Trump et Poutine décident du sort de l'Europe sans l'Europe

Good morning, my friends. Trump is meeting Putin. This is the first time in a very long time that a Russian president has visited the United States. He is meeting at a military base in Alaska. And imagine that the agenda is peace in Europe. And this is being done without Europe. No European country is represented. We are in a situation where decisions are made between adults. So they are going to talk among themselves, discuss, and then once it is over, once it is done, they are going to inform the Europeans of what has been decided for them. And this is truly a real slap in the face that has been compared by many observers to those great conferences that took place during the Second world war in 1943. The United States, the USSR, and the United Kingdom were represented at the time. Then we had the Yalta conference, the same thing, with the same speakers. And a little later, we had the Potsdam Conference, which was the longest of all, the most important, because it was August 1945. The World War had ended. It was a conference that lasted, I think, about two weeks. So really, it was a long meeting where we decided what to do with the Europeans. And they learned it through the media like everyone else. So we can say. We can always find the excuse of saying, yes, but at the time, Europe was devastated by the World War, was under bombs, destruction, the people were weakened, misery, hardship, famine, the good ones. We're willing to accept that. It's true. We're willing to accept that. But today we have no excuses. That means that today we have decades of European construction, 80 years of construction, isn't it? European reconstruction? And we see that Europe is exactly at the same point. Europe has suffered a downgrading that has reached such a level that its fate is being decided without it. So today we have Putin, who has landed in Alaska. So the one who runs the business while Putin is negotiating is Medvedev. So Medvedev is in Moscow, and he has his hand on the button, on the gong, as they say, huh? And if there's a problem, bam, he's able to react. Okay, so far, things are going very well. Putin's car and equipment preceded him there with Chinese planes, a sort of airlift. Many planes flew between the military base and Moscow. And then it culminated with Putin's arrival. The journalists, the Russian journalists are complaining a little. They say they were given very poor accommodation. They were housed in a sort of large conference room that was divided by partitions. And then they put in, uh, how should I say, Makeshift beds, military beds, and the comfort is extremely spartan. In addition, since they don't have roaming because of the sanctions, they have a lot of trouble communicating. But overall, in this case, the story will take place in wilot between Putin and Trump. Last night, Zensky was in London and then an absolutely astonishing scene occurred. We have the British Prime Minister, Kay Starmer, who came out to the front of 10 Ding street, in front of number 10, which is also closed off. You know, there was a time when people could get right up to the front door. Now the whole street is closed off by gates. They are metal gates. And in fact, what happened is that they came out and started cuddling each other. That means that we are really in the realm of spectacle, politics. We are in the realm of fragility, the politics of tears, the politics of emotion. So he started hugging him. And the images, even videos, were shared with the British Prime Minister and he added rose tinted music on top of it. So literally, like the 15 year old teenager, years old, who has a broken heart, who writes poems, who reads them with music, music with Odros against a backdrop of tears and petals falling from the sky. I mean, that's where we are. You understand why these countries are not invited to this kind of decision today. The United Kingdom, I told you at the beginning of the video about Tehran, Yalta, Potsdam and so on, they were there. Today, they're not even there. It's over. It's a country that is in the process of sinking into relevance, as they say in English. That means it no longer has any role to play. Macron, the same thing. Makron, he would have liked to go to Alaska. He would have liked to show off a little, to be on first name terms with everyone, to show off in front of journalists, to say, yes, we, with our European partners, we have imposed a strong voice, we have threatened, we have hit out at the table. That opportunity was not given to him. Because why? Because Macron is playing politics for the sake of it. Macron isn't playing politics to negotiate between statesmen, is he? Because he doesn't have the stature of a statesman. So he's not here to negotiate, he's here just to gossip. That means he's here to make a scene like that. Then the journalist from the Elysee immortalized him and shared it on social media. That's all. He's at that level of childishness. In fact, he's someone who didn't want to grow up. And in reality, if you look at what's happening today, it would be unimaginable with presidents. I wouldn't want to go as far as de Gaulle, but even people like at the time people like Mitterrans, at the time of people like, uh, how he, his name is Chirac, isn't it? Or at the time when we had Elmout Al Mouth Kahl or Schroeder in Germany, all that stuff, it's not something that would have happened. We wouldn't have decided because Europe still had a voice, a strong voice, a diplomacy that was heard throughout the world. Today. Europe is really sinking into backwardness. You know, Europe, for your information, in all the cutting edge technologies, the technologies that make up the modern economy today, I'm talking about artificial intelligence, I'm talking about clouds, I'm talking about new technologies. Europe is absent. You know, there's no Europe in there. So we have a Europe that is moralizing the entire planet, lecturing the world. And then people look on from afar and say, well, I'm not listening to them, don't listen to them. So what happens is that once the decisions are made by the people who matter, Putin and Trump, it is important to know that the war, this war in Ukraine, was initially triggered by the Biden administration. It was the Biden administration that used a well known provocation technique, the same technique, by the way, which even if the story is a little more complicated than it seems, remember the time when Kennedy was in power? I think that roughly speaking, don't quote me on this, it was roughly 1963. I'm just saying that it was 1963. We had the Cuban missiles story where the USSR wanted to place missiles in Cuba and point them directly at Florida. And indeed, even though Cuba is an independent free country, it has the right to do what it wants. Right? There are still sensitivities. Geostrategic sensitivities mean that you can't go to the Russians, go to their border and say, well, this is NATO. It was clear that this would trigger a war. And so once the Biden administration triggered it, the Europeans through their vassalage, didn't look at their own interests. They didn't look at Germany, for example. They didn't look at the fact that once the private sector had access to cheap Russian hydrocarbons, which are really creating German miracles. Because what is the German miracle? It's the combination of German know how German engineering and cheap energy. So the cost of energy skyrocketed. They started using coal, they started bringing energy back across the American Atlantic. They bought gas from the U.S. it cost seven times more. And so at that point, well, Germany was in the process of us plunging. Uh, other countries, well, not other countries, all European Countries have experienced absolutely infernal inflation. We have experienced mass unemployment, businesses closing, tax hikes, instability. And we are talking about a third world war. And you have to know one thing, the European continent has already had two world wars. So when we talk about a third world war, who is worried? It worries investors, it worries financial flows, it worries all the people who are looking for stability. So these people are going to find refuge in the United States. They are going to find refuge in Asia, elsewhere. So Europe has literally sacrificed itself because an American president who was at the end of his term, just slapped them in the face. They went into a self immolation mindset. So President Biden is gone. That's it. He's no longer part of the equation. He's no longer there. Putin is coming. Well, you know all that. The Americans, they change administrations, they change presidents, like they change their shirts. And then every time, look at what happened in Afghanistan, what happened in Iraq, what happened elsewhere. I mean, he triggers things. Then another president comes along and says, why did they do that? And then he'll leave and he'll abandon all those involved in this story to their fate. So what Trump is doing today is a classic example of American politics. So he says to himself, I'm not interested in these wars, this war in Ukraine, all that. It's not my problem. He preferred to sign trade agreements with Russia, to see American companies position themselves in the territories and markets that were abandoned by the Europeans, including the French, who were hit hard by the recession, unemployment, and so on, out of servility to an administration that is no longer there today. Except that the European elite's servitude has been pushed to such an extreme, hasn't it? A paroxysm. So much so that they haven't realized that the master has changed. That means that Biden is no longer President. It's over, finished. He's gone. He won't come back. So Biden is no longer president and they are there. Yes, but Ukraine has to join NATO. No, no, the President decides. NATO is not decided by Germany. NATO is basically an American company. NATO is US made or made in the usa. NATO is an American system. NATO members are not equal. Incidentally, that's why De Gaulle, who was very, very sovereignist, lets say, had taken France out of NATO. And then NATO he even kicked out of France. He had NATO headquarters in France, he kicked out. So why? Because NATO members are not all equal. You have the United States, it's the boss. And you have all the others who are, in a logic of vassalage, they obey. But today we have France, Germany, and the entire coalition of the willing countries that want to continue this war at all costs. Well, they say yes, but Ukraine has to join the NATO alliance. No, sorry, Ukraine joins NATO or not, it's not up to you to decide. It's up to the United States. The United States says no, so you just shut up. That's all. That's all. You have absolutely no say in this quote. And they don't want to understand that. And in fact, what's going to happen in the coming days is going to be very, very delicate. Why? Because either I'm going to give you a few options or the Americans and the Russians reach an agreement. That's one thing. That's very good. Because after all, what's the goal of the game? The goal of the game is to stop the carnage on the ground. There are days when 2,000 people die on the ground, and that's happening every day. Every single day. And the people who are encouraging this war from afar aren't the ones on the ground eating each other's drones, okay? So this carnage has to stop. That's the most important thing. So the thing is, let's imagine that the Russians and the Americans reach an agreement. The problem is this coalition of morons, this coalition of the willing. I'm talking about France, the United Kingdom, Germany. Will they accept? No. Even if Ukraine accepts? They can say no. They can say no. Remember, this guy could have stopped in 2022 in Ankara when the Russians and the Ukrainians were about to sign an agreement. What did Boris Johnson do? B. Johnson, he got on a plane and he left saying, don't sign. We'll give you weapons, we'll give you money, we'll give you whatever you want. Please don't sign. Why? Because probably the British establishment needed this war, needed the continuation of this war. And frankly, I don't want to tell you, I don't want to say it. Okay? I just have something in parentheses that I excluded from this video, right, that you're watching right now. I'll just give you the title. The title is the role of the United Kingdom and the British elite in starting the First World War. That's what we call a rabbit hole. That's a rabbit hole. You know, it's a rabbit hole. If you go in that direction, you're going to discover a lot of things. There you go. Close the parenthesis. So I mean, they wanted or they still want to start a third world war on the European ground. You say, are they sick or What? They're not sick. Because European capitalism regularly needs to do an economic reset. At some point, it is necessary to destroy the means of production and then rebuild it and start a new economy, a new deal. And also in terms of budgets, printing money, laws and everything, a war economy is great for leaders because it allows them to have a great time. So that's the goal. And also the United Kingdom. Since 2014, the British have been subjected to daily brainwashing based on russophobia. I was a few weeks ago on a ship between the United Kingdom and Norway. It goes through the North Sea. It's a big, flat sea, not very deep. In reality, it's the horizon. You're far from land and the depth is 40 meters. It's not very deep. That's why there are lots of. There are lots of oil drilling stations. And I was at a table one evening chatting with some British people, families and all that. Normal people, right? And in fact, they told me like that under the guise of confidence. You. You know, at night, there are Russian submarines that come to watch us. I said, but how do they come to watch you? Where are they? Yes, they are there. They hide and then they take out a periscope, they take pictures of us, they watch us. I mean, the last time I really heard about this kind of thing, uh, it was a fisherman. You know, fishermen tend to believe in supernatural things. It was in Algeria. And he told me that they lived in a house that was located on the edge of a cemetery. Right. And that at night he saw things. Well, we are, we are very close to this, this kind of mental schema. I'm going to say, why a civilian cruise ship? We're going to spend money, we're going to send a Stealth nuclear submarine, 200 people died there to come and take your picture. I'm going to say we have to stop at some point. But we're in the point where the media has been throwing things out, Throwing things out, throwing out, throwing things out. And I can tell you, as someone who lived in the United Kingdom for a long time, the average Briton doesn't believe anything different from what the media tells them. And I have the impression that the average Frenchman, unfortunately, is also very close to this, to this mental condition. So if you want, they need this war, and this war is absolutely necessary. There are elites who have decided that. There you go. Well, they want to send their population to the slaughter. There you go. Then if you come back, you've got a leg missing, you've got an eye missing. Give them a medal. A little flag, there you go. We applaud you, you're very happy. And then that's it. I mean, you're going to trade a leg, right? Build a medal. I'm telling you to keep your leg, keep your eyes, go buy the medal on ebay. You know, it sells. There's no problem. You buy charms, you know, because you look at the soldiers from many countries, unfortunately, you know, who have died or been injured in many conflicts. So what's going to change is the charm. There's a yellow one, there's a green one, there's a blue one, one with stars. There's something. And I mean, for €50, you can buy a whole bunch and you'll stay alive. Unfortunately. Unfortunately. Well, well, that's the risk. Today, the Europeans will come and block peace efforts. Come and tell us, because just yesterday they said, yes, we agree to it, we agree to it for peace. But what we want is more sanctions on Russia, Ukraine's integration into the eu, Ukraine's integration into NATO, the United Kingdom. We want to send troops on the ground, we want to distribute more weapons. Russia must return Donbass in Crimea. They have to. So they have created conditions that are completely incompatible with any serious conversation to stop this conflict. They do it on purpose because they know that by promoting this kind of conversation and this kind of thing, it's something that won't go very far. The conversation won't go very far. And that's why they haven't become credible partners. They are not credible partners because they don't want to talk. They basically want war. So there you have it, my friends. We'll see how things will unfold in the the next few days. Now, if this summit ends in failure, meaning that the American and Russian sides cannot reach an agreement, which is still a possibility, although I doubt it, but it is a possibility. At that point, it would be an opportunity for Trump to tell the Europeans, you know, sort it out yourselves, sort it out yourselves. I'll leave it to you. For me, war is not so bad. I'm not interested. I'm here to do business. I'm going to take care of my tariffs, I'm going to take care of the trade balance, the crime problems in Washington, all that. And then after the rest, well, you created it, you followed it. Sort it out yourselves, do what you want. That's what suits him in a way, because it's important to know one thing, a war in Europe, on a purely economic level, you know, I'm not talking about other levels. On a purely economic level, that would still be very interesting for Father Trump. Why? Because if there is ever a war or more instability than we have today in Europe, well, capital will flee Europe, investment flows will flee Europe. It has already fled in reality, but it is something that could accelerate even more. Where will they go, in your opinion? Oh, well, they will go to the United States. States. They will find refuge in the United States. So there you have it. And you know that the whole goal of the Trump doctrine with his tariffs and everything, what is it? To bring back investment, bring back job creation, bring back financial flows to his country. That's how he wants to support his economy, right? That's the goal. So somehow, if it mixes with a dog's dough, as a witch I knew used to say, if it mixes with a dog's dough in Europe, well, he wouldn't be completely against it. You know what I mean? Well, we'll see. We'll see what happens. But still, once again, this meeting or summit without the presence of Europe is truly the summit that consecrates the geostrategic downgrading of Europe. And that tells us that 80 years of so called European construction have served absolutely no purpose. And Europe today is because of the women who run it, because of people like Macron, because of people like Starmer, people like Mers, that the European population continues to use impenetrable voices to oppose and put at their head. It seems that they are saying to themselves, we'll choose the worst and put it at our head. Well, today here is the result. Thank you my friends for watching this video. I would like to remind you of the existence this is not the release, it came out some time ago of the book the Great Betrayals, which explains how Europe has betrayed itself and got to where it is now. You can find it on Amazon. Thank you for watching this video and I'll see you in the next one.