A first-person YouTube monologue reacting to the death of Lieutenant Colonel Arnaud Beltrame, who exchanged himself for a hostage. The speaker praises Beltrame's courage while sharply criticizing French political rhetoric and the country's counter-terrorism approach (notably the practice of cataloguing suspects in an 'S file' rather than preventing attacks). The video contrasts perceived codes of honor in historical criminals with what the speaker describes as Islamist attackers who, citing a theological text (Volume 13, p.40), are portrayed as committed to killing without negotiation; the speaker argues France's largely emotional response and lack of sanctions risks encouraging further attacks.
Good morning, my friends. I learned this morning with great sadness of the death of the gendarmerie officer, Mr. Arnaud Beltram, who was a lieutenant colonel in the gendarmerie and who gave his life to exchange himself for a hostage, a woman in particular. And what also bothers me is to see politicians talking about the honorable act that was his. Since when do these politicians have the slightest idea of what the word honor means?
Okay.
So today he is seeking forgiveness for being the one who perhaps brings us back to reality. But today what I see is that he is seeking, through this heroic act on which he is focusing all the attention to transform this story into a happy ending, literally. That means they know that people are fed up with negative stories and that if from time to time there is a heroic act or something out of the ordinary that allows them to still believe, to still have faith in humanity, well, we have to serve them.
Okay?
And then it allows us to forget the absolutely disturbing realities that we don't want to talk about. For example, the failure of the French strategy to combat terrorism. To try to have one. Because I'm not calling for fighting terrorism, but to have police services that record potential terrorists, put them in a file they call the S file, and then wait until the terrorists take action and kill people. If you call that a strategy to combat terrorism. Sorry, you're not there yet. That's the first point. Second point, I'd like to remind you of something. Uh, you know, there was a guy who was called public enemy number one. He wore glasses and drove a big BMW. I think his name was Mesrine, Jacques Mesrine. There you go, the name comes up again. Jacques Messine and Jacques Mesrine. I saw a report about him. At one point he. He was surrounded by cops. He was in an apartment in Paris. He was surrounded by cops, and he asked their chief to come up to him. So the chief came forward. He went home to the apartment that was surrounded. Mesrine served him champagne. They drank. They each had a glass. And then, well, he came to terms with it. He followed him and he surrendered to the police without violence. If you even look at the films of the time, the fictional films of the time, they presented the thugs with a certain code of honor. At the time, there was one with the Islamists. I would like to tell you that I thought the authorities had understood this. Since the Islamists have been attacking France for so long. I thought it was a fact that had been taken on board. But in fact, I see that it has not yet been taken on board. When Islamists go out and commit an attack, it is to kill and get killed. And they have absolutely no code of honor in this matter. I invite you to watch the video, an abominable video that I made about three weeks ago where for one hour I read a book. I put it in the Description, a book that inspired the bearded men who trained the jihadists.
Okay?
But not only that, it is a book that can be found in universities, in the Islamic world, in mosques, in courts and so on. This is a relatively common book, but it is an extremely important book for those who study the doctrine and those who are responsible for communicating the doctrine. Volume 13, page 40 is about jihad. I brought you back to this. This is the first page, and this is page 40 on page 40. I read it at about minute 45 of the video in question. Okay, so what is it about? I will read it to you from memory. I don't even need to look at the text. I will tell you in Arabic. I will show it to you. So what is it about? Back then, when two armies met to wage war, it was always common at the beginning of the battle for someone from the opposing camp to come forward and say to the Muslims, send me one of your men. I would like to fight him man to man.
Okay?
So they met one by one and then they fought.
Okay?
Sometimes there would be one duel, two duels, three duels, depending on the motivation of each. What does this text say, this theological reference text, what does it say? It says if a non believer comes forward to ask for a man to man duel sword against sword, or point against point or whatever, it is permitted, it is Islamically permissible to kill him with an arrow because he is a non believer. He is a mushrik, as he is described exactly in the text. That means he is an associator and there is no right to have any words with him.
Okay?
So the acquittal is completely permissible. That means that if this group of police officers had found themselves facing, for example, bandits locked up or surrounded in a bank who were demanding, I don't know who, a car to get away in and the possibility of leaving with their loot and a hostage at that point, you can always negotiate. You can always try to talk to them man to man. If they're holding a woman hostage, you can say, listen, release the girl. Let her go. We have all day. We're going to do it. We're going to do it man to man. I'm coming. I'll replace her. Everything will be fine. You can Say that. You can say it, but with Islamist terrorists, it doesn't work. They won't appreciate the gesture. They won't enter into an agreement with you. They won't give a word and respect it. They won't talk to you man to man. There's no notion of honor. You will never be able to convince them of this logic of honor. Even if it is an intruder, it does not exist with them. They have an explicit duty not to do this to you, not to keep any of their word with you. So ignoring this, if we summarize the situation in an extremely factual manner, the French state offered one of these men, a lieutenant colonel in this particular case, offered him as a holocaust, offered him as a sacrifice to a terrorist. The. That's all I know. There is a story behind it and everything, but the facts are there. The French state offered one of these men from the Navy to a terrorist that it assassinated. So what I advise you to do today is to go and do internships with the Algerians, to go and do internships with the Russians, whom you hate, because the media has told you that Putin is an abominable monster who kills terrorists or moderate rebels. Sorry.
Okay?
I invite you to do an internship with the Israelis, with the Americans. I am telling you about nations that do not offer their men to terrorists, okay? And today, this country called France is giving off such an image that you wonder if they are really like that or if they are just playing dirty games on purpose.
Okay?
Because no country in the world is so submissive to terrorism. I am sorry. No country in the world allows foreigners or even non foreigners to circulate on its territory knowing clearly that they have terrorist intentions. Only France does this. There's only one country in the world that does this. It's called France, okay? It's mind boggling. It's mind boggling. And today. Well, today we're going to focus on this story. We're going to feed the emotional side of the population to try to lull their rational side. Every time someone. Every time the government services or a politician or a journalist appeals to your emotional side, it's most often to lull your rational side. So they don't want to have anything to do with it. But on the rational side, they. They offered a man, one of their men, a terrorist who killed him. And I'll tell you something else, huh? It has nothing to do with this video. Now, I'll tell you something. We're only 24 hours after this attack. There have been no sanctions, okay? Because you have to Know that Islamists are brought up on the idea of blood money. Hmm. Okay, blood money. What is the price of the victim's blood? The reference is mineral water. Is it more expensive or less expensive than mineral water? It means that when an Islamist kills someone among a people like the French, for example, whom Islamists see as crusaders or polytheists or whatever, it doesn't matter how the French see themselves. I'm telling you how they see you. Uh, does the enemy react or not? Is there a sanction or not? The reality is that there aren't any.
Okay?
The reality is that there aren't any. At most, during the night, they would have caught 15,000 Islamists. They would have made an aerial survey and dropped them on an African island. That would be cool. It's clear that they understand that if you kill one of their own, expect a reaction. Really expect them to come and it's going to be a mess, as they say. There won't be anything here. Candles, songs, rose petals, messages written on the ground. We're starting to get the hang of it, Right? That's clear. Right. But the international Islamists, the terrorist groups that are behind all this, see that France is providing absolutely no response apart from getting emotional. That's it. That's all. And that's very, very bad for the future. That's all. So that's it, my friends. I'll leave you. I just wanted to share my opinion with you. I'm going to go back to vacation mode. I'm going to calm down for a while because this whole thing really got on my nerves. Well, most of my videos are videos that I made because I got carried away and I'm never really in control anyway. Okay, well, may this guy rest in peace. That's what we can say about him. For him, it's over. He made an extremely courageous, extremely honorable gesture. And on stage you think this country doesn't deserve people like him. It's like killing yourself, literally, consciously giving your life for people who haven't even dared to get up in the morning to vote for their side for 40 years while their country is going to hell. I'm going to say you say he's too good for them, that's all. Anyway, let's stop talking to Mother. Anyway, it won't change anything. And I'll be back when I get back. See you soon. And thank you for being there. Yes.
