Trump n'est pas encore élu! (+guerre ethnique en occident)

A French speaker explains that Trump's election wasn't final until the Electoral College voted on December 19, 2016. He dismisses recount and hacking claims, criticizes Clinton and the left, and argues the West faces an internal ethnic and cultural struggle tied to gender theory and opposition to Putin.
Good evening, my friends. As you know, Today is Saturday, December 17th. The American elections took place over a month ago in November. Donald Trump won the election. He is called the President Elect. But I'm going to tell you something. Something extremely surprising in the American system. Donald Trump has not yet been officially elected President of the United States. I'm not saying that he isn't yet President of the United States, as I know he. He will be elected on January 20th. But what I'm saying is that at this stage today, he has not yet been elected President of the United States. He will be elected this Monday. Let me explain. And there is something absolutely extraordinary. The American system is not a direct vote. That means it's not like in France for the presidential election, where people vote and then the one who gets the most votes for him wins. It's not like that. The United States on an electoral map is divided into a certain number of constituencies. It looks like a honeycomb, so to speak, with lots and lots of little boxes. For a president to be elected, he has to win as many of these little boxes as possible. Why? Because if there were a direct suffrage system, what would it have resulted in? It would have resulted in each candidate concentrating on the most populous states, such as California or certain states on the east coast, completely ignoring them. He doesn't even go to the states in the middle of the United States, which won't even have any influence in the election. So to do that, the United States had the idea of dividing their country into lots of little boxes. And you have to win as many of these little boxes as possible, which forces candidates to address all Americans and not just those on the big islands. That's why some have said that he manages to win the election with more votes and all that. But that doesn't count. It doesn't matter at all. By the way, I'm not even sure that he'll win the most votes, but it doesn't matter. The laws and rules were the same for her and for Trump, and they've been the same for almost all of the American elections. The fact remains that once the President has won as many of these little boxes as Donald Trump did, he's not yet elected. It's not over. Let me explain to you that in December, the second. The first Monday after the second Wednesday. So next Monday, Monday the 19th, will be the first Monday. Well, there's always a first Monday after Wednesday, but it will be the Monday after the second Wednesday of the month. The heads of each of these small electoral units, okay, each constituency will actually designate or elect a head of certain regions, such as the District of Columbia and Washington, for example, there will be three of these electors. They will all meet in their respective states. In fact, the. They don't meet in the same place, but they go to each state, and the representatives of these electoral districts meet to actually elect the President of the United States. And that's what really counts as the true election. Okay, so generally, these electors are simply confirming what happened in their district. If their district voted for Hyler, they'll vote for Hiller. If they voted for Trump, they'll vote for Trump. But in the history of the United States, there have been over a hundred, 160, I think, cases where these electors either abstained or voted the opposite of their district. So that means they weren't loyal to their district. In some states, the courts have the right to compel them to vote exactly the way they were elected, the way they were elected. But in most states, they have no legal obligation. They have a political obligation, a moral obligation, if you will, towards their electors. But that doesn't stop one or more of these voters from voting against what their constituency voted for, even if it means literally sacrificing their political career. But they could do it. So when Donald Trump won the election, at first, many channels like CNN and others, tried to light the fire and create a fitna, as they say in Arabic. What this means is that we saw demonstrations that became violent day after day, with the media coming to stir them up, fanning the flames in a way to stir up the demonstrations more and more in the hope of creating a kind of civil war and saying, well, you see, he's a monster, and we should. Maybe we should stop this and put Hiller in office, right? Always. It didn't work. There were a few scuffles here and there, but it stopped. Then they came out with the story of a recount. They said, no, we have to recount. So they started throwing money at it. They raised millions to do this recount. The fact remains that the recount widened the gap even further in some places. In most places, she lost even more votes. It didn't work. Now, they came up with the story that it was probably Russian hackers who controlled the elections from afar, and they hacked. They have no proof of that. There is no proof of that. And besides, when we look at Donald Trump and we see millions of Americans supporting him, backing him and all that, it's not Russian agreements that got into their heads, okay? Hillary and the left that's behind her don't Want to realize that Ilari lost for her own sake. She looks awful. She's ugly. She's ugly inside and out. She stinks from afar, this crazy woman. She stinks. She stinks of hatred. She reeks of madness. She reeks of corruption. But I'll tell you something. I'm going to send a compliment to the leftists. She's the best person they could find in their ranks. They gave their best. That's what you usually do in an election. You take the best and present them. She's the best in that camp. The fact remains that the system still has one last card. There are some voters, electors, who have threatened to vote against their constituency. There was one voter who spoke about this, and he said that there are plenty of them who risk doing it. That means that these voters can come and say, my constituency voted for Donald Trump. But I think this is the day to save America, to save democracy, to save freedom, to save the moderate rebels in Syria, to save Daesh. So what do we do? We vote. That's possible. Of course, they shoot themselves and end their careers, but, hey, they can also tell themselves that if this works, their system, their coup d', etat, will compensate them for the rest. That's the thing. So, in the history of the United States, in every election, there have been electors who have been disloyal, who have not been loyal to their electoral district. But that has never really changed the outcome of elections, historically speaking. Now that it's the last card of the system, honestly, regarding Trump's election, I won't breathe until the Monday after that, because I imagine that the system is preparing its network, its phone calls. It's buying who it's buying. It's threatening who it's threatening. And there's always a chance that they'll finally say, well, we have X number of electors, especially since you don't need to exchange them, all right? You just need to have enough to put Hyler ahead.
Okay?
If, for example, he. He exceeds her, I don't know by how many voters he has. If he exceeds her by 20, well, you just have to find 25 who want to change their minds, and that's enough. Then, bam, he comes back, and then she surpasses him. There are 538 electors, okay? 538 people who will meet in their respective states on Monday and who will cast their votes for president and vice president.
There you have it.
So I'm waiting for that. Of course, there's Obama today, who made some pretty harsh remarks against Putin. They hate Putin. And I'll tell you where this hatred comes from. I'll tell you something. And it has nothing to do with the American elections. It goes back a long way, of course. Why does France hate Putin? Why does the United States hate Putin? There's something. There's something. So I'm going to tell you what I say in private. I'm going to tell you my theory. Everyone has their own theory. You can look up what Putin is being criticized for. You'll find plenty of theories on blogs. I'll give you mine. It's worth what it's worth. I don't have a bill to prove it. I don't have a map to prove it, but I'll give it to you. Ah, the anti USSR campaign started. I remember very well. It didn't even start with Daesh, okay, that the French, the excuses that we call moderate rebels. It didn't even start with Daish, but it started with same sex marriage in France and in many places. Let me explain. There's a war. I'm going to use very harsh words. Huh? There's a racial war. There's an ethnic war in the West. I realize it, I see it. I mean, we know about this war. We know about ethnic wars in Africa. We have seen ethnic groups killed. We have seen wars over different skin colors and all that, but sometimes even shades of skin. That is not. Is a very specific racial war. It is a racial war, but if I had to describe it in medical terms, it would sound like an autoimmune disease. But it means that it is as if the body is attacking itself. It means that white Westerners, so to speak. Of course, I identify as white, but I do not identify as Westerners. White Westerners, White Westerners, if you will, are at war with themselves. No one wants to harm them. No one. Not blacks, not yellows, not Reds, not anyone. But they are their own enemies. That is what happens. Take, for example, the story of the. I don't know. No, I won't go off topic. I'll explain. They went to war with themselves. One of the fundamentals of this war was to destroy the white man's family unit. Okay, because I'll tell you something. Take marriage for all. We promoted it. We rarely promoted it with the woman marrying the woman. How did we promote it? We promoted it with the man marrying the man. Which man? In general, is it Mohammed who marries Kadore or Redouan? Or is it Efri who marries Moshe? No, no, it's not like that, my friends. It's Claude who marries Jean Pierre, isn't it?
That's it.
That's post Christian white.
Okay?
That's it.
Why? Because it results in a sterile couple. Great.
There you go.
That's it.
You've destroyed the family unit. There's a war against that. By the way, you notice when they talk to you about a. When they promote, there is real promotion that is done. When they take a four year old boy, they say, yes, he wants to become a girl. You see, they have never, ever sought to make Western women more virile. They will rarely present you with a woman and tell you, he's transformed into a man. No, that's not possible. That's not possible. It's always systematically, a post Christian white man who is transformed into a feminized man. Feminized like that he doesn't reproduce and like that. You know that the feminine principle, we need the feminine principle. And I have infinite respect for the feminine principle.
We.
We need the masculine principle. And it is the balance of the two that a society needs. But when a society becomes more feminine, it is a society that loses its authenticity. That loses, for example, the authenticity of going to beat up terrorists in the toilets to kill them, okay? The woman says, oh, why did you do that? But hey, the guy says, shut up.
Okay?
That's what I'm doing.
There you have it.
There is a need for that. There is a need for these two principles in a society. Putin understood that. He forbade it. He didn't go hunting for homosexuals in Russia or elsewhere, but he forbade people.
Who.
Are, let's say, at the forefront of this racial war between whites and who use, among other things, the gender theory that was tested by transforming two twin brothers. One was transformed into a woman, the other into a non. Transformed. I mean, these are gimmicks. You can't transform. You don't want to change sex. They made them sleep together. They both ended up committing suicide. A real mess with a background of incest and everything. That's where gender theory comes from. And it's applied to you and not to Muhammad and Redouan, okay? Because Muhammad and Redouan, like Ephrai and Moshe, they still have social principles, they have religious principles that they inherited and that allow them, despite all odds, even when the white man marries a white man, they will allow them to stay the course on certain things. They will allow them to keep them, but the white man has no chance. So Putin understood this war. He didn't want to destroy the Russians, that's all. He didn't want to leave and destroy Russia because he holds a grudge against it. And that's when it started.
There you have it.
So those who are waging this war have relied on a lobby of 2,000 people. But we don't give a damn about the lobby of 2,000 people. I'm putting the spotlight on it. I'm going to buy a drone or a remote controlled car. So I'll explain. Putin didn't want to destroy his people, so he became the enemy to be defeated. How is it that this nation is a reserve of white people, a reserve of white Christians? I mean, what needs to be destroyed? But that's the white man's vision. There are no black people, no brown people, no yellow people, no one who wants to destroy white people. No one wants to destroy them. Everyone wishes them well.
Really?
Really. But they want to kill themselves. And they don't understand that Putin, who reigns over the largest territory containing this kind, this species, is not ready to destroy it. That's the problem. That's where it started. So they relied on a minority, but we don't give a damn about minorities. If I were a dictator, you know what I would do? Every time I have a fantasy, I will find 50 people to justify it and say, I am doing it while respecting the minority. Do you understand? Democracy is hard because democracy. What do you have to base yourself on democracy? You have to base yourself on the majority. When there is a majority, there is only one. You have an idea, you have a project. Yes. You are for it, against it. People are for it. You have to do it. If they are against it, you have to stop. That is democracy. So it is frustrating for politicians. But if you want to work on your own, whatever the project, really, whatever the project. Let's imagine that you want to whip people every morning, give them 100 lashes, tax them at 100%, for example. Imagine if you want to do that, you will always find a minority of 50 crazy people who will agree. So if you do it to respect minorities and give rights to minorities, of course you can do it. Of course you can do it.
You'll have. You'll have.
You'll say, but no, you know, I respect minorities. I know that others will.
That's it.
Okay?
You understand? That's the idea. In fact, the idea of minorities is anti democracy by its very nature rather than right. I can look at Stalin and I can tell you that Stalin respected minorities. Because everything Stalin did, I can find Russians who agreed, okay? It was the Soviets who agreed. Do you understand what I mean? That's the Story.
There you have it.
Now, I don't have what I just said. The tirade of the last 10 minutes. I don't have a B. I don't have a card to prove it to you by a B. Now. Well, here it is. This is what I think. Okay, this is what I think. Still. I think I'm right about this.
There you go.
Until proven Otherwise. Okay, it's 17 minutes and I'll add one last one. Let me tell you something. I was talking to an English guy a few days ago, you know, I was with him. He received a card. He opened it.
It said.
I don't remember the exact terminology, but it was like, I'll translate it into French, like, happy winter. Huh?
Okay.
Happy, happy winter. I don't even know if we're making a connection or not. Happy winter. No, the winters. Well, happy winter. Well, I don't remember. See, see, I have a problem right now that this is chopping. Anyway, I'm sure that there's always a French teacher who will come up in the comments and correct me. But that's good.
That's good.
I'm learning. I really am learning. I'm happy. That's also why I share to learn. And what happens is that I said to him, listen, can I tell you something? He's an old man. I said, I wasn't born in England, so I'm a foreigner, you see, I was born in Algeria. I don't know all the customs and traditions of this country. So I like you, I trust you.
I.
And I think you're the right person to answer me. He said, yes, of course. He said, you know, I don't know everything either. I said, I know, but do you know more than me? So I said, listen, I want to send cards at the end of the year. I sent cards to people and then I wanted to send cards to say Merry Christmas. And I said to him, I don't know, but I'm afraid it might offend people. I said, are people in this country offended by a Merry Christmas?
Okay?
And then I said to him, listen to me. In my country, people aren't. They're not Christians in general, but they love coming to visit England during the Christmas period. They like to take selfies with Santa Clauses. They like to take pictures of themselves in front of Christmas trees to post them on their Facebook. And they're very happy.
There you go.
Okay?
Because listen, honestly, even among the Salafists, no one has ever questioned Christmas. Christmas is a white on white war, right? There's no such thing. As don't put Muslims in this. Really, you know, I'm very, uh. I'm a bit of a jerk when it comes to criticizing them. Sometimes I even regret it, and I'm a little too light on it. But really, it's not about them. I've never seen a Muslim who was against Christmas. They know that it's your holiday for them, it's so to speak. The Christians, I. And that's it. They say we have an eye, they have their eye, and that's it. Right. As simple as that. And then he looked at me and said, some people might be shocked. He said, I have neighbors who are Jehovah's Witnesses. Once they gave me the card back. Okay, fine, I said. Again, I said, but you'll always find out how many Jehovah's Witnesses I know. I don't know anyone. Ah, but the majority, he said, no, the majority aren't shocked. He said, but, you know, we're a culture, we don't like to shock people. He told me, even if it's very, very few people, we don't want to offend Al. We prefer to say Merry winter.
There you go.
Okay, I said, you know, I'm going to tell you something. I'm going to say something. He told me, yes. I said, I'm shocked when someone tells me Merry Winter. That's what shocks me. I said, I'm going to see a Merry Christmas. I'm going to see it. I'm going to see it on my card. I said, I don't want Merry winter. I said, I don't like it. I feel frustrated. I feel hurt, attacked, offended. That's what he was shocked about. He didn't know what to do because she's in deep, you know. And then he said, oh, okay, I know he's stuck there. It was bugging his head. It was dividing by zero blue screens and everything. It's a disaster. Okay, anyway, apart, he told me, merry, Merry Christmas. He told me he was very. He's very happy to say Merry Christmas. Okay, Merry Christmas. Okay, my friends, I'll leave you. I'll leave you and then we'll see what the system will do. Ah, I hope Trump manages to get elected anyway. I hope they don't pull another bad stunt this week. And then because they have their guy against Russia, they really want it.
That's it. That's it.
They need this war. I don't know why. Well, we know why. But hey, they really want it.
That's all. That's it.
My friends and I wish you all the best. And Merry Christmas, too. Merry Christmas, mister.
More from Aldo

La FIN du Royaume-Uni ? L'Ecosse, l'Irlande du Nord et le Pays de Galles veulent partir !

Analyse Présidentielles 2027 : Marine le Pen remet ENCORE le voile sur la table !

Scandale "60 Millions de Consommateurs" : la France mange des pâtes contaminées au Cadmium !

2 dossiers : Accident d'autogyre en Italie & un pilote sauvé par le parachute du Cirrus






