deaths this century, they're a bit behind. Ah, but they'll catch up, don't worry. So be very careful. Okay? That's something else I wanted to talk to you about the storm. There was quite a storm in France and on French territory in any case. And what's happening is that St. Martin and I was overwhelmed by the reaction of the French government. The French government. I think many people were disappointed by the reaction of the French government. I wasn't disappointed. So I think the French government was overwhelmed. But that's a classic. I think I had no faith in that government at the beginning. But to go further, what saddened me a little was people's reaction, because let me explain something to you. You see, I don't think that the world as we know it is going to collapse. I don't think there's a world collapse or an alien landing or an asteroid hitting Earth or something else that would cause cataclysms and all that. I don't believe in that. On the other hand, I believe that each of us, individually or perhaps as a group, on the scale of a city or an island or half a country or whatever, can have cataclysms. Cataclysms can be an earthquake, a volcano, a surprise transplant, as simple as that. A surprise general strike. Well supported. And then very quickly, things go very badly. Urban disasters, in short, lots of things that can happen in a normal life. A storm is precisely one of those events. The thing is, how did people react? Where are the police? Where are the gendarmerie? Where are the civil servants? Where is she? Where is the mayor? Where is the prefect, the. I mean guys, your safety and the safety of your family? When it comes to the first line of defense, it's you, it's not the state, it's not the police, it's you, really. So the average French person is going to have to get out of this logic of seeing the state as a kind of paternalistic figure, which must be there to protect them, which must be there to watch over their safety, make sure they have water, make sure they have food reserves, make sure they have taken precautions when a storm was here and we knew it was coming for 10 days. Do you understand what I mean? It's going to be necessary because, for example, there's a guy, he wrote to me, he told me in Mexico, he's in South America. He told me in Mexico they have earthquakes, storms, all that. I mean, it's a bit like they're living the Almas in Ribilis. But he was a bit surprised by the solidarity of the Mexicans. Why? Because Mexicans aren't used to counting on their state. Mexicans organize themselves. They organize themselves individually at the family level, but they organize themselves at the street level, at the city level. And that creates a society that when it's hit by a disaster, it's civil society that reacts. Whereas the French, excuse me, see the chaos coming. They're in front of their TV commenting, and they have six hours of food in the fridge. But that won't work because they say to themselves that the day the flood hits our heads, the state and the civil servants and the gender, Mary, the police and the city hall and all that will be there to take care of us. And then when they're not there, well, where is dad? He didn't let me down, you know. So I would just like to point out this trait. But it's true that it's true that it's a trait that's been built up over generations and it's not something that's the latest thing. Well, North Korea, I think I mentioned it. I see that Mr. Trump in the forces continues to defend ISIS. By the way. I mean, the guy, he's completely. By the way, I don't think I'm going to get too involved in politics anymore. You know, the next elections, whether in France, the United States or elsewhere, I don't think I'm going To be particularly interested in them. Because I no longer believe that there is salvation in the collective. I believe that salvation today can only come at the individual level. You just have to arrange your life on an individual level, on a personal level, on a family level, so that no matter what happens, no matter which candidate is elected, no matter what economic decisions are made, your life stays on track. I think that's where salvation lies, because you can no longer expect salvation from the collective. You can no longer expect salvation from the top of the pyramid. It's the people at the top of the pyramid who think about themselves, think about their families, think about the people they've been in collusion with for a very long time and all that. And their interests diverge completely from yours, from mine. And I don't think that by electing one or the other, when people come to power, they're going to think about the interests of the grassroots. No, they're going to think about the interests of the people in their class. And they completely forget about the rest. When I said that North Korea. Well, North Korea is very interesting because today we hear stories about Mr. Jim Jang, so and so. Well, excuse me, I'm not very good at North Korean. Ah, he kills people in Lassie, he rapes women en masse and all that. It's funny, it reminded me of the harams of the Arab caliphs. And yet they are very good. They have very good press in the region. But suddenly when it's Kim Jong, so and so who does it, it's bad. The fact remains that who told them that he's an asylum seeker, a defector, someone who defected? The problem is that the west eats up stories about defectors. Well, the, the problem is that when someone asks for asylum, it's in their interest to tell a story. It has to be solid for people to believe them. It has to be as outrageous as possible. So you put some in. You go ahead and remember the last 10 horror movies you've watched. Then you take scenes from there and put them on paper. And in fact, that's the problem, is that today I may surprise myself and maybe the word is excessive. I'm going to put it in quotation marks. But I almost have sympathy for Mr. Kim Jong Un because I know this press now. I know this press, this press that we have here for Daesh. It was before it turned around and still weekly Daesh. They are, what do you call them? These are literally Republicans, people who are there to defend the widow and the orphan, and Democrats, moderate rebels who in the morning Fight against the butcher. Because we've heard the word butcher before. Bash Al Assad, the guy like a binder. He defended his country when it was out of terrorists who came from 80 countries and under the insults and invectives of newspapers, French newspapers, for example, Western newspapers. So I was saying that I have the impression that if you want to know who's a nice. Bank statements, go through invoices, go everywhere, access everything, make photocopies of all the files, find out what their ammunition stocks are, what kind of weapons they have, how many hours of training each soldier has done, or without fail, position their air defenses, or without fail, position their guns, how many tanks they have, how many tanks are in working order, how much strategic fuel, fuel, food and other supplies they have. Then once they had demonstrated all that, to show their good faith, okay, to show their good faith, they might have even destroyed some stockpiles of weapons like that, marginally conventional, just to say, look, we're clean. Once they had done all that, we would have bombed them to the ground. There would still be another asylum seeker. Now, Nigeria, for example, it happened to Iraq, which would have sent a British spreadsheet, a crappy fax like that, with some Excel spreadsheets showing invoices for, I don't know, cannonide or something like that, you know, prudic acid or whatever, you know, or concentrated bleach, whatever. We just take something to scare the housewife, you know? Then after, boom, the painting would start like that, in excitement. And then, no, we have to bomb there. We are going to bomb it. And he would have bombed it to the corps sent to the Middle Ages. And anyway, knowing where its air defenses are, knowing where its strategic reserves are, knowing the size of its army, knowing everything, well, there it is clear that it is clear that it is clear that it is clear that it would have been very easy, huh? They would have just given a junior general from the American army another. He would have done it that it is the Arab country. So that is why. That is why North Korea does not want to play the Arab country game. That is why North Korea plays differently. Understand? But hey, somewhere I will tell you, I do not hide from you. This is just between us. This is not normally said. I am very happy that Trump is looking for trouble with North Korea. Why? Because. Let me explain. I understood something about the United States. In the United States, they have a war industry. They have millions of people who work in the war industry at all levels, direct and indirect employment. It's a big economy that revolves around war. So if there are five years of peace, if there is a term or two of peace, it's over. It's a disaster. There are people who are going to get poorer, so they need a war. Whatever the reason, a war has to be launched. And so what happens? Trump could have launched it against Algeria, against Tunisia, against Morocco. He could have found, you know, the same speech that is given about North Korea. They could have given it about any Arab Muslim country. Usually it's the Arab Muslim country that dies. It could be Qatar, it could be anyone. Okay, he chose North Korea. There you go. That's original. It's a change for us for once, that's all. Because, you know, I wouldn't have wanted him to touch the Arabs or the Muslims. Why am I telling you this? Because I come from there. I come from there. I really like those countries. Those are the countries I come from. So you see, everyone fights for their own church, for their own parish, as they say. So for me, it's true that it avoids Arab countries. That's it. I'm a little reassured, even if the poor North Koreans didn't do anything to deserve all this. But for us, you know, the countries that aren't Muslims, our problem is that we're too corrupt. Our heads are stuck in the underwear of our sisters and mothers. Do you understand what I mean? Because one day we would get our heads out of girls underwear and panties, right? We could perhaps become credible countries in terms of defense, in terms of geostrategy, in terms of power, not just military power, because that's not all there is to it. Strategic power, diplomatic power, economic power. We could become serious people, you know? But as long as we're stuck in there, like I told you, we're cannon fodder. I mean, anyone who wants to bomb can come along, right? It's not. It's not. That's all. And last thing, it's not even written on the sheet. It's not even written on the sheet. It was. It was a story. Yes, In London. There was an attack in London. Well, a mini attack, a failed attack. They arrested, I was going to say an isolated, unbalanced person. No, they have arrested six people so far. Six people is still the result of a system. Because it is hard to bring together six people for such a disastrous project and for all six people to participate. That no one comes out, that no one reports it, no one calls the police, no one wakes up at 3am thinking, what am I going to do? No way. It's horrible. Your people, people in the subway, people who haven't done anything to you. Women, children, adults, men, people with different stories. A couple on their honeymoon, a guy traveling, another who may have escaped cancer, a child who may be the only child of his parents. I mean, people. People with different destinies who cross paths in the space of two or three stops on the subway. You go and plant a bomb in the middle of it. It's abominable, my friends, in a country that protected these people, okay? It's absolutely. It's absolutely abominable. I'd like to tell you something. Never in the history of humanity have the fantasies of some have been so superior to the lives of others. Honestly, I'm going to tell you how I think it. I'm going to tell you how I really think it. Because, you know, we're not faced with a difficult choice. We're not faced with a choice where we're faced with a system, lets say, where everyone is fighting for their lives, for example, where there's a fight to the death, where there are absolutely extraordinary stakes on one side and on the other, where we can say that it's true, that it's delicate, it's hard to see. No, on the one hand, we have people who only want to live, who don't hurt anyone, who are in the subway, who are going to their studies, who are going to their work, who are going to visit someone, who are out walking, and who have just one request, that of living, that of returning home in one piece. A request as simple, as legitimate as that today. And what are we facing them? We're facing people who want to kill. Because. Listen to this one. Because in ancient texts, texts found on jars of water, jars of dogs, bones, boards, texts, we don't even know who wrote them. Why do ancient grimoires say that there is a deity who loves blood, who has a deity, who, when someone kills fur and he dies, he wakes up as a zombie. He has the right to fornicate with an incredible number of women. Here's the right to life of people on one side of the scale and on the other side, the delusions and fantasies of some. Never in history, the fantasies of some. The fantasies of some have never equaled the lives of others. We are living this today. The Caliph, the Caliph of the Catholics, this guy, this Marxist who walks around in the habit of a pope. I think bouffant clothes would have been better for him, perhaps decreed that. How did he say it? Wait, I'm looking for the sentence I read in English. He said something like this. The security of Host populations or the security of Western populations should not be more important than the rights of migrants. That's it. Something like that. Okay. That means that if our Lord the migrant wants to please his divinity, wants to get into a subway car with a bomb and blow it up on us, okay, well, ideally, we should all just come and lie down on the bomb, and then our Lord the terrorist can kill us. And like that, he can go to his divinity fornicate. There you have it. It's quite astonishing the times we live in. It's quite astonishing. But I think today it's a rather bitter observation that I'm making. I think that after 1400 years of struggle, and that was the history of the world, we would be in the three thousands without this struggle, huh? We would be in the three thousands in terms of evolutionary techniques and so on. If we hadn't lost, if the west hadn't gone through, the west wouldn't have lost a good part of its blood, energy and resources. Fighting for 1,400 years against a doctrine that wants to bring people to their knees. I think that after 1400 years, they decided to kneel anyway. They said, we'll kneel, and then, uh, we hope they'll be gentle. We hope they'll be good lords, you know. There you go. I'll leave you with this very bitter statement. I'm measuring it by saying it. And I'll see you another time. I don't even know what to title this video, because it goes off in all directions, doesn't it? It talks in all directions. See you soon, my friends. Mister.