Royaume-Uni : Accélération de l’Effondrement

Hello, my friends. The guy you see in the photo here is Locme Middle. He is one of the richest men in the United Kingdom. Does that ring a bell? Arcelor Mittel. Of course, that's his name in the company. It's the steel giant. The United Kingdom is in the news this week. We are in a phase, let's say, of the terminal collapse. If I were to make this video in a month, I would tell you something even more serious. That means we are no longer in a gradual descent towards the, uh, bottomless pit. This time it's the big acceleration. Mr. Middle. Well, he is going to leave the United Kingdom. He is not the only one. We have billionaires at the end of their tether. Everyone is leaving. We are having a mass exodus from this country. The United Kingdom became the first G7 country this week to no longer be able to manufacture its own steel. The United Kingdom manufactures steel that's all over. For a very long time we manufactured it, but today it's over. So we are in a collapse caused by whom? Well, I don't want to be partisan. I don't want to tell you it's the fault of the Labor Party who are in power. No, the Labor Party who are in power are of course destroying the country. But the ones who were there before did exactly the same. So today the word collapse is used. The United Kingdom is collapsing. Some people have said to me, yeah, but maybe they want to punish the nation so that it can join the European Union later on. I don't even think so. At this rate, I think in a year or two the United Kingdom will be too poor a country for the European Union to want it. Today, if we take the Competitiveness Index of OECD countries, the United Kingdom is in 30th position and will gradually slide towards the bottom of the ranking. It is currently moving towards position 35 or 36. That means that worse than the United Kingdom we will find France, worse than the United Kingdom we will find. I don't know. We would have to go all the way to Colombia to find countries that have aggressive anti work, anti corporate, anti growth practices. And that raises the question, is this incompetence? Well, you see, that's where I get a little stuck. I know that many people say, yes, they are incompetent. And I agree that in a way it's true that when you take on a position like that of Minister of the Economy, for example, well, I'm not really for it. I'm perhaps not very democratic in such a position. Let me give you an example. Lets imagine that we are in an airport in a waiting room, and then someone suddenly stands up on a platform and says, listen, we're fed up with the same people always being in the cockpit. These are pilots who have been there for 20 years. Today, I want to democratize the practice a little bit. What we're going to do is launch an election and we're going to take five minutes per person to make a speech, and then we'll applaud whoever makes the best speech, we'll vote for them, and then they'll be the ones who pilot the plane. Can you imagine that? A plane like that wouldn't go very far. There would be, uh, an airplane graveyard at the end of the Runway. Huh? If we did something like that. So it's not democratic. It's the same for many things. And I think that for a role as technical as that of Minister of the Economy, we're taking people who are very often illiterate in economic matters. The United Kingdom. The United Kingdom, for example, has just reached this situation where there is too much tax, you tax it. That means we are increasing taxes. There is a historic tax increase like never before in this country. And at the same time, what is happening to tax revenues? They are collapsing. Why? Because people are leaving. Because those who want to invest are no longer investing. Companies that wanted to expand are no longer doing so. Those who want to recruit are not recruiting, and so on. So the economy is shrinking, the economy is freezing. The economy is stalling. Now, our Minister of the Economy, Rachel Reeves, if you look at her career, you look at her cv, she is anything but ignorant. She is anything but literate in economics. She has, if you look at her education, her career, it is a very solid, it's a very serious path. So what's happening in this country isn't happening inadvertently. That's where I come up with my theory that it's sabotage. And that's why I don't like the word collapse. Why? Because my collapse suggests an accident. A building collapsed. It was too old. No maintenance was done. There was a gust of wind, an earthquake, it collapsed. The country isn't collapsing in that sense. It's being sabotaged. It's being blown up. Look, I think the Kingdom has chosen to be a poor country. We didn't consult the British, but it's poor again, it's tyrannical again, it's planned. I don't believe in accidents. It's done on purpose. Many things are accelerating the fall. First, what is called the net Zero program. Net zero is not just a conversation. It is not just a vague project or outline, a project that changes from one minister to another. Net zero means net zero carbon. So the country wants to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, and it wants to achieve it by force. It is mandatory in the sense that there is an enforceable law. It means that the country has condemned itself by its own laws to deindustrialization. It no longer has a choice. It must deindustrialize. But what do we see? For example, we see R. Kormitol closing down. The country no longer produces steel. We can't say it was an accident. If we promise you that we will do something for years and then this thing happens, you can't say it was an accident. They didn't do it on purpose. No, it was done on purpose. The country wants to destroy, because there is a extremely powerful ideology that wants this good country to destroy itself, to see if that changes anything to the climate. So we'll see. We'll see in 50 years. It changes anything. I can tell you it. It won't change anything. But there you have it. There's an extremely powerful dogma. Another thing that's sinking us is the fact that. Well, it could be those who remembered German reunification. You remember when East Germany joined West Germany, right? The two Germanys joined. Well, these two Germanies are technically the same country. There was one that was originally. Well, that came about after the Second World War, because the Swiss franc lines were frozen at one point, and that was it. That created a divided Germany. Then Germany reunited. And we saw these scenes of the fall of the Berlin Wall. But financially it was very hard. Why? Because West Germany, which was booming economically, was very industrial, had investment, creativity, employment, all that found itself within East Germany. That was on its knees. That had to be supported, that had to be put up with. It was very hard in the United Kingdom. We are in a very similar situation. We merged with Ukraine. That means that today we have merged with a country with which we have no borders. We do not share the same language. There is no cultural interest, there is no historical interest. But for the moment, we have signed binding agreements, agreements that are firm and will last for 100 years. And we are paying for pensions in Ukraine, civil servants salaries. We are paying for weapons, we are paying for the running of the state. We are distributing billions while we are a country extremely indebted and no longer producing anything, and whose tax revenues are collapsing. To give you an example, the top 1% of the rich, the top 1% of the highest income earners pay 30% of their taxes. So a third of the taxes are paid by the top 1% of the richest. If we take the top 10% of the richest, they pay 60% of the total tax. So when you have a rich person who leaves, you lose the equivalent of thousands of tax households. And the advantage of this rich person is that it is a tax household with a consistent income year after year, which is always there. So they have a solid tax income. Whereas if we look further down at the employees, there may be someone who pays, and then next year they no longer have a job, or the following year they have been demoted. Do you see what I mean? Whereas the very wealthy have sometimes been paying high amounts for generations. I'm not in defending them, I'm not trying to, but you have to know one thing. Where they roll out the red carpet for them elsewhere, they're rolling out a tax bill for them. Here it's simple. And when you take this guy from middle, I understand him, because here, even though he lives in London, I'm going to say there's no guarantee that his son or daughter won't be attacked by thugs in London. London is becoming cutthroat. I mean, the quality of life, the insecurity, the inflation, the quality of life in general. Even if very rich people like that are perhaps not directly affected by inflation, they don't give a damn. It's perhaps not something that affects them, but what does affect them is the deterioration of the living environment, the hostility towards creativity, the hostility towards success. Because the deeper we sink into poverty, the more the population looks for someone to blame. And today the. The guilty party is the people who create the rich people. We think that they are the ones who stole from us. It's a bit like that, that people see it that way. You see threads on Twitter, for example, where people say that if we tax the rich 30%, we could completely eliminate our deficit. Yes, but these are the kinds of tweets, and that's what's worrying. And it gives you the general feeling that sometimes they get liked thousands of times. It means that there are people who believe that we can just go and hold people up and say, you pay up. And then, uh, we take that money and continue living as if nothing happened. And what do we do? Next year we'll hold them up a second time, and next year we'll hold them up again after that. They think they'll just sit there like pigs in a shooting gallery waiting for us to come and shoot them, rob them Rob them, Rob them. And in the meantime, money is being wasted on ideology. It's being wasted on wars that don't interest us. Today I was reading a press release from a request. Not a press release, but a request, a demand from about 20 British parliamentarians who are calling on the British government to build an airport in Kashmir. I mean, today we have people who are campaigning for their own country, for the country of their hearts or whatever. But it's reaching obscene proportions. I mean, there you have it. So, my friends, I just wanted to give you an update. I don't know. I don't know where this is going to take us, do I? I don't know where it's leading us. But in any case, the situation is extremely chaotic. I'll keep you posted, aware of what is happening. And I hope that soon enough, in the coming weeks, I will be able to keep you more informed of what is happening here. Because I will no longer be here. Because I too understand that I am leaving. That is where it seriously starts to become a lot. See you soon, my friends. Mister.